Home | About ARMA | Where to Start | What's New | Forum | Spotlight | Articles & Essays | Research & Reading | Index
ARMAtitlebar.jpg (47555 bytes)
Research and Discussion Forums
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Joachim Meyer Figure F
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts Forum Index -> Virtual Classroom - closed archive
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bill Welch



Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 144
Location: Knoxville, TN

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:30 pm    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

Jaron,
Looks like it to me also. Are we sure that its not the guy defending with the grip, as much as one striking the other guy in the hands?
_________________
Thanks, Bill
You have got to love the violence inherent in the system.
Your mother is a hamster and your father smell of Elderberries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jaron Bernstein



Joined: 07 Dec 2003
Posts: 1108

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:26 am    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

The text says:

Kniechelhauw

Dieser hat den Namen von dem Gliedt, nach welchem er gerichtet wirdt, den vollend also, wann du mit deinen henden hoch uber den Kopff nach dem ersten angriff, deinem gegenfechter under sein Schwerdt kommen bist, und seinen Kopff also zwischen beiden Armen heltet, so Hauw mit den Zwirchhäuwen under seines Schwerts Knopff, ubersich nach seinen Kniecheln, oder zu den gelencken zwischen seiner Hand und Arm, helt er die hendt gar zu hoch, so Hauw mit obgemelten Zwirchhäuwen von Unden auff nach dem knöpfflein bey den Elenbogen, so ist er gemacht.

Knuckle Strike

This strike takes its name from the joint against which it is tried, and is completed thus: when at first you hold your hands high above your head, and your opponent is moving under his sword so his head is held between both arms, then strike with a traversing strike under his sword's pommel, with a view to his knuckles or to the joints between hand and arm. If he holds his hands much too high, then strike with a rising traverse Strike from below up against the knob of his elbows, thus is it completed.

I am thinking that the right dude on the F figure is doing a rising zwerch (is it still a zwerch if it rises?) after the guy on the left kept his arms too high for too long. Maybe the left dude was just reacting at the last moment by trying to drop his hands. I don't know for sure as those particular figures aren't to my knowledge referenced in the text. It just seems that the text fits the picture best out all available in the Rasmussen translation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matt_Bruskotter



Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 53
Location: Columbus, OH

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:05 pm    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

That's a good explanation. Are all the figures mentioned in the text somewhere or are only a few represented? I've read the whole longsword version but I never tried to compare all the figures, just the ones to which Meyer explicitly refers.

The small difference in the two pictures on this thread or that in the picture given my Mr. Clements the left figure is stepping with his right and the cut is coming from his right. How to step and cut on the same side is explained in many other fight books. In the Meyer picture, it looks as if he is stepping with his left and cutting from the right and this confused me. Is this another "action shot" when he is continuing to step after the cut landed or is be back pedaling?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jaron Bernstein



Joined: 07 Dec 2003
Posts: 1108

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

"That's a good explanation. Are all the figures mentioned in the text somewhere or are only a few represented? I've read the whole longsword version but I never tried to compare all the figures, just the ones to which Meyer explicitly refers."

That is the fun part. Some of the figures are specifically referenced in the text, some aren't. What I found useful was to print out all the woodcuts in one separate stack and then read though the text. Where the text specifically lists a picture, note that on the picture. Then re-read the text comparing the described techniques that don't have a figure with the remaining pictures and see what matches best.

"The small difference in the two pictures on this thread or that in the picture given my Mr. Clements the left figure is stepping with his right and the cut is coming from his right. How to step and cut on the same side is explained in many other fight books. In the Meyer picture, it looks as if he is stepping with his left and cutting from the right and this confused me. Is this another "action shot" when he is continuing to step after the cut landed or is be back pedaling?"

Beats me. Try to recreate it with Corey and see what you come up with. IMO (after walking through it with my imaginary opponent) it is a mid-technique snapshot, just as most of the other ones (guards aside) are.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Cartier



Joined: 23 Sep 2002
Posts: 594
Location: USA Florida

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

Quote:
is it still a zwerch if it rises?)


I think so if you look at the schielhau translation it even mentions the zwerch as coming somewhat from below.


Quote:
Thwart<br>You send yourself into the Thwarter thus: assume the primary stance of Wrathful Guard to the right (as shown in the previous chapter), that is you put your left foot forward and hold your sword over your right shoulder, as if you would strike a wrathful strike, and when your opponent strikes you from the roof or above, strike closely with your short edge, breaking against his strike from below, holding your hilt high above to displace near your head, and strike to close by stepping full onto his Left side, thus displacing and closing against the other as shown by the left background figures of illustration H. This can be executed to the left thus striking his right side with a changed point, in that you will strike against his right by engaging with the long edge.


_________________
Mike Cartier
Meyer Frei Fechter
www.freifechter.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
david welch



Joined: 18 Dec 2002
Posts: 455
Location: Knoxville TN

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 10:08 pm    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

In the recent past, I remember reading in "a" fightbook about hand strikes: (paraphrase) "strike the hands, but for play and practice, strike the hilt between the hands." I wonder if this is what is going on here? Unfortunately I don't remember the source.
_________________
"A sword never kills anybody; it is a tool in the killer's hand." Lucius Annaeus Seneca 4BC-65AD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jaron Bernstein



Joined: 07 Dec 2003
Posts: 1108

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 10:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

That takes some impressive aim to hit the handle but not the hands! I usually aim for the wrist and sometimes even get it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aaron Pynenberg



Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 533
Location: Appleton WI

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 10:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

hmmm... That's interesting and would make some sense, does anyone know of a refrence talking about any kind of padding or protection? I think there was a mention about gloves or gauntlets somewhere in one of the books I have, I'll have to dig through it, but I have never seen gloves on any of the drawings/woodcuts?
_________________
"Because I Like It"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Cartier



Joined: 23 Sep 2002
Posts: 594
Location: USA Florida

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 7:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

no i have never seen any padded gear in any artwork but I beleive Amberger makes some mention of padded stuff of some sort in one of his articles (the fechtschule one i think).
_________________
Mike Cartier
Meyer Frei Fechter
www.freifechter.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jake_Norwood



Joined: 19 Sep 2002
Posts: 920
Location: Clarksville, TN

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:50 am    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

Guys,

Good theories all, but the execution of that maneuver is in the text. In fact, it is Meyer's most overt "edge parry," where he says to catch the opponent's blade on the edge of your starck (of course!) and then strike with a winding, etc. The position is like hangen, but the point slopes the "wrong" way.

Sorry I can't site the paragaraph, etc. It's in the portion un-translated by Rassmussen and I'm not in a position (Iraq and all) to look it up.

Jake
_________________
Sen. Free Scholar
ARMA Deputy Director
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Mike Cartier



Joined: 23 Sep 2002
Posts: 594
Location: USA Florida

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:25 am    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

That sounds alot like one of the devices from Wrath guard. Or at least it is very similar, except that the flat is used rather than the edge.
_________________
Mike Cartier
Meyer Frei Fechter
www.freifechter.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaryGrzybek



Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 401
Location: Stillwater, New Jersey

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

Cool, I do this a lot but never realized where it came from. I suppose because it's seems very natural?
_________________
Gary

G.F.S.
ARMA Northern N.J.
Albion Armorers Collectors Guild
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Matt Bryant



Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 133
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma

PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Joachim Meyer Figure F Reply with quote

It looks like the Knuckle Strike to me.
_________________
Matt Bryant
Scholar Adept
ARMA Associate Member - Tulsa, Oklahoma

"Keepe the point of your Staffe right in your enemies face..." -Joseph Swetnam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts Forum Index -> Virtual Classroom - closed archive All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Anti Bot Question MOD - phpBB MOD against Spam Bots
Blocked registrations / posts: 222185 / 0

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright © 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright © 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site © 1999-2009 by ARMA.