Swimming in armor

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

Sripol Asanasavest
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:31 am

Postby Sripol Asanasavest » Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:30 pm

Hmmm... the armors were kindda hallow...like steel ships.... Do you think you would float if you were wearing one? lol Has anybody ever tested this? Maybe that's why in ancient Siam, they preferred steel armors than leathers and silks... Just a guest, though...

User avatar
Sal Bertucci
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:04 pm
Location: Denver area, CO

Postby Sal Bertucci » Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:56 pm

Wow, just wow.

I have a quick question: Are you asking an earnest question based on a total lack of understanding, or do you just enjoy being a Troll?

I encourage you to be honest in your reply because I'm not being facetious in the least.

Sripol Asanasavest
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:31 am

Postby Sripol Asanasavest » Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:14 am

Troll! Don't call me a troll! Why are you pissed off with a little criticism?

User avatar
Sal Bertucci
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:04 pm
Location: Denver area, CO

Postby Sal Bertucci » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:18 am

B/c what you're saying makes no sense unless you read it with buckets of sarcasm. If my question offended you then I apologize, but I refuse to waste my time answering questions for people who don't really want answers, and just like to poke the hornet's nest.

Why are you pissed off with a little criticism?


Most people prefer it when criticism makes sense. I can take MEANINGFUL criticism all day long (With a break every once and a while), but tell me; Do you honestly think this is criticism?

Hmmm... the armors were kindda hallow...like steel ships.... Do you think you would float if you were wearing one? lol


No offense, but to me this looks like a poorly thought out, nonsensically combative response.

However; assuming that I made an incorrect assumption I will answer your "criticism": Yes, armor is hollow on the inside, which can increase buoyancy. Yet, armor also has many holes in it. Like for your head and legs and arms and waist. Last time I checked steel ships tend to sink when you put holes in the places below the surface of the water.

And actually they prefer metal armors to leather or silk ALL OVER THE WORLD. I would think it has something to do with improved protection of steel, but I could be wrong.

User avatar
Greg Coffman
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 5:33 pm
Location: Abilene

Postby Greg Coffman » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:41 am

Plate harness is only hollow when somebody is not wearing it. Otherwise, it is filled with a person and all the layers of cloth worn between the person and the metal. Those layers of cloth would quickly take on water and get soaked.

The virtue of making a boat out of metal is that the metal can be as strong as comparable constructions, like wood, while being thinner and lighter. Buoyancy is based on displacing a certain volume of water that has as much or more mass than your boat. A boat floats because it doesn't just displace the volume of the metal on the outside, but the entire volume of the portion of the boat under the water because it is sealed. Armor is not sealed. It doesn't displace the volume of the whole person. It lets water in.

Sripol, I wasn't sure what to do with your post either because it is just so far fetched and ill-considered. And what you posted wasn't criticism; it was a comment or question. You weren't criticizing anybody. It irks us because we like for this forum to be for the purposes of "intelligent discourse" and serious discussion.
Greg Coffman
Scholar-Adept
ARMA Lubbock, TX

Sripol Asanasavest
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:31 am

Postby Sripol Asanasavest » Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:41 am

I'm just saying: I'm not quite sure how it would really work out in real life situation. I thought you can try it out in real life. I want to try it because I use to swim competitively. That's all! :o And speaking of which, I wonder which takes longer to sink a steel boat or wooden boat?

User avatar
Sal Bertucci
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:04 pm
Location: Denver area, CO

Postby Sal Bertucci » Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:52 am

That would depend on the size of the hole in it. :wink:

User avatar
CalebChow
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Postby CalebChow » Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:08 am

Sripol Asanasavest wrote:I'm just saying: I'm not quite sure how it would really work out in real life situation. I thought you can try it out in real life.


Are you trying to kill us? :shock:

Well, if someone ever gets around trying it, make sure to have a long snorkel or some hand held oxygen...
"...But beware the Juggler, to whom the unseemliest losses are and who is found everywhere in the world, until all are put away." - Joachim Meyer

Sripol Asanasavest
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:31 am

Postby Sripol Asanasavest » Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:43 am

Well, you can stay on the shallow end...! lol ...in a pool I mean!

LafayetteCCurtis
Posts: 421
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:00 pm

Postby LafayetteCCurtis » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:41 am

Apparently, somebody did a test already:

http://www.myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic ... t=swimming

and the conclusions, apparently, are that it is just possible to swim short distances in harness, though only slowly and laboriously. Sustaining it for any distance--and in anything but calm waters--would be a different matter entirely, and on the whole swimming certainly doesn't seem to be a preferable solution when medieval technology provided for numerous ways of boating, wading/fording, and bridging (as in the following quote from Philippe de Commynes)!

SO as it had been decided all the lords left Étamps, after staying there a few more days, and they marched to Saint-Mathurin de Larchant and Moret [-sur-Loing] in the Gâtinais. Lord Charles and the Bretons stayed in these two small towns. The count of Charolais camped in a large meadow on the edge of the river Seine and ordered everyone to bring a post to which to tie his horse. He had seven or eight small boats brought on carts and many wine-barrel staves to make a bridge over the Seine because the lords had no other way of crossing it. My lord of Dunois accompanied him in a litter because his gout prevented him from riding; his standard was carried behind him. As soon as they came to the river they launched the boats which they had brought and reached a small island which was about in the middle. Some archers landed and skirmished with horsemen who were defending the passage on the other side where Marshal Joachim and [Jean de] Salazar were present. The place was very disadvantageous for them since it was very steep and covered with vines. There was a considerable amount of artillery on the Burgundian side under the care of the famous gunner Master Girault [de Samien] and others, who had been captured in the battle of Montlhéry fighting on the royal side. In the end it was necessary for Joachim and Salazar to abandon the passage and they withdrew to Paris. That evening a bridge was built as far as the island, and immediately the count of Charolais had a large tent erected and slept the night in it with fifty household troops.

At daybreak a large number of coopers were set to work to make barrels from the wood which had been brought and before midday the bridge was completed to the other side of the river. Immediately the count of Charolais crossed to the other side and had his many large tents pitched there. He ordered all his army and artillery across the bridge and camped on a hill sloping towards the river, and his army made a very fine sight for those who were still behind.

All day only his troops were able to cross. Next day at dawn the dukes of Brittany and Berry crossed with all their army; they found the bridge very fine even though it had been constructed quickly.

User avatar
CalebChow
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Postby CalebChow » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:03 am

LafayetteCCurtis wrote:Apparently, somebody did a test already:

http://www.myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic ... t=swimming

and the conclusions, apparently, are that it is just possible to swim short distances in harness, though only slowly and laboriously. Sustaining it for any distance--and in anything but calm waters--would be a different matter entirely, and on the whole swimming certainly doesn't seem to be a preferable solution when medieval technology provided for numerous ways of boating, wading/fording, and bridging (as in the following quote from Philippe de Commynes)!

SO as it had been decided all the lords left Étamps, after staying there a few more days, and they marched to Saint-Mathurin de Larchant and Moret [-sur-Loing] in the Gâtinais. Lord Charles and the Bretons stayed in these two small towns. The count of Charolais camped in a large meadow on the edge of the river Seine and ordered everyone to bring a post to which to tie his horse. He had seven or eight small boats brought on carts and many wine-barrel staves to make a bridge over the Seine because the lords had no other way of crossing it. My lord of Dunois accompanied him in a litter because his gout prevented him from riding; his standard was carried behind him. As soon as they came to the river they launched the boats which they had brought and reached a small island which was about in the middle. Some archers landed and skirmished with horsemen who were defending the passage on the other side where Marshal Joachim and [Jean de] Salazar were present. The place was very disadvantageous for them since it was very steep and covered with vines. There was a considerable amount of artillery on the Burgundian side under the care of the famous gunner Master Girault [de Samien] and others, who had been captured in the battle of Montlhéry fighting on the royal side. In the end it was necessary for Joachim and Salazar to abandon the passage and they withdrew to Paris. That evening a bridge was built as far as the island, and immediately the count of Charolais had a large tent erected and slept the night in it with fifty household troops.

At daybreak a large number of coopers were set to work to make barrels from the wood which had been brought and before midday the bridge was completed to the other side of the river. Immediately the count of Charolais crossed to the other side and had his many large tents pitched there. He ordered all his army and artillery across the bridge and camped on a hill sloping towards the river, and his army made a very fine sight for those who were still behind.

All day only his troops were able to cross. Next day at dawn the dukes of Brittany and Berry crossed with all their army; they found the bridge very fine even though it had been constructed quickly.


Lol that Benjamin Parker gone and done hijacked my thread!! :x

Haha, great results, anyway! Great to see a solid test done on this. Thanks for the link!
"...But beware the Juggler, to whom the unseemliest losses are and who is found everywhere in the world, until all are put away." - Joachim Meyer


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.