Stance Changes

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

Jerrit Reed
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:07 pm

Stance Changes

Postby Jerrit Reed » Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:36 pm

What would make a combantant change stances/guards? Would one change for tactical reasons? Or to perform a better counter?

Joel Norman
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:39 pm

Re: Stance Changes

Postby Joel Norman » Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:57 pm

Jerrit Reed wrote:What would make a combantant change stances/guards? Would one change for tactical reasons? Or to perform a better counter?


The term "tactical reasons" is kind of all-encompassing, so I would say yes to that one. There are lots of tactical reasons why you should change stances/guards for both offense and defense. One of the reasons that strikes me is that changing positions keeps your opponent guessing as to what you are going to do; if you are static and remain in one position, it's easier to find a way to hit you.
Let the saints be joyful in glory: let them sing aloud upon their beds.
6 Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a twoedged sword in their hand;
7 To execute vengeance upon the heathen, and punishments upon the people;
Psalms 149:5 - 7

User avatar
Corey Roberts
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: Pyeongtaek, South Korea

Postby Corey Roberts » Mon Oct 27, 2008 4:22 pm

Stance transitions are performed relatively continuously and naturally in the course of a fight, you might change wards in response to actions of your opponent, or you might change guards as a result of your own actions. Let's say I'm standing in Vom Tag and I throw a Scheitelhau at my opponent which is voided, because I don't want to just be sitting pretty with my hands stuck out mid motion and just freeze into a vulnerable posture from which my opponent can kill me; naturally my motion will continue into Alber where I'm ready to respond with something else. The last thing you want to do is just sit fat and happy while your opponent clobbers you; so stance transitions are merely a natural flow from one ready position to another.
--Scholar-Adept
Pyeongtaek
Republic of Korea

User avatar
Jeremiah Backhaus
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 6:50 am
Location: West Bend, WI

Postby Jeremiah Backhaus » Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:05 pm

Jerrit,

You are asking the wrong question man. Instead, 'why would I stand still in a fight?' If I lock into a stance and hold it, then I am leaving so many portions of my person open that an opponent of any skill would be able to read not only the proper course of action, but also your response.

Each stance/guard/hut that you can find yourself in during a fight has pro's and con's. They need to be used as they are best fitting. To keep your opponent guessing, to give you more options in the fight, to create openings, to keep your muscles from stiffening (if you have been fighting for a while), etc. There is no simple answer to your question - except: don't not change stances, that would be your death.

-Jeremiah
Repetitio mater studorum est.


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.