Postby Jake_Norwood » Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:46 am
Okay, lots of stuff to reply to...
Re: Training at USMC
According to the most recent stuff I read, the USMC, at least, does require boxing. I wouldn't be suprised, however, if since late 2002 or 2003 Modern Combatives has been added as part of the POI.
At OCS, however, it's mandatory. Same with the up-and-coming Basic Officer Leadership Course (like PLDC for officers), which *all* commissioned officers will go to right after recieving their commission, prior to Officer Basic Course for their branch. Several of the guys in my Combatives Class were slated to be instructors there.
Re: Rear Naked Choke and Knives
While if done correctly it may be hard to get a knife, I've had lots of guys a lot stronger than me try to choke me out, and if they don't get the choke perfect (which I've only had done to me in a fight maybe 2 or 3 times out of dozens of attempts), then I have lots of mobility in my arms. Certainly enough to employ a dagger. Clearly the guys with the tasers at the Combatives Facility at Ft. Benning have seen the same thing.
That being said, in those 200+ recorded incidents, the rear-naked choke *does* appear rather frequently as probably the most successful technique. But again, that's against untrained opponents.
Re: Neck Breaks
I've never heard of a neck break being successfully used intentionally in real mano-e-mano combat. Anybody heard different? I know that "Prof. Tony Maynard" teaches "American Combat Jiu-Jitsu" which includes lots and lots of neck breaks. But seriously? I don't buy the neck break at all. Though I would be happily proven wrong *if* some kind of evidence can be proffered. For now, neck breaks and real fights seem like something that either happens when you drop a guy on his head, or it's an accident.
Re: Jeff's comment on time
Time is clearly an issue. Most Ringen techniques I can think of are quick and dirty. Get the job done fast, put the guy on the ground (staying standing), and get out of there. So yes, I think you might be on something there. However (!) there are a smaller number of holds and the like that *do* take a little more time, and these appear with much greater frequency than anything really resembling a choke.
Re: Meyer's "choke"
Give me the page reference for that and I'll check my translation.
Jake
Sen. Free Scholar
ARMA Deputy Director