dagger defense questions

European historical unarmed fighting techniques & methods

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
scott adair
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 6:49 am
Location: Lubbock, TX

dagger defense questions

Postby scott adair » Mon Jan 01, 2007 8:13 am

I had to opportunity to do some unarmed against dagger work today with an old friend and a number of things came up in the process.

First there is a tremendous size difference. I am 5'7" and weigh 126#'s. My friend is 6'2" and weighs 210#'s.

I had been working on dagger techniques from Jay's book with Martin, my now relocated ARMA training partner, and we had been progressing fairly well and were able to make the techniques work at a about 75% speed. Martin is about my size.

Against the standard reverse grip stab the left hand interception and 'twist of the wrist disarm' illustrated on pages 62 and 63 of Jay's book worked every time at full speed.

'Single hand cover and stab' from page 78 and 'Armpit trap and disarm' (pg 79) worked fairly well at full speed.

We threw in a few left and right slashes to the face and against these I tried Fiore's Crown position. This is where things got really interesting. When my attacker threw what I consider to be a powerful slash (remember I'm small) I could usually stop it and counter with a hammer fist to the head. When he really put all of his weight and mass behind the blow his momentum would knock me off balance. I found that I was having to do a lot of passing and zoning to keep from getting clobbered. Especially when it was'nt just a single attack but he followed it with a charge to really press me and use his weight. Against the thrust from below we found the same thing. A simple step and thrust are one thing; a committed charge is a horse of a different color. Are we training reallisticly? Are we missing something? I want answers.

I don't want my knife training to be half @$$!



Scott Adair

Stewart Sackett
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:46 am
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Stewart Sackett » Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:06 am

I’m just getting started on dagger work myself & the guy I’m working with in my ARMA group is significantly bigger than I am. I find the best thing to do is to circle to the outside of his knife arm.

I don’t have the dagger book so I’ve been working mostly from the codex as well as drawing from a few modern sources. I quite like the S.T.A.B. (Survival Tactics Against Blades) curriculum which is knife defense based on Greco-Roman wrestling techniques. It has a decidedly western flare & is the essence of realistic training as everything is practiced against a genuinely resisting opponent. Having said that; there are significant differences between that curriculum, designed for unarmed defense against muggers & the like from close range, & historical knife fighting on battlefields or in duels where both combatants were likely to be armed & to see one another coming.

As for whether your training is realistic or not…I’d say that the more you can freeplay with daggers the more you’ll develop real skill. I’m a huge believer in freeplay as a primary training tool. No one should simply be attacking once & then waiting for a counter. Keep moving, maintain pressure, mix up your attacks & your counters. The other big thing is that in most real knife conflicts an attacker doesn’t stop after just one blow, so keep thrusting like your knife is the needle of a sowing machine stitching your opponent.

Hope that’s helpful. :)

mike willus
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 11:31 am
Location: pittsburgh, pa

Postby mike willus » Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:55 pm

I'd say that first of all, no matter what your level of hand to hand combat abilities are, when someone attacks you with a knife, you need to expect to get cut. You are at an extreme disadvantage because obviously, they have a knife and you are unarmed.

Secondly, you have to take into account the fact that you are facing an opponent who weighs close to boudle your weight, and, has an enormous height/reach advantage. Basically, the odds aren't working for you here.

As a pro-fighter, people always ask me questions about what to do in a particular situation as though there is one golden answer that always works. Unfortunatly, most of the situations people want answers for are the types that they are losing.

When someone pulls a knife and makes for you with all due intentions for harm...you are allready losing. Now, with training, i think it is possible to start changing the odds to give yourself the best chance of victory or survival.

I think that free-sparring with the rubber knife or non-edged blade is probably the way to go. However, you have to consider this...it takes an athletic person say 6 months to 1 year of training 3-5 days per week for at least an hour per day for them to use brazilian jiu-jitsu effectivly.

Now, using bjj effectivly after 6 months is one thing, because its viability is premised on what one could consider a fair (1 on 1) confrontation.

Once you involve a weapon all the odds fly out the window. Personaly, I think that for my tastes it would be time better spent practicing with a weapon you intend to carry (knife, baton, brass knuckles, pistol, etc). Best bet against a drawn blade is always a speeding bullet.

User avatar
Mike Cartier
Posts: 594
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 12:21 pm
Location: USA Florida

Postby Mike Cartier » Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:08 am

dagger/knife is one of the hardest weapoins to freeplay with bbut generally i think the more chaos you have involved in your sparring the better. A good powerful attack with commitment is always a hard thingto deal with but i would just look towards yopur form.
We work with the stuff Jay has been showing us and i its all very sound leverage wise, if you are having trouble handling the power of it just look to your form and there is probably somewhere in there you can adjust to gain the power you need in your defense.

Sometimes though when you are dealing with a huge disparity in strength you have to realise some things are just goingto be very very hard against certain people. Try to make it to one of Jays dagger seminars too.
Mike Cartier
Meyer Frei Fechter
www.freifechter.com

User avatar
scott adair
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 6:49 am
Location: Lubbock, TX

Postby scott adair » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:14 pm

Thanks guys,

I hope to catch Jay in Houston next fall. I may try to get together with the DFW guys also.


Scott

User avatar
JeffGentry
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Columbus Ohio

Postby JeffGentry » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:27 pm

With the diffrence in size you may want to grab the dagger hand and get out of the way sort of redirect his energy, it is nothing mystical or anything, otherwise he will run right over you every time, foot work is extremely important when fighting with a dagger, and you might want to attack his dagger hand before he can attack you.

Jeff
Semper Fidelis

Usque ad Finem

Grace, Focus, Fluidity

User avatar
Randall Pleasant
Posts: 872
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Flower Mound, Texas, USA

Postby Randall Pleasant » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:40 am

scott adair wrote:Thanks guys,

I hope to catch Jay in Houston next fall. I may try to get together with the DFW guys also.

Scott

The DFW study group is planning on doing some dagger work soon using Jay's book. Ernie and I will keep you informed so that hopefully you will be able to join us.
Ran Pleasant

User avatar
scott adair
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 6:49 am
Location: Lubbock, TX

Postby scott adair » Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:36 pm

Thanks Ran,

I will look forward to it!


Scott



The DFW study group is planning on doing some dagger work soon using Jay's book. Ernie and I will keep you informed so that hopefully you will be able to join us.[/quote]

Jay Vail
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 2:35 am

Re: dagger defense questions

Postby Jay Vail » Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:43 am

scott adair wrote:I had to opportunity to do some unarmed against dagger work today with an old friend and a number of things came up in the process.

First there is a tremendous size difference. I am 5'7" and weigh 126#'s. My friend is 6'2" and weighs 210#'s.

I had been working on dagger techniques from Jay's book with Martin, my now relocated ARMA training partner, and we had been progressing fairly well and were able to make the techniques work at a about 75% speed. Martin is about my size.

Against the standard reverse grip stab the left hand interception and 'twist of the wrist disarm' illustrated on pages 62 and 63 of Jay's book worked every time at full speed.

'Single hand cover and stab' from page 78 and 'Armpit trap and disarm' (pg 79) worked fairly well at full speed.

We threw in a few left and right slashes to the face and against these I tried Fiore's Crown position. This is where things got really interesting. When my attacker threw what I consider to be a powerful slash (remember I'm small) I could usually stop it and counter with a hammer fist to the head. When he really put all of his weight and mass behind the blow his momentum would knock me off balance. I found that I was having to do a lot of passing and zoning to keep from getting clobbered. Especially when it was'nt just a single attack but he followed it with a charge to really press me and use his weight. Against the thrust from below we found the same thing. A simple step and thrust are one thing; a committed charge is a horse of a different color. Are we training reallisticly? Are we missing something? I want answers.

I don't want my knife training to be half @$$!



Scott Adair


Sounds to me like you're doing okay. Start slow to get a feel for the technique and speed it up as you become more comfortable with it until your partner can execute realistic attacks in true time at full speed and you can defend at full speed. Once you feel comfortable when the attack and response are prescribed, have your partner attack you hard in any way he chooses and you defend in what works best for you. Be mindful, however, that if done hard many of the defenses can result in serious injury. So be careful.

In my experience, no one feels great with all the techniques in the box. Those techniques are a tool box. Learn them all. Find out which ones work best for you and master those. It is better to master a few that can be adapted to different situations than to learn all of them imperfectly.

Size makes a big difference, no matter what some people say. A small person can defeat a larger person, but the smaller person must be quicker and a better wrestler. Also, it is not wise to oppose the larger person by trying to manipulate the upper body -- unless you can apply both your arms to one of his (ie, the armpit lock works pretty well on a larger person,). Master Ott cautioned that if your opponent is stronger, you should fight in the after and attend to the knees, by which I take to mean that you evade his attack and counter, and focus on unbalancing him through the knees. But when facing a knife attack, you must first control the weapon arm. I tend to use the dagger taking methods when the guy is bigger than I am because they require virtually no strength.

As to sparring, you must be careful how you go about this. The techniques are intended to deal with the committed attack, and in most free play, the attacker does not make committed attacks. If you free play, the attacker must be very disciplined: he must make strong unexpected attacks, but they must be committed. Most training partners are unable to limit themselves in this way, and the play often degenerates into a form of touch fighting, with the attacker feinting, slashing, snap cutting and stabbing in jab-like motions. If he does this, you as the defender will be really hard pressed to defend yourself because unless the attack is committed, it is very hard to get hold of his arm. This was what Mike Cartier was alluding to. He has a lot of experience at this sort of thing.

As to defending against a slash, there is nothing in any of the manuals that I am aware of to date that describe how to do this. Evidently the Medieval dagger was used exclusively for stabbing. However, the old techniques can be adapted to address the slash. I tend to "parry strongly" (a term used by Meyer) in that situation. I take "parrying strongly" to mean a shuto-uke, or knifehand style block, and that strikes hard on the enemy's arm with the edge of the hand and then secures a grip. Once you have the grip, you can make any follow up that you think will work. (When I am on the inside, I usually follow with the back heel, or the backward-over-the-leg throw facing away. If I am on the outside, I usually use pressing arm.) The key to all the techniques is effective application of the cover.

Michael Douglas
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:12 am

Re: dagger defense questions

Postby Michael Douglas » Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:05 am

Jay Vail wrote:As to sparring, you must be careful how you go about this. The techniques are intended to deal with the committed attack, and in most free play, the attacker does not make committed attacks. If you free play, the attacker must be very disciplined: he must make strong unexpected attacks, but they must be committed. Most training partners are unable to limit themselves in this way, and the play often degenerates into a form of touch fighting, with the attacker feinting, slashing, snap cutting and stabbing in jab-like motions. If he does this, you as the defender will be really hard pressed to defend yourself because unless the attack is committed, it is very hard to get hold of his arm.

This is a great comment and one which is often overlooked. The techniques in the manuals seem to be applications against committed or even overcommitted attacks, but are real fight-enders.
To work to clearly achieve one of these techniques can sometimes get one or both practitioners into an unrealistic overcommitted or step-1-2-3 mindset and when a more cagey or random attack occurs the 'technique-based' defence usually fails.
To work mainly to survive a realistic quick multi-stabbing attack seems to me the first goal of training, with the nice techniques trained to be applied when the opportunity arises. Of course they need to be ingrained into our practice but not at the expense of survival.
What I have written sounds unclear, even to me, so apologies.
I just had to repeat Jay Vail's great comment which applies to a lot of martial training.

User avatar
Eric Dohner
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:00 am
Location: Upstate NY

Postby Eric Dohner » Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:45 am

I don't mean to intrude on a discussion on a subject about which I'm not very knowledgeable, but is it possible that in the time the fechtbuchs were written knife attacks happened differently from those that happen today?

For some reason, might knife/dagger attacks have been more likely to be committed or overcommitted, for some cultural or psychological reason (the same thing, really)? Growing up on a farm, I've done a lot of "cutting uncooked flesh with sharp knives," and know that it doesn't take much commitment or time to do a lot of damage.

(Edit: I meant to specify that I'm suggesting knife attacks may have happened differently for reasons other than the design of the knives themselves.)

User avatar
Brian Hunt
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 2:03 am
Location: Price, Utah
Contact:

Postby Brian Hunt » Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:00 am

Hi Eric,

ever tried to cut through multple layers of linen and wool? Europeans clothing was made of layers of these type of fabrics, plus sometimes they were stuffed like a gambeson. More layers to get through to find flesh. Plus on the streets of America today when someone attacks you with a knife it will generally be a strongly commited attack. To the best of my knowledge, the mindset of sparring seems to be different than the mindset of an attack.

all the best.

Brian Hunt
GFS
Tuus matar hamsterius est, et tuus pater buca sabucorum fundor!

http://www.paulushectormair.com
http://www.emerytelcom.net/users/blhunt/sales.htm

User avatar
JeffGentry
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Columbus Ohio

Postby JeffGentry » Sat Jan 13, 2007 1:18 pm

Brian Hunt wrote:Hi Eric,

ever tried to cut through multple layers of linen and wool? Europeans clothing was made of layers of these type of fabrics, plus sometimes they were stuffed like a gambeson. More layers to get through to find flesh. Plus on the streets of America today when someone attacks you with a knife it will generally be a strongly commited attack. To the best of my knowledge, the mindset of sparring seems to be different than the mindset of an attack.

all the best.

Brian Hunt
GFS


Hey Brian

This has been my expeience also people tend to attack with a mindset of not getting hit rather than a minset of I'm going to do you serious harm or kill you and so do not realy commit to any attack because they do not want to get hit themselve's so it result's in a game of tag.

Jeff
Semper Fidelis



Usque ad Finem



Grace, Focus, Fluidity

Jay Vail
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 2:35 am

Postby Jay Vail » Sat Jan 13, 2007 1:36 pm

Eric Dohner wrote:I don't mean to intrude on a discussion on a subject about which I'm not very knowledgeable, but is it possible that in the time the fechtbuchs were written knife attacks happened differently from those that happen today?

For some reason, might knife/dagger attacks have been more likely to be committed or overcommitted, for some cultural or psychological reason (the same thing, really)? Growing up on a farm, I've done a lot of "cutting uncooked flesh with sharp knives," and know that it doesn't take much commitment or time to do a lot of damage.

(Edit: I meant to specify that I'm suggesting knife attacks may have happened differently for reasons other than the design of the knives themselves.)



I think they happened in the day just as they do today. I was a police reporter and the London coroner's rolls from 1300-1375 read very much like police reports do today. I personally don't think much has changed.

User avatar
scott adair
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 6:49 am
Location: Lubbock, TX

Postby scott adair » Sun Jan 14, 2007 5:23 am

Jay,

I like your comments about the tool box. Not everything works for everyone. This is especially true for those of us of smaller stature and I sometimes lose sight of this fact.


Thanks to all who have contributed. I have much to think about.


Scott


Return to “Unarmed Skills Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.