Rapier styles differences

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
RaduRazvan
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Cernavoda, Romania

Rapier styles differences

Postby RaduRazvan » Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 pm

Hello everyone! I am quite new at studying Renaissance martial arts; I am particulary interested in rapier fighting styles. In my searches for more in-depth knowledge i saw there are a few 'major' rapier schools (Italian, Spanish, German, English, French), each with its own theoretical foundation. It would be really helpful for me if someone could spare some time and briefly explain me what are the main differences betwen these rapier schools.

Thank you for your time and patience.

User avatar
Allen Johnson
Posts: 638
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 1:43 am
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: Rapier styles differences

Postby Allen Johnson » Tue Apr 19, 2005 10:32 pm

I feel that there really isnt much difference in the different schools (regions) just as long as you stick in the same general time period and make sure you are working with similar weapons. Since everyone borrowed from everyone else, and the term 'rapier' can be a generic and oft debated term there is lots of room in there. Your earlier cut and thrust blades like in Marrozzo will differ in technique from your later, more slender 'true rapiers' seen in Capo Ferro and the like. John Clements has a really good article on rapiers and covers tons of ground on all aspects of them. See here: http://www.thearma.org/spotlight.htm
"Why is there a picture of a man with a sword in his head on your desk?" -friends inquiry

User avatar
Brian Hunt
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 2:03 am
Location: Price, Utah
Contact:

Re: Rapier styles differences

Postby Brian Hunt » Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:00 am

I would add that there are mainly two schools of "rapier." Italian and Spanish. Meyer has a rapier section in his german manual, but it looks more like a cut and thrust sword than a "true" rapier. There is also a rapier manual that is written in english, but with the way my head hurts tonight, I cannot remember the author's name off the top of my head, but his is basicly an Italian style. Since the weapon dictates the way it is used in many ways, I feel that there is too much made about "styles." It is simply about fighting with a sharpened, 4-foot knitting needle.

hope this helps.

Brian Hunt.
GFS.
Tuus matar hamsterius est, et tuus pater buca sabucorum fundor!

http://www.paulushectormair.com
http://www.emerytelcom.net/users/blhunt/sales.htm

User avatar
Jon Pellett
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:15 pm
Location: Calgary, AB

Re: Rapier styles differences

Postby Jon Pellett » Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:53 am

It does depend on what you mean by rapier; Meyer calls his weapon a rapier, but WMAists tend to call it 'sidesword'. The impression I get is that Meyer's stuff is based on the Italian, but thoroughly Germanized. Jake Norwood would probably know. Stefan Dieke at Freifechter focuses on that style. One source claimed that he was taught by Marozzo, though this is dubious.

There are several rapier manuals in English. There is the Elizabethan translation of DiGrassi, which is generally considered 'sidesword.' Saviolo is Italian or Spanish-Italian, depending who you ask. Swetnam is pretty distinctive, and probably qualifies as properly English. Pallas Armata I don't know enough about to say.

Spanish style involves holding your blade outstretched pointing straight at your opponent, stepping around in a circle, and doing tricksy stuff to him. It actually uses quite a lot of cutting as well as thrusting. Its theory is heavily based on abtruse geometry and philosophy. There is an article about it here.

Italian has a couple of different branches, IIRC. It's not my bag, but there is a Bolognese style and a... not-Bolognese style?

Anyway, good luck, it is a fascinating subject.

Cheers

User avatar
RaduRazvan
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Cernavoda, Romania

Re: Rapier styles differences

Postby RaduRazvan » Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:32 pm

Thanks a lot for your help, you clarified lots of issues for me. I downloaded some scanned manuals, mostly Italian, and I will read them to find out more. I wasn't able to find the "Academie De L'Espee" manual, by Girard Thibault, which i heard it is one of the best manuals on destreza (and it's also in French, so i can read it); i found two manuals by Ettenhard, though, on the subject of la 'verdadera destreza', but they are in Spanish, a language i don't speak.

User avatar
Jake_Norwood
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:46 am
Location: Clarksville, TN

Re: Rapier styles differences

Postby Jake_Norwood » Wed Apr 20, 2005 4:59 pm

The impression I get is that Meyer's stuff is based on the Italian, but thoroughly Germanized. Jake Norwood would probably know.


Working on the translation still, in all of my "Free time." Unfortunately it's on the back burner with more important projects up front for now.

That being said, it's definitely something more of a "cut and thrust" type of fight as opposed to, say, something like Capo Ferro.

Jake
Sen. Free Scholar
ARMA Deputy Director

Tobias Hartranft
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 5:34 pm

Re: Rapier styles differences

Postby Tobias Hartranft » Sun May 15, 2005 7:44 pm

The Spanish style also holds a unique difference from other sword styles that's worth being mentioned, the noteworthy idea that one does not lunge in Spanish style, but rather steps in quickly upon seeing the oppurtunity, unlike pretty much every other rapier style in existance during it's usage. Another difference Spanish holds from the others styles is that you raise your arm to a point where the sword tip is an inch or two LOWER than your hand, causing you to disengage over the opponent's blade, a quite unique technique.


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.