Postby Bill Welch » Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:34 pm
I completely agree that sport fencing, SCA, and other non-combatative forms of "sword play" are just that non-combatative forms, and one should be careful when tring to interject these other forms into the more combative form, that ARMA teaches. <img src="/forum/images/icons/laugh.gif" alt="" />
ROD-THORNTON put it great on one of the other threads on this forum
He wrote
"Others may correct me, however I believe that classical fencing is also somewhat different then historical fencing, which I interpret to mean what we do under the "ARMA method." To that point, historical fencing as reconstructed in the ARMA method, is, as I understand it, simply a combative discipline to fight well with martially-sound actions using a variety of western edged and non-edged non-projectile weapons. I do not think prize-playing or free-play events serve any competitive sporting purpose, but rather only to demonstrate efficacy of the three T's....namely "technique, training, and talent" as a pragmatic fighter."
I think his post is right on the money. Great explaination Rod.
<img src="/forum/images/icons/grin.gif" alt="" />
Thanks, Bill
You have got to love the violence inherent in the system.
Your mother is a hamster and your father smell of Elderberries.