Postby Rod-Thornton » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:41 pm
"Hickory!
Oak is a tad bit to brittle! My experience is that hickory lasts longer...."
I am not so quick to opine in the absolute. I own both sorts of wooden wasters....and here's what I can tell you about each.
1. Hickory - sure, harder, Raven waster is good, but when it failed (after 1.5 weeks of service!) it simply CRACKED and split right along the whole length. This was right along the same lines as when the wife and laid our hickory hardwood floors....not pre-drilled...and c-r-a-c-k-! the whole length would split! (True enough, Carina at Little Raven gave me a prompt replacement).
OAK:. Doesn't seem to be as hard. More poruous and open grained. Made two for about 9bucks each though by tracing oak shelving (grade 1 board) and table-sawing/planing to finish. It however did NOT split along the lines, but rather slowly splintered away to an unsuitable condition..... splintered abit...we peel away the chip and re-sand it...splintered abit on occassion...repeat as often as necessary. In short, more of a true "waster" in that it wasted away. Both have lasted about the same time in service.
Now to offset each....the hickory one was more pricey being commercially made, while the oak ones were less pricey being mroe do it yourself.
Not to sound wishy-washy....but both have their pros and cons in my opinion. To my mind, the question becomes one of whether or not one is handy with woodworking and powertools. If so, maybe opt for cost and occassional woodwork....if not, go commercial and select a tighter-grained wood from a company that will stand behind their product when it fails....cuz it will.
Rod W. Thornton, Scholar Adept (Longsword)
ARMA-Virginia Beach Study Group