Parrying attacks to the hips/waistline

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Eric White
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:15 pm
Location: New Jersey

Postby Eric White » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:35 am

Stacy Clifford wrote:
Greg Coffman wrote: John C's 14 guards (which I severely doubt he uses or would even recommend anymore) seem to be his own attempt at describing the range of positions in which one can hold the sword.


Greg,

Yes, the guards are still important. John has told me as much that the new curriculum doesn't really change any of the basic elements we've been practicing for years, it changes the context of them and how we use them. All the old guards, steps, cuts, etc. are still there.

Eric,

If you haven't already seen this article, it'll help you catch up on stances and terminology a bit.

http://www.thearma.org/essays/StancesIntro.htm


I hadn't seen that essay yet. Thanks!

User avatar
Stacy Clifford
Posts: 1126
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Postby Stacy Clifford » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:54 am

Greg Coffman wrote:Stacy,
The 14 guards presented in Medieval Swordsmanship are not the same as the historical guards that we practice. I never said that guards are not important. I said that the historical guards are the ones we should practice and not the watered down versions in Medieval Swordsmanship.


OK, I see what you mean now. I haven't looked at Medieval Swordsmanship in so long that I didn't associate "14 guards" with that book. I agree with you that the guards presented in that book are out of date with current research and should not be used for practice any longer. My misunderstanding.
0==[>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Stacy Clifford
Free-Scholar
ARMA Houston, TX

Peter Giannini
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:35 pm
Location: NJ

Postby Peter Giannini » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:05 pm

Greg,

I have been starting to train with Eric and have many of the same questions that he has.

The strike of wrath, "zornhau" (zorn=wrath, hau=strike), is a diagonal overhand cut. When spoken of it usually refers to a right-to-left cut, but everything can be done on the opposite side. When "he displaces it," that can be understood as a counter cut. He displaces the zornhau by cutting against it.


What do you mean when you say cutting against the zornhau to displace it. Does that mean you are making a cut that interferes with your opponents blade therefore displacing it, or are you moving out of the way and counter striking in order to counter it.

User avatar
Randall Pleasant
Posts: 872
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Flower Mound, Texas, USA

Postby Randall Pleasant » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:57 pm

Peter Giannini wrote:What do you mean when you say cutting against the zornhau to displace it.

If someone cuts a right zorn at you their blade will be coming at your left shoulder at roughly 45 degrees. If you also cut a right zorn at their head it if possible for your blade to cut through their face and into the flat of the oncoming blade. Your edge impacting the flat of the other blade will knock the other blade down and to the side so that it does not cut you. This is a single time cut that provides both offense and defense. Of course, timing is everything when counter cutting.

If your counter cut fails the cut the adversary then at the end of displaying their blade you should finish in a lower hanging with your point inches from their face. The full sequence of followup techiques are described in Ringeck and other German longsword manuals.
Ran Pleasant

User avatar
Greg Coffman
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 5:33 pm
Location: Abilene

Postby Greg Coffman » Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:29 pm

Randall Pleasant wrote:
Peter Giannini wrote:What do you mean when you say cutting against the zornhau to displace it.

If someone cuts a right zorn at you their blade will be coming at your left shoulder at roughly 45 degrees. If you also cut a right zorn at their head it if possible for your blade to cut through their face and into the flat of the oncoming blade. Your edge impacting the flat of the other blade will knock the other blade down and to the side so that it does not cut you. This is a single time cut that provides both offense and defense. Of course, timing is everything when counter cutting.

If your counter cut fails the cut the adversary then at the end of displaying their blade you should finish in a lower hanging with your point inches from their face. The full sequence of followup techiques are described in Ringeck and other German longsword manuals.


I meant exactly what Ran said. And yes, go read Ringeck.

Does that mean you are making a cut that interferes with your opponents blade therefore displacing it, or are you moving out of the way and counter striking in order to counter it.

That would be voiding and cutting in the nach.
Greg Coffman
Scholar-Adept
ARMA Lubbock, TX


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.