Armor of proof

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Brandon Paul Heslop
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:56 am
Location: West Valley City, Utah
Contact:

Postby Brandon Paul Heslop » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:39 am

Benjamin Parker wrote:I meant an arquebus or an early hook gun or a pistol but what I'm trying to say is did knights or any large group of people in armor of proof charge directly into a line of firearms 15th-16th century and come out largely unscathed


Well, it all really depends upon what you're talking about, Ben. Do you mean as individuals, or as a unit? In both cases, the answer is gonna be yes and no. I have to agree largely with Mr. Curtis on this one. The decline of western knighthood is not a straight line. It didn't all happen at once. Really, there is ample evidence that knighthood began its decline in ernest after the Battle Agincourt, or perhaps as early as Poiters or Crecy. But they did not simply fade away.

In fact, the greatest advancements in armour were achieved after these battles, and can be seen as measures to ensure the continuing relevance of knights in warfare. And it worked for a long time. Heck, there were mounted English, French and German lancers equipped with helmet and complete breastplate, and armed with sabre and double-tipped lances as late as WWI! They were of limited usefulness, but they were still deployed in areas and situations where they would make an impact.

http://www.gwpda.org/photos/bin04/imag0348.jpg

http://www.gwpda.org/photos/bin05/imag0472.jpg

Did groups of knights charge gunners? Absolutely. Did many of the come out "unscathed," and having got their better of their hated enemies? Certainly. Did some of the get wounded, killed, or have their horses fall beneath them? Were some totally destroyed or ruted by gunfire? Yes. Accounts of battles tend to record the big stuff, (like who won, who lost, and why). We do get some surprisingly detailed descriptions of actual movements and their results from time-to-time, but not as often as one might think. So, you're asking a complicated question here that has no easy answer. This is the best you're probably gonna get.

One small point, though: the biggest danger to knights by the period you're talking about really isn't individual handgunners. Its pikemen + handgunners + cannonfire. There's a rather nasty story about a French knight guarding a tower near this period, who got his hand completely blown off by a cannon ball.

-B.
Thys beeth ye lettr yt stondÿ in hys sygte \
To teche . or to play . or ellys for to fygte...

"This [is] the letter (way,) [for] standing in his (the opponent's) sight \
[either] to teach, or to play, or else for fight..."

-Man yt Wol.

User avatar
Benjamin Parker
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:51 pm
Location: The back of your mind

Postby Benjamin Parker » Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:26 am

I mean as unit :) By the way the men in that first picture looked a lot like french cuirassiers
My kingdom for a profound/insightful Signature!


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.