Postby Francisco Uribe » Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:34 am
Just to help keeping things clear on this area.
According to my own reading and research on the style proposed by Carranza, this would have been developed not for rapiers, but for cut and thrust blades.
Pacheco, who must be the sole person who wrote the most about la verdadera destreza, describes cuts performed on wide circles. Such actions do not make any sense if using a true rapier.
In the spanish language the term "ropera" appears for the first time in an inventory of property for the Duke Don Álvaro de Zúñiga in 1468.
The term "espada ropera" or just "ropera" is very loosely used in spanish. It only refers to a tool that can be worn while in civillian attire...and is not indicative of a thrusting or a cut and thrust weapon.
Eventually la destreza de Carranza evolved with the years to a thrusting play, much more proper of a true rapier.
I believe that la destreza de Carranza is much similar to what George Silver does, than to the italian masters of true rapier, considering the type of tool involved.
And by the same token, la destreza vulgar is neither a school of true rapier fencing. It predates Carranza's ideas and it is probably what the common and noble was taught and used.... at least until Carranza.
In that regards it would be much more related to medieval swordplay than Carranza's propositions. If we were to believe that the term Ropera was in use as eraly as 1460s, we can safely asume that these swords were not used in a foyning fashion, characteristic of the true rapier..
Salud!
Francisco Uribe GFS
ARMA-Lansing
ARMA-Chile
Increible facedor de entuertos
furiber@yahoo.com