All scarred up...an opinion question

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Alan Forbes
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:11 pm

Postby Alan Forbes » Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:57 am

I remember reading an account a few years ago from a man who served as a Cossack guard to Czar Nicolas II. He described part of his training to be a Cossack where he was given the choice of being cut with a sword or having one of his bones broken. The reason for this he said was to condition young Cossacks to learn that they could still fight after being injured. Given the longer healing time of a broken bone, I'm sure most of them would have chosen to be cut by a sword.

Even in our sparring we see the action stop when someone is hurt even slightly. In real combat I'm sure the action continued because to stop meant to loss or worse death.


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.