The ARMA’s History
The
first incarnation of our historical fencing organization grew from an
original conception as a loose umbrella organization that would allow
various Medieval and Renaissance sword practitioners and students of
European arms & armor to train and practice together. The ARMA was
previously known as “HACA” - The Historical Armed Combat Association.
HACA was originally first conceived around 1991 by the late Hank
Reinhardt, then President of Museum Replicas Limited, and a few
like-minded fellows outside Atlanta, Georgia. His idea was to provide
an umbrella organization for individuals seeking some sort of group
affiliation to share their common interest in Western swords and
historical weaponry. Hank was not concerned with how people organized
or what individuals called themselves whenever they got together. As he
put it, all he cared about was the rules they sparred under and the
historical and physiological basis for them. He also envisioned a way
to provide martial instruction in historical European weaponry. To this
end, Reinhardt advertised his newly formed group around a few of his
long-time associates and then made mention of it in the Museum Replicas
Limited catalog. For a small fee interested persons could obtain a
membership that included sparring guidelines, networking, and
information on future events for certifying weapon proficiencies.
Due
to various complications, time constraints, and assorted other reasons,
Hank was unable to follow through on his ambitious plans. By 1993,
after almost a decade of exploring similar pursuits and seeing that the
unique HACA idea was essentially defunct and going nowhere, long-time
sword enthusiast and practitioner John Clements (later ARMA Director)
obtained from Hank permission to take over HACA effort and try to make
something out of the concept. Via correspondence John had begun a
mentoring process of sorts with Hank in 1991 and already had been
growing increasingly distressed at the emphasis on role-play and
fantasy in virtually all practice of Medieval and Renaissance fighting
arts. Hank Reinhardt gave his blessing John to create something out of
the original HACA idea.
Determined
to bring greater legitimacy and credibility and a serious martial
approach to historical European fighting arts, Clements (who had been
studying the subject since 1980 and publicly teaching classes since
1992) re-formed HACA
and developed the first small Study Group to actively promote the
concept. Under a new set of Affirmations and with a new Study
Approach, HACA was reinvented as a club for research and training
advice. By establishing a virtual headquarters online in 1996 as one of
the very first historical fencing websites, HACA was then able provide
a haven for similar students and scholars of the subject worldwide.
Throughout the 1990’s HACA then became a leading force in the revival
of Medieval and Renaissance fighting skills. HACA’s contribution to the
subject has been significant and its influence notable and many of its
innovations have become standard for enthusiasts and practitioners.
Following this association’s steady growth was impressive.
When
John Clements first took over and reconceived HACA in 1994, he did so
as a means of focusing effort on studying the works of the historical
Masters of Defence and resurrecting their arts, rather than just
creating new modern conceptions of historical combat. He taught
and wrote on the subject out of Houston, Texas starting in 1996.
The club's website (the first ever of its kind) and its program
were specifically set up by Clements to aid novice enthusiasts who were
training alone. Another role was to network practitioners while
informing the public about the reality of historical European martial
arts and its associated arms and armor.
In
July of 2001, the realization was reached that the organization had
outgrown the HACA label. It was determined that subject being richer
and more involved than anyone previously believed and so deserved
more. It was determined that the emerging historical fencing
community itself had grown and changed in a very short time---with no
small way thanks to HACA. In that time HACA grew popular and became
extremely influential in the historical fencing community. The
environment seven years later was a different landscape as a result. It
was therefore decided that to continue to advance the subject in this
new climate HACA was ready again to innovate and change the scene. The
result was its rebirth as ARMA - the Association for Renaissance
Martial Arts.
Clements conceived the name as an entirely original
conception, a well-fitting acronym but with real-historical meaning as
a word.
Having
outgrown its HACA identity, it was time for our international
educational club of like-minded fellows to refine, expand, and evolve
into an even more effective organization for the study and practice of
Medieval and Renaissance close-combat skills. HACA referred to
“historical” armed combat, yet our focus was specifically on Medieval
and Renaissance periods, and it did lead to minor confusion for some.
Additionally, HACA referred to “armed” combat and yet we have always
included a substantial emphasis on unarmed skills. The historical
material on Medieval and Renaissance grappling and wrestling arts
increasingly coming to light only underscored this for us. Earlier,
HACA had first been about crusading for serious treatment of European
arms and armor and then aimed at recognition of the historical fighting
literature as legitimate sources of study. That being “mission
accomplished, the ARMA was set up to take it from there. ARMA’s
re-conceptualization was largely influenced by the work of Dr. Sydney
Anglo, as presented in his monumental and revolutionary book, The
Martial Arts of Renaissance Europe (Yale University Press 2000).
As an official academic advisor, Dr. Anglo was instrumental in
retooling the ARMA’s vision of historical fencing studies. His
research, along with other recent advances in this subject, changed the
face of historical European martial arts interest and had a profound
impact on the subject.
Further,
as research has shown, the connection between Medieval and Renaissance
fencing methods is direct and undeniable. In this subject the
ARMA focuses on both Medieval and Renaissance eras and the two ages are
not distinctly separable. Medieval and Renaissance fighting arts
are intertwined and historians find it difficult to offer a precise
demarcation between them. The fighting arts we study date from at least
the 13th century and show a clear continuity in principles and concepts
into the 17th. Indeed, since the vast majority of our source texts are
from post 1400, with the only evidence for “Medieval” systems of
fencing coming from a mere two earlier texts, the phrase “Renaissance
martial arts” is thus actually more fitting and accurate for this
subject. At present, when it comes to actual “Medieval” text
sources, only one surviving text from the late 1200s and one from the
late 1300s are known in contrast to dozens from the period
1400-1650. Thus, the new name is not only more accurate but
better suited to our function and objective. We chose the word
“Renaissance” in our title specifically because it is doubly
appropriate, not only in the sense of the historical period itself, but
also the idea of renewal and revival, of reawakening. The word
Renaissance, meaning literally “rebirth” or “renewal”, describes the
radical and comprehensive changes that took place in European culture
during roughly the 14th to 16th centuries. The Renaissance is the name
given the great intellectual and cultural movement which occurred in
these centuries. Rebirth was often a key concept in Medieval and
Renaissance literature, which spoke of “restoration” and a
“reflowering” of civilization. This is indeed what we are
currently witnessing in our subject –an unprecedented resurgence and
recovery—a renaissance—in lost knowledge of historical European
fighting arts!
The
ARMA established itself for individuals to pursue Medieval and
Renaissance fighting skills with like-minded colleagues sharing a love
for historical European weapons and swordsmanship. Its primary aims
are to advance the quality of skill demonstrated with Medieval and
Renaissance combatives, offer authoritative information, and improve
the relationship between practitioners and academics in order to
improve understanding of these skills. A worldwide network of practitioners and researchers work toward its mission. The
focus of the revamped ARMA website became that of assisting Study
Groups with
resources and study materials as well as promoting the credibility and
validity of historical European martial arts from the Renaissance era.
Paid memberships were then offered with selected individuals
being offered a variety of research materials, resources, and study
aids. Fellows were able to come together under a shared
methodlogy with like-minded enthusiasts who shared the same values,
motives, and goals. The primary
aims of the ARMA were intentionally at advancing the quality of skill demonstrated with
Medieval and Renaissance combatives, offering authoritative information,
and improving the relationship between practitioners and academics in
order to improve understanding of these skills. Raising the quality of
discourse on the subject of historical European Martial Arts while
promoting its serious investigation was set as a foremost
goal, as was promoting both interest in and advancement of the
subject. In the noise and chaos of the Internet, this message
often gets lost.
This
effort is offered through the ARMA’s system for historical fencing,
online historical manuals and translations, National Training Program
curriculum and Ranking certification, plus online forum, articles,
video clips, and new training advice. The ARMA's senior students
and instructors are unrivaled in the quality of demonstrated fighting
skills. The ARMA is second-to-none is its offerings of original
research, insightful essays and editorials, and free historical
materials. More ARMA members have also published books and scholarly
articles on this subject than other historical fencing organization.
Raising
the quality of discourse on the subject of historical European Martial
Arts while promoting its serious investigation has always been one of
our foremost goals, as has promoting both interest in and advancement
of the subject. In the noise and chaos of the Internet, this
message often gets lost.
The
ARMA has garnered a reputation as the leading source for this craft and
the foremost proponents of historical fencing studies. The future holds
exciting possibilities as ARMA attempts to bring greater structure,
credibility, and authority to the pursuit of authentic Renaissance
fighting arts. Now, more than ever, the ARMA is the cutting edge
in the study and practice of Renaissance martial arts.
|