Is there any side sowrd[cut and thrust] mainly for thrusting

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

YIzhe LIU
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:21 am

Is there any side sowrd[cut and thrust] mainly for thrusting

Postby YIzhe LIU » Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:48 pm

I heard some one discribed that side sword[cut and thrust sowrd] had two sorts of.One kind is mainly for thrusting,they had narrow and thick blades, another is mainly for cutting,they had wide blades.

Is that true????

User avatar
Sal Bertucci
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:04 pm
Location: Denver area, CO

Postby Sal Bertucci » Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:31 am

Mostly. You have to understand that when these manuals were written these people just called everything a "sword" or a "rapier".

FYI: "Cut & Thrust" is NOT a historical term, but one we find useful to distinguish a later cutting sword from a rapier, which we describe as more "thrust oriented". Admittedly though the lines can get pretty blurry on specific swords.

One of the ways to distinguish between the two is, as you mentioned, blade design. Wider narrower blades are needed for effective cutting, while thinner more geometric blades are better suited to thrusting.


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.