Hi Jake,
You wrote: "The stuff in Meyer and in Ringeck is the same at the root, which is plenty to start with. Meyer is a bit different in application, and much clearer in practice. Check out a translation of Meyer's lognsword at
www.scheilhau.org. As for Messer stuff, you'll find a lot on that same site that will get you going if interested. I really am planning on doing a web article as soon as I've got a digicam to use; I've been trying out my theory in sparring and so forth with a lot of success, so I think I'm getting ready to share more of it."
Well, it seems to work pretty good on a heavy bag. And it gives lots more options than what I have been taught.
Jay wrote: "The twitch is the zucken, yes. Basically striking alternate long edge-short edge to alternate sides of the body/head and going up or down every one or two strikes. See Meyer's section on "Striking to the Four Openings" to see what I mean."
Gotcha. Tried it out last week and it works nicely (at least against that opponent who hangs in a bag from a pole and doesn't move <img src="/forum/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" /> ). I need to meet you at one of these gatherings and see what you have gleaned in person.
Jay wrote: "Clearly it is unreasonable to give anyone anything useful if they don't use it."
Maybe you could share that wisdom with the folks who do LE training. It isn't that the stuff isn't valid, but rather that there is minimal to no "on the clock" training to reinforce it. It is a bit like taking an ARMA training class for a week, learning a few basics and then being sent out to fight with swords. As opposed to training once a week for years, supplamented with study.
Jay wrote: " The attacks you were taught...I'm suprised that they needed "training" (in fact, they probably didn't). What I'm proposing will be easy for us HES guys, and quite different for the rest of the world, I would guess. I am trying to keep it down to a few simple and easy-to-remember fundamentals."
That is a good idea. The only other stick usage I have seen is Kali/Escrima/Silat type stuff, which while good in its own right, isn't something I want to study since I have enough on my plate with the longsword.
Jay wrote: "As for liability...I hate that entire issue. It's just wrong."
Right or wrong, that is the world we live in. <img src="/forum/images/icons/frown.gif" alt="" />
Jay wrote: " The "system" that I'm modifiying for ASP use is clearly one that targets the head in a life-or-death situation, but many of the techniques could be easily modified to do less damage to the head (due to the type of strike used, which isn't a full-arm wrath-blow until the "finishing move") or which could easily be targeted at the arms/wrists. Avoiding any injury to the other guy will be possible from the defensive manuevers planned (as they result in throws and locks that can become submission moves)."
The main thing is that if you are going to teach this as a modern street applicable thing is to also teach what is known as the force continuum in which you can escalate and de-escalate force as circumstances dictate. That seems different from what I have seen of the longswords material where there were apparently less liablity laws in Ringnecks day. <img src="/forum/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />
Jay wrote: "Finally, in all honesty, this is my first foray into modern self-defense and the like, so it's more of an experiment initially than anything else."
IMO at least some of the WMA stuff transfers over into the area, even if the polearms and such don't