Western Boxing

European historical unarmed fighting techniques & methods

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Bill Welch
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:39 am
Location: Knoxville, TN

Re: Western Boxing

Postby Bill Welch » Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:35 pm

I think that somewhere in this long thread that someone mentioned that it was expected that a warrior at this time trained from youth to be able to wrestle and strike.

So striking was probably not spacifically mentioned in fight texts for the same reason that there are not a lot of sword and shield manuals, because warriors were already expected to know how to do it.
Thanks, Bill
You have got to love the violence inherent in the system.
Your mother is a hamster and your father smell of Elderberries.

User avatar
philippewillaume
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:51 am
Location: UK, windsor
Contact:

Re: Western Boxing

Postby philippewillaume » Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:41 am

Yes Joachim in fact it is very similar to way we use atemi (i.e. strike with whatever knee, foot, elbow fist palm) in aikido. it seems as well the ringeck uses it as a get out jail free card (gouging, check muscle tear and so on)
He seems quite keen on kicking (but only in Armour) though he mention that you need to be careful that he does not grab you leg)

Bill
Hum I just do not know you see, because as you said we are not told how to grab but just to grab with just a little precision. So we can assume that people would know what action would be associate to that. Ringeck tell us to strike with hand approximately closed in on occurrence which seems to refer to something knew
And besides we know there was peasant fencing, wrestling so there was very probably peasant punching as well. Plus the fact as Joachim mentioned that we do defend against strike.
The things that is puzzling with strike is that fiore and Ringeck seems to be quite specific as to where and when to strike and that indicate that striking arts were not that developed nor really integrated to ringen.
One Ringeck to bring them all In the Land of Windsor where phlip phlop live.

User avatar
R.J. Stringer
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 1:10 pm
Location: Dallas, Tx

Re: Western Boxing

Postby R.J. Stringer » Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:31 pm

IMHO the fighter with the most accurate self knowledge of his skillset will prevail. Ive been overwhelmed by sheer numbers in a brawl (yeah, i really thought we could "lick em all"), and Ive taken men most definitely larger and more "skilled" than myself through sheer tenacity and viciousness of attack (skeered silly will do that for ya <img src="/forum/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" />) Lumps, scars, and beer-stories aside..sometimes theres an opportunity to win, and sometimes there isnt..but if you are realistic about what you can, and cannot do you'll likely be OK.

User avatar
Dan Kanagie
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: Western Boxing

Postby Dan Kanagie » Sat Mar 25, 2006 10:31 pm

This is a debate for the ages. In the history of BKB, there are multitudes of stories of one punch KO's. Striking, like any other art is effective if used properly. There is a science to everything in fighting. Also, Petter's wrestling book includes strikes. And both Petter and Paschen have kicks, and open hand chops.


Return to “Unarmed Skills Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.