I have a question about swords that have asymmetrical hilts(with knukle bar etc...): why the double edged C & T was prevalent over the back sword? With such an hilt you can't shift blade.
If single edged swords can cut better then double edged ones, coeteris paribus, or cut just as well and be lighter, there must be a reason, which I'm missing, why the double edged blade was more common.
Other then the coup of Jarnac, I do not know any effective use of the back edge. On the other hand, if most, if not all, cuts are performed with the true edge, it would seem logical to assist the function of the true edge with a blade shape dedicated to it, this should give a light sword that cuts well or an average sword that cuts very well. Swordmen and swordmakers were not stupid, so I think I'm missing a good point.
