diff between the German and Italian longsword sys?

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Matt Easton
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 2:23 pm
Location: London, England
Contact:

Re: diff between the German and Italian longsword

Postby Matt Easton » Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:31 am

Hi Brian and Shane;

Basically we seem to agree that while the Liechtenauer and Dei Liberi traditions have a lot in common, there are some differences (in both theory and execution).
This is good, and I think it is the 'normal' view held in the WMA world now.

Regarding Sydney Anglo's comments on Fiore - I must say that, having had the chance to have a brief conversation with him in John Clements' presence, he was honest about the fact that he had not spent much time looking at the three versions of Fior di Battaglia. He was surprised when I told him that the Morgan version contains things not in the Getty version, and that the Morgan is not simply an abridged version of Getty - rather they seem to share a common source.
Also, we should remember that when Sydney Anglo wrote his book it was early days in the study of WMA, and he could not do an in-depth analysis of all those treatises by himself - he wrote a pioneering work, but IMO it should only be used as a loose guide now, as there is a lot of knowledge out there now that supercedes it.

Going back to what Shane said:
Essentially I agree - however, i do think there is a fair amount of attacking and taking-the-initiative in Fiore. There are also a fair number of described feints, which of course involve attacking first and commanding the opponent ('Vor' basically). Also, the text of the Posta tell us a lot about how to attack - which attacks to use and which Posta work best against which other Posta (specifically discussed in the pollaxe section). So, I do agree that Fiore has *alot* more counter playing and waiting than Doebringer, Von Danzig or Ringeck. But that's not all the story - it just seems to be Fiore's preference in what he shows (in fact it is a preference we could loosely call 'Italian', as it runs through Vadi and the Bolognese school - so all the early Italian material we have), but the offensive stuff is there, mainly wrapped up in the text rather than the illustrated plays.

I will give one basic example:
Fiore states that if your opponent is standing in Posta Fenestra, then traverse to the side his weapon is on, and cut at his hands (on the outside).

This is simple, offensive and as it happens, quite similar to some of the advice in the Liechtenauer tradition (not surprisingly).

Anyway, I've droned on for too long <img src="/forum/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />,

Regards,

Matt

User avatar
James_Knowles
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 7:15 pm
Location: Utah, USA

Re: diff between the German and Italian longsword

Postby James_Knowles » Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:26 pm

there *really* are differences in physical reality ... people like things simple ... we *have* to acknowledge differences between treatises

I obviously wansn't very clear, and I think you oversimplified what I was saying. <img src="/forum/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" />

I didn't say anything to the differences. Yes, they exist even within closely-related texts. Yes, the must be investigated, debated, and otherwise scrutinized. The academic side is a primary attraction for me.

I was simply issuing a general word of caution about focusing just on differences. I've lived in academia long enough to know that it's human nature get caught up in meaningless minutia. We can discuss the variations of colour on the ticks, but the topic of study is the elephant carrying the ticks. <img src="/forum/images/icons/laugh.gif" alt="" />

Don't take my comments as specific commentary on what you or any other individual has said. I'm speaking to the general, not the specific.
James Knowles
ARMA Provo, UT


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.