| Home | About ARMA | Where to Start | What's New | Forum | Spotlight | Articles & Essays | Research & Reading | Index |
|---|
![]() |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Of actual Medieval and Renaissance martial arts, no living tradition or
extant school or style of historical fighting skills –as
practiced and taught in those periods –has survived intact to
our present time. As well, no 18th or
19th century schools and masters of fence
retained the old skills of earlier arms and armor in their curriculum
nor did any of them claim to. Rather, they more or less
professed a new refined and “superior” method of gentlemanly
self-defense directed toward the single combat conditions of the duel
of honor –with decreasing military application. Today’s modern fencing styles –based exclusively on the three tools of foil, epee, and sabre –derive directly from these 18th and 19th century patterns. For many decades these formed the basis for most all approaches to studying any methods of Medieval and Renaissance fencing, particularly systems of theatrical choreography and stage combat theory. Alternatives seldom ranged far from attempts at historically inspired tournament games and martial sports or thinly disguised and repackaged Asian martial arts. Our wish is not to merely understand their craft from a technical or academic point of view, or merely demonstrate as show or stunt what we think their movements were like, but instead to develop from their methods genuine martial understanding and practical fighting ability. |
ARMA members are proponents of the fact that historical European combat skills from the 13th to 17th centuries were sophisticated, highly developed, and highly effective fighting arts the equivalent of any comparable martial disciplines produced in Asia.We must “reconstruct” and “revive” these arts because the “tradition” in this case has been lost and formal transmission of skills from teacher to student irrevocably broken. While academic study is an integral part of historical fencing activities, as martial artists ours is a decidedly hands-on physical pursuit and our goal is to develop personal fighting skills.
|
|---|
It
goes without saying that today Medieval and Renaissance martial arts
cannot be earnestly studied or taught within the same historical
context under which they originally developed.
|
Today we find ourselves in a new age of discovery, a Renaissance of the European martial arts. Old superstitions and outdated beliefs are being challenged by new scientific knowledge brought about by the rediscovery of old texts.
ARMA seeks genuine understanding of historical European fighting arts within a modern incarnation. Our efforts are not aimed at adapting historical techniques and teachings to sporting competitions and tournament games. While we are doing far more than costumed role-play or performance displays, we are admittedly not doing training for real combat either. After all, no one today is going to attack us with swords out in public or challenge us to duels. But to build a new tradition, as best we can we approach these combat skills as if they were intended to be used. |
Just as the priest and master of arms Hanko
Doebringer's in his writings on the teachings of Master Liechtenauer in
1389 complained of the Leichmeisters ("dance masters"), an insult for
the show-fighters who instead of knowing the real art only used flashy
and ineffective technique for display, we to feel this problem is still
with us today. Doebringer stated the reality of swordsmanship was
serious and proceeded on the closest and shortest way, quickly and
readily; when one wants to strike and thrust in the surest manner as
could be done. He noted that rightful swordsmanship did not have any
beautiful and broad parries and large motions or fencing around, to
impressed unskilled observers people. The Leichmeisters he observed
stood still and made large motions slowly and clumsily, creating two or
three strokes out of what was really one because they want to be
respected by those who do not understand the art, so that they often
delayed and missed and in the process exposed themselves. His comments
are very telling to us who have criticised the ubiquitous lack of
martial intent and authenticity in theatrical combat and modern stunt
fighting shows.
|
Rather
than trying to
fit
what we know about period combat into a preconceived pretend version of
it, we instead integrate what we learn about Medieval and Renaissance
fencing into a system of training and practice that includes
mock-combat. In contrast to the 18th century
definition of fencing as essentially the art of single sword duelling,
ARMA accepts the definition of Medieval and Renaissance fencing as it
originally meant in the periods: armed combat skills which always
incorporated close-in and unarmed techniques.
The ARMA is not concerned with exclusively knightly tournaments sports or later gentlemanly “duels of honor”, but with the whole panoply of personal fighting skills of the period from roughly 950-1700. The sheer enormity of this subject and its transitory nature, as more material and accurate interpretations appear almost monthly, means we simply cannot be as precise or firm as we would like. Nor can we address every facet of the subject from every historical master’s view. What we can do is offer a reliable starting point and a sound means by which to study.
ARMA endeavors to avoid the
commonplace “museum curator” approach to historical fencing which
treats it as a fossilized cultural artifact. ARMA uses as its
model not only the German Fechtschulen and English fighting guilds of
the 16th century, but also follows as its
inspiration the first historical fencing enthusiasts who did much to
legitimize the subject –the late 19th century British
practitioner-researchers Captain Alfred Hutton, Egerton Castle, Sir
Frederick Pollock, Captain Carl Thimm, and Colonel Cyril Matthey.
It is an axiom of martial
arts and historical fencing that only a master or a very skilled
fighter can check all the faults that a beginner is liable to make when
learning. But no one alive today knows what Medieval or
Renaissance styles really looked liked nor how exactly they were passed
on. Obviously there are no living historical masters today around to
teach us. Yet, if we carefully study the illustrations in the surviving
texts, translate their words with precision, and interpret both based
on a sound understanding of how the weapons in
question can actually be employed, then the historical techniques and
principles of the source manuals are not difficult to
reconstruct. We seek not to produce students that are
technically proficient in movement patterns yet tactically ineffectual
as fighters. We seek instead the meaning of the authentic historical
teachings…and through analysis, a modern way to practice them once
again as credible martial disciplines. When it comes to Renaissance martial arts, we concluded,
authenticity does not exist unless we now reconstruct it.
This, then, in a nutshell is what ARMA does.
To this end, ARMA…- Maintains a network of individuals students and study groups studying Renaissance martial arts. - Promotes research and scholarship into historical fencing and European martial culture. - Promotes Free-Play / Sparring guidelines for fighting practice. - Encourages training and test-cutting with historically accurate replicas of European swords and weaponry. - Advocates an open dialogue and exchange of skills among martial artists, fencers, researchers, scholars, historians, re-enactors and re-creationists within the Historical Fencing community. - Offers a resource base for the study and translation of historical European fighting manuals. - Holds classes, workshops, and seminars, as well as offering lectures and demonstrations. - Offers students a proven system of study that is martially sound and historically valid. |
What does it mean to practice Renaissance Martial Arts?
The historical fencing
movement has gained great momentum in recent years, as more and more
serious students have rediscovered the original historical manuals and
realized their value as unparalleled sources of study. The old orthodox
view of fencing history is fading in light of a new generation of
historical European martial arts practitioners aided by advances in
scholarship and communication.
To explore and learn our subject requires we conduct pure research and experimentation in the investigation of European arms and armor and their use combined with honest supposition, conjecture, and analysis. For the purpose of developing training sequences, drills, and practice routines we define terminology and identify essential principles and concepts from historical fencing manuals. These efforts aim at establishing a new pedagogy of instruction or Medieval and Renaissance martial arts as combative skills instead of martial sports. Our perspective is that of training and instructing. Hence, in our modern practice now we explore them and try to master them as if they were really intended to be used –even though we realistically know this will never be the case.
The domain of Medieval and Renaissance fencing today involves a multitude of proficiencies. These teachings must be studied within their own context, following conditions approximating those they were originally practiced under, and using weapons and equipment of the same historical styles. The sophisticated fighting skills of the 13th to 17th centuries were highly developed and effective. To learn them again requires considerable research and physical effort that cannot be acquired except by pursuing them along a similar historical manner.
While
the motivation for studying this subject will surely be different for
each individual, certain general elements can be identified. These
skills are obsolete for modern war and duelling itself is a thing of
the past, however there are still genuine self-defence components to be
learned. There are of course strong health benefits to be derived from
the exercise, stress relief, and physical and mental conditioning found
within martial practice. Improved physical fitness and mental
well-being as well as character are all well-known aspects of the
pursuit of fencing or martial arts. Additionally, within Medieval and
Renaissance fencing there are other elements at work such as gaining an
appreciation for our Western heritage and history and the ingenuity
with which our ancestors met adversity. Finally, the camaraderie found
in learning and playing together with fellow students cannot be denied.
Thus, the Association for Renaissance Martial Arts is an educational non-profit organization dedicated to the study and practice of historical fencing and the exploration and promotion of our Western martial heritage. The ARMA focuses on the interpretation and legitimate reconstruction of Medieval and Renaissance combat systems as a modern discipline. The ARMA’s efforts are directed toward resurrecting and recreating a legitimate craft of European fighting skills in a manner that is historically valid and martially sound. Join us in exploring and reviving an exciting world of history and culture!
Programs and Efforts
The
ARMA
represents a
modern effort at researching, reconstructing, and resurrecting a
legitimate craft of Medieval and Renaissance martial arts.
ARMA material is based exclusively on documented Western martial
culture and experience in handling real weaponry. Effort is directed at
an approximation of historical fighting skills through a curriculum of
interpreted techniques, principles, concepts, and methods for using
swords, spears, shields, staffs, daggers, and grappling arts. The ARMA
therefore views historical fencing from the perspective of the art of
using all arms.
The ARMA System is founded upon an appreciation of the context under which European combatives of the Medieval and Renaissance era existed. The ARMA recognizes that fencing of earlier centuries was a martial art in the truest and original meaning of the European term –armed and unarmed fighting skills so named for the “Arts of Mars”, Roman god of war. ARMA’s Training Methodology emphasizes the “Martial” in martial arts, and does not suffer the pretense of posing and pretending.
The ARMA attempts to
provide
students and enthusiasts with realistic and effective understanding of
martial skills, and not merely interesting intellectual recreation or
academic demonstration of period styles. The subject is viewed by ARMA
as a means of appreciating our martial heritage and its ingenuity, the
adversity of life in earlier ages and the need for practical
self-defense, as well as developing our fitness and character. We offer a National Training Program
of Workshops and Seminar classes in Renaissance martial arts designed
for both novice enthusiasts and serious practitioners. See
also Students and Ranking Within ARMA.
We provide a private Member’s area of study material sand training
aids. We also feature a Youth page
to help educate kids and teens
under 16
in Chivalric values and develop interest in the positive aspects of the
martial heritage of Western civilization. The ARMA system for study of
Medieval and Renaissance fencing, as presented in classes, seminars,
and the National Training Program workshops utilizes the our
Study Approach and Training Methodology within the ARMA System. In simplest turns, the ARMA
Study Approach is the
reliance upon the source manuals of the historical European Masters of
Defence as the sole authority for reconstruction; the reliance on
historically accurate replicas weaponry; and trust upon hands-on
interpretation using all of these. The ARMA Training
Methodology is the use
of wooden weapons (wasters) and blunts for exercises and drills; the
use of padded-weapons for free-play (or contact-sparring); and the use
of sharps for test-cutting practice. The overwhelming evidence persuasively convinces us
that historically, training in Renaissance martial arts involved a
number of key practices: the first, partnered exchanges of attack and
defense sequences in order to learn the fundamental execution of core
movements with regard to certain key principles of fighting; the second, exercise repetitions of techniques in order to
strike strongly and quickly with accuracy; the third, conducting forms
of play-fighting in order to acquire adversarial counter-timing, the
perception to be deceptive while not being deceived, and a grasp of the
tactical application of techniques; and the fifth, performance of
combinations of actions in a open-ended chain of spontaneous movements
so as to demonstrate coordination and fluid motion. This then, is the
central effort of ARMA's system and curricula.
ARMA
practice reflects
that
while later fencing became synonymous with gentlemanly duels of the
single-sword, historical European martial arts represented a diversity
of sophisticated and highly effective styles using a variety of
weaponry and armors for war, judicial combat, and personal
self-defense. ARMA classes reflect understanding that all-out the life
or death fighting of Medieval combat and Renaissance frays, rencounters, and
streetfights are far removed from the more limited academic fencing of
both 18th - 19th century
gentlemen and today’s sporting styles.
ARMA is no
mere “Internet network”; it is a truly
international organization with students or members across
North America and in several countries studying under a proven system
of historical fencing practice. Members hold as objectives:
researching, conducting mock-fights, and sharing experience, insights,
and practice opportunities. A major ARMA goal is to reclaim our martial
heritage from its myths and misconceptions. ARMA is not a
fantasy society, role-playing organization, or theatrical-performance
troupe. These activities are contrary to sincere pursuit of a genuine
martial discipline. We don't pay lipservice to the source teachings of
our craft and then do displays and fighting games, we try to revive the
lost tradition as a modern discipline.
|
|
|
|
Note: ARMA¨ - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright © 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright © 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site © 1999-2002 by ARMA. |
|