Postby Frederico Martins » Fri Sep 24, 2010 6:41 am
Hi,
Stacy, I've heard more people working with Meyer, it is very nice to see other people taking the staff work seriously. For me it makes sense what you say, with a longer and heavier staff, rotational strikes start to be much slower and became less usefull, so for that staff a thrust attack would be much more efficient.
As a discaimer: p We use full wood staffs (usually quince or lotus), those are not rattan or lighter substitutes so our strikes are still very powerfull and if any lands without control is almost guaranteed a broken bone.
as you can see in the freeplay most strikes aren't controlled at faster speed, and there is only control when it is clear that the opponent will not be able to parry, so not to hurt him, sometimes, that is not so clear.
I personally prefer a shorter staff, no much longer than the size of a man, to be able to do rotational strikes including ascending ones but still at a safe range, but a good understanding of different sizes and weights is definitly a great study, i've worked mainly with staffs from 60cms to 80cms (at one hand) to 120 to 145cms that still need slight changes in technique, but would like to try longer ones too.
hi Sripol, it is a portuguese art yes, but I like to emphasize that it is of european origins in general because of all the similarities with other arts and material, we just had luck that it was continually practiced until today in Portugal. and in portuguese we say "esgrima" not "escrima" same thing anyway, the word not the relation with filipino martial arts.
Steven, we have a rating system yes, developed by my master in the video there, related to the technical program so it is all well "synthesized" and documented.
thanks for your comments everyone, Cheers!