Postby Gene Tausk » Thu Dec 18, 2003 10:02 pm
Respectfully disagree. As long as the person is trying to explain the technique, any relevant analysis is fine. Whether this analysis comes from Asian sources, European sources, or from Mars, as long as it makes sense and helps to understand what the figure is doing in the illustration, it is useful and therefore acceptable.
One of the goals of ARMA is to demonstrate the historically effective fighting techniques existed in Europe just as in Asia, so if it worked in Asia and was developed in Asia, it probobly had a counterpart in Europe. Therefore, using Asian analogies is useful IMO.
Besides, European terminology can be just as confusing. In reviewing the Goliath illustration again, I realized that Ted seemed to be setting Bill up for a throw common in sambo: looks like a zadnjaja podsechka to me. Ted is moving Bill into position through the use of a levaja dvizhenija and has released his hold on the kurtka to use the ruki for the poslednij brosok, imena zadnjaja podsechka.
Ponimajete, tovarichsh? Kak zhal...
<img src="/forum/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" />
--------------->>>>>>>>>>>gene
------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>gene tausk
Free-Scholar
Study Group Leader - Houston ARMA Southside
ARMA Forum Moderator