|
Student Ratings within the ARMA Within ARMA we are all merely students –even the instructors. We will always be continuing students of the sword. But, in the effort to bring better quality and professionalism to pursuit of our subject, we follow the close combat guidance of the historical Schooles of Defence. In doing such we adopt the tradition of the 16th century German Fechtschulen ("fight school") and the "Company of London Masters of Defence" in using the four-level ranking system they employed. Thus, ARMA's modern students consist of four primary ratings: Scholar, Free scholar, Provost, and Master. Each of these reflects an adept rank in our curricula. However, it may come as a surprise that within ARMA the granting of the rank of "Master" is currently reserved and excluded. Thus, we do not (yet) use the "Master" title for even the most skilled senior students and expert instructors. As ARMA feels no one today has yet demonstrated the right or has earned the privilege of claiming "mastery" in teaching the use of these forgotten fighting arts that are still being actively recovered, we do not now assert privilege to qualify students to this rating. Certainly someday we expect to. For some it is a goal, but for most it is years off and not a concern. The more immediate, more important objective is improving personal skill and knowledge while re-developing this Art of arms along the ARMA standard. This is in keeping with our demand for commitment to the highest learning and martial ability in this "Noble Science of Defence." Members teaching within ARMA (to be rated no higher than Provost at present) are therefore referred to informally as "Instructors." Instructors have higher skill as well as knowledge and teaching ability. They know the history and the scholarship and can teach techniques credibly as well as demonstrate concepts and principles expertly. |
||||
In our practice of Renaissance martial arts we have developed and instituted certification ratings for becoming adept in each weapon and fighting skill (i.e., longsword, dagger, staff weapons, short sword & buckler, sword & dagger, rapier, rapier & dagger, polaxe, Ringen, etc.).
Under the Member Training Program (MTP) a student would first seek ranking as a Scholar (longsword adept) then as a Free-Scholar, consisting of further specialization in additional weaponry and skills, such as side-sword, rapier, sword & buckler, dagger, Ringen, and pole-arms. Keep in mind that, standards for Free Scholar are minimal requirements that must be met for recognition of rank. But, Study Groups are free to add on any other additional elements they deem appropriate, so long as the core certification requirements are met. Provosts also have authority to advance their own students to the general rating upon approval. As part of advancement, ranked members are also expected to assist their local fellow members in study and curriculum development. Scholars begin typically study with the longsword, then are rated later in other individual weapons and proficiencies. Progressing between Rates from Scholar to Free Scholar and Senior Free Scholar, and then on to Provost rankings, is achieved only through testing. This consists of physical demonstration with particular weapons, an oral quiz, and finally an extensive free-sparring challenge with various weapons against other students (both junior and senior). But, ARMA students are not consumed with advancing in rank. They are not focusing on or aiming at that "next belt level". When a senior student feels ready and has the prowess to be recognized, they then will be progressed to the next Rate. It is then an earned honor and privilege of recognition by ones peers. After all, Masters of Defence in the Medieval and Renaissance eras were often only those teachers who had proven their skills and knowledge to thereby earn the respect and acclaim of their students.
Skill Proficiency Certification The ARMA’s objectives are to redevelop and teach authentic Medieval and Renaissance self-defense methods from the historical sources. To do this we rate students in individual proficiencies following the practice standards established in our training curriculum. To be certified with a rating for any individual skill proficiency consists of demonstrating competency in three areas: scholarship (history and theory), principles, and techniques. These are confirmed through oral exam, physical demonstration or technical display, and free-play (sparring bouts).
Scholar Evaluation - sample criteria for Longsword Adept: Certification in the longsword consists of three tests whose objectives must be successfully met in order to be awarded ranking. All test parts must be passed over one session. The objective is to qualify whether or not the student meets the minimum skill standards that the ARMA has set for this craft. 1. Verbal Examination - Describe in short answers longsword history, forms, anatomy and parts. Describe names, dates, and significance of the major source literature for the weapon. Demonstrate general knowledge of terms, concepts, and principles. Explain the basis of the ARMA approach to study and methodology for training as well as our philosophy for reconstructing historical fencing skills. 2. Floryshe Display - Demonstrate a spontaneous practice routine of assorted strikes, wardings, covering, and motion in a prepared yet unstructured manner using proper form, speed, flow, coordination, vocalization, and intent. A variety of fundamental actions and techniques should be performed with good tempo and fighting rhythm for approximately 20 to 40 seconds. Basic stances and cuts must be included along with key footwork. 3. Basic Techniques - Demonstrate proficiency in primary cutting exercises, stance transitions, and stepping motions performed at proper speed with both good intent and control. This may be waived if included in the floryshe portion. For later Free-Scholar rating a formal Prize Playing challenge is added. Prior to this, the student candidate's skill in sparring must have been previously demonstrated to a considerable degree using wooden or blunt steel weapons, including awareness of contact and control against opponents of all experience levels. They must be capable of safely executing techniques in free-play against fellow students and instructors in a manner that reveals control in the tactical application of actions. They must be able to face dissimilar weapons and opponents of equal or lesser rating. Depending on the number of participating fighters, each individual bout may end after any one single good hit or continue on for three separate clean hits. Bouts are followed consecutively by one another until all have been completed in the given time. For a list of seminar courses within our Member Training Program go here. For for
non-member instruction see our Open Workshops here.
|
|
|||
|
|||
|