using other forms of Unarmed.

European historical unarmed fighting techniques & methods

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Max Lancaster
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:03 am
Location: Rancho Cucamonga/ Cali (909)

using other forms of Unarmed.

Postby Max Lancaster » Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:08 am

Does anyone else use any other form of Grappling when using WMA or do you stick to All WMA while using swordplay?
____________________

Respect for History and Heritage

Sincerity of Effort

Integrity of Scholarship

Appreciation of Martial Spirit

Cultivation of Self-Discipline

User avatar
Axel Pettersson
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Göteborg(Falun), Sweden
Contact:

Postby Axel Pettersson » Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:08 am

If you mean grappling moves with sword in hand or perhaps if a sword is dropped, I see no difference between the grappling moves done there and the rest of whatever wma repertoire I practice, they are all part of the same system, so naturally what ringen am schwert moves I know I use there, no kung fu.

That said, I sometimes use moves and locks I've learned in mma if the fight goes to the ground. It shouldn't do that often of cource, but if I practice without mats, its my experience its often safer to follow your opponent down on the ground rather than throwing him (like what happens halfway through this old video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwLeOJG39BY). MMA moves also come in handy since they are often for groundfighting and used for submission, not joint breaking, while Im still allowed to be agressive. Also, I simply do not know of any ringen or abrazare moves used on the ground specifically.

User avatar
Keith Culbertson
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Columbus OH

Postby Keith Culbertson » Wed Jun 06, 2007 2:11 pm

yes indeed, because 27+ years of various EMA and other systems were already ingrained before I met ARMA. That being said, most of the basic grappling maneuvers worldwide look pretty much the same since humans are pretty much the same and the best throws or holds are, well, the best ones for all people. In other words, if you are worried about mixing forms, please do not fuss overly much--my advice to those who want to be more purely WMA is to keep learning and drilling skills you want to exhibit, and eventually they will take precedence over most of the old ones you might have---but not necessarily in a pinch!

best
Keith, SA

User avatar
Jason Taylor
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Orange County, Southern California

Postby Jason Taylor » Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:01 pm

I hate to be the one to invoke the holy name of Bruce Lee :wink: but I think his quote works well in this situation. He said, when you first start, a punch is just a punch. When you've trained for a while, a punch is more than a punch. And when you're advanced enough, a punch is just a punch again. I'm paraphrasing, but I've found over time that this is pretty true. When you start out everything looks the same, then you learn to subdivide and resubdivide your techniques into more specific categories--this is an overarm hip throw, or a waist grab hip throw, and this is an armbar from the mount, and this is an armbar from the guard, and this is an arm control and leverage while here we have arm arm control with the pommel with another leverage, but it's different because it's using halfsword and the blade against the neck, etc. Those who've been doing this for a while just see everything as principles. I ask them, "what was that technique," and it takes them a second to quantify it--because it wasn't a technique for them, but a principle. If they trapped a hip with their own hip for a throw, or their knee, or thigh, or whatever, it's still a hip throw.

At this point, I'm just starting to see some glimmers of that same kind of "enlightenment" in my own practice of general martial practice, but it's still just beginning. But as far as mixing arts goes, I don't try to limit myself to specific "western" techniques, because I'd prefer to just react with the appropriate principle.

Jason
I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it.--The Day the Earth Stood Still

User avatar
philippewillaume
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:51 am
Location: UK, windsor
Contact:

Postby philippewillaume » Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:41 am

Keith Culbertson wrote:yes indeed, because 27+ years of various EMA and other systems were already ingrained before I met ARMA. That being said, most of the basic grappling maneuvers worldwide look pretty much the same since humans are pretty much the same and the best throws or holds are, well, the best ones for all people. In other words, if you are worried about mixing forms, please do not fuss overly much--my advice to those who want to be more purely WMA is to keep learning and drilling skills you want to exhibit, and eventually they will take precedence over most of the old ones you might have---but not necessarily in a pinch!

best


ahmen
One Ringeck to bring them all In the Land of Windsor where phlip phlop live.

User avatar
Jake_Norwood
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:46 am
Location: Clarksville, TN

Postby Jake_Norwood » Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:00 am

Yeah, same.

I tend to go straight into Army Combatives when on the ground, and Army Combatives groundfighting technique comes from BJJ.

Jake
Sen. Free Scholar
ARMA Deputy Director

Jay Vail
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 2:35 am

wrestling on the ground

Postby Jay Vail » Fri Jun 08, 2007 4:28 am

Although BJJ type ground methods are the fashion today, using them in WMA with the sword is probably not authentic or faithful to the methods of the masters. The manuals show few if any ground based techniques and most of those support the use of the dagger to finish the opponent on the ground. Talhoffer (1467) shows a couple of pinnings which then rely upon the dagger. The Gladiatoria shows seven pinning techniques for use with the dagger.

Von Danzig has this to say about wrestling and swordplay:

Now you should know that, for the most part, all fight in single combat in harness comes in the end to dagger fighting and to wrestling. Therefore note, when you close with an opponent, then attend to nothing else but the wrestling and let your dagger stay in its scabbard, because you cannot hurt him through the harness as long as he is standing before you and hinders your hand. When you secure him with the wrestling or have thrown him and have overcome him, then work with the dagger to the openings that you will find explained hereafter, and that have already been explained.


Paulus Kal, "In Service of the Duke," Tobler trans. (Chivalry Bookshelf 2007), p. 212.

So while BJJ style grappling is fun and may be profitable for the unarmed man, the dynamic changes dramatically when a dagger comes into play. And since every man of the age carried a dagger, it seems fairly clear to me that ground wrestling, to the extent there was any, was brief and ended when the dagger was drawn.

Try this yourself. Arm yourselves with daggers and then try ground grappling and see how long that lasts before somebody gets "stabbed."

User avatar
Jake_Norwood
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:46 am
Location: Clarksville, TN

Postby Jake_Norwood » Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:24 am

Absolutely. In the US Army combatives school, when they start handing out stun guns as dagger simulators, the dynamic changes very dramatically.

Jake
Sen. Free Scholar

ARMA Deputy Director

Jay Vail
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 2:35 am

Postby Jay Vail » Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:32 pm

Jake_Norwood wrote:Absolutely. In the US Army combatives school, when they start handing out stun guns as dagger simulators, the dynamic changes very dramatically.

Jake


Doesn't it, eh :D :D And it's all such fun.

User avatar
Jason Taylor
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Orange County, Southern California

Re: wrestling on the ground

Postby Jason Taylor » Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:27 am

Jay Vail wrote:Although BJJ type ground methods are the fashion today, using them in WMA with the sword is probably not authentic or faithful to the methods of the masters. The manuals show few if any ground based techniques and most of those support the use of the dagger to finish the opponent on the ground. Talhoffer (1467) shows a couple of pinnings which then rely upon the dagger. The Gladiatoria shows seven pinning techniques for use with the dagger.

Von Danzig has this to say about wrestling and swordplay:

Now you should know that, for the most part, all fight in single combat in harness comes in the end to dagger fighting and to wrestling. Therefore note, when you close with an opponent, then attend to nothing else but the wrestling and let your dagger stay in its scabbard, because you cannot hurt him through the harness as long as he is standing before you and hinders your hand. When you secure him with the wrestling or have thrown him and have overcome him, then work with the dagger to the openings that you will find explained hereafter, and that have already been explained.


Paulus Kal, "In Service of the Duke," Tobler trans. (Chivalry Bookshelf 2007), p. 212.

So while BJJ style grappling is fun and may be profitable for the unarmed man, the dynamic changes dramatically when a dagger comes into play. And since every man of the age carried a dagger, it seems fairly clear to me that ground wrestling, to the extent there was any, was brief and ended when the dagger was drawn.

Try this yourself. Arm yourselves with daggers and then try ground grappling and see how long that lasts before somebody gets "stabbed."


I've done this, and I timed it. .078 seconds. :) Just kidding (though it's not much of an exaggeration).

When I've had beginner students below me in my EMA school who think that BJJ is the end-all be-all, and who want to take me down and "submit " me in sparring, I have been known to strap a rubber knife in a cardboard sheath to my leg with strapping tape, and then let them do it. The result was not only comedic for my watching instructor, but enlightening for my student, who had lost a kidney and a chunk of his intestines before he even knew what was happening.

And before that, I'd never really fought much on the ground with a knife. No skill is required really to inflict serious, serious damage in that situation.

Jason
I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it.--The Day the Earth Stood Still

User avatar
JeffGentry
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Columbus Ohio

Re: wrestling on the ground

Postby JeffGentry » Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:03 am

Jay Vail wrote:Although BJJ type ground methods are the fashion today, using them in WMA with the sword is probably not authentic or faithful to the methods of the masters. The manuals show few if any ground based techniques and most of those support the use of the dagger to finish the opponent on the ground. Talhoffer (1467) shows a couple of pinnings which then rely upon the dagger. The Gladiatoria shows seven pinning techniques for use with the dagger.

Von Danzig has this to say about wrestling and swordplay:

Now you should know that, for the most part, all fight in single combat in harness comes in the end to dagger fighting and to wrestling. Therefore note, when you close with an opponent, then attend to nothing else but the wrestling and let your dagger stay in its scabbard, because you cannot hurt him through the harness as long as he is standing before you and hinders your hand. When you secure him with the wrestling or have thrown him and have overcome him, then work with the dagger to the openings that you will find explained hereafter, and that have already been explained.


Paulus Kal, "In Service of the Duke," Tobler trans. (Chivalry Bookshelf 2007), p. 212.

So while BJJ style grappling is fun and may be profitable for the unarmed man, the dynamic changes dramatically when a dagger comes into play. And since every man of the age carried a dagger, it seems fairly clear to me that ground wrestling, to the extent there was any, was brief and ended when the dagger was drawn.

Try this yourself. Arm yourselves with daggers and then try ground grappling and see how long that lasts before somebody gets "stabbed."



Hey gent's

Last night at practice Myself and one of our guy's(Jaron Bernstein) were doing our sword thing as we usualy do and he went to take me down with a body lock and I stuffed it so it didn't happen and the first thing he did as usualwas drop his sword and try again and so I called a halt because i still had my sword.

Now the reason I tell this story, I have told our guy's on numerous occasion's to not be so hasty dropping there weapon, becasue at the point he dropped his weapon I wanted to take him down, I stopped the bout and then demonstrated how difficult it would be to even defend himself with a weapon when I was sitting on his chest.

I had him lay on his back and gave him his sword, I then mounted him ( I had no weapon) I then told him to defend himself he tried valiantly until I pinned his arm and hit him in the face (he was wearing a Brian Hunt helmet) he then dropped the sword and tried to free his hand's to keep me from hitting him, if he had a dagger in a sheath I bet me hitting him repeatedly would stop him from accessing it and if I am choking, hitting, and twisting an arm I do not see him accessing a knife I see him trying to stop me from choking, hitting, and twisting his arm.

We need to keep in mind that the guy in a dominant position is in just that a Dominant position and if he can strike, choke and break bone's we need to deal with all that before we can access any weapon, dealing with the attack can be anything up to and including escaping to regain distance ie escape and stand up, gaining the dominant position or what ever.

Introducing a weapon does change the dynamic, when the weapon is in a pocket, snapped into a sheath or whatever, you need to be in a dominant position in order to access it, and if your not you need to get there before deploying a weapon or it is may just be stripped from you and used on you.

Just my opinion.

Jeff
Semper Fidelis

Usque ad Finem

Grace, Focus, Fluidity

User avatar
Max Lancaster
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:03 am
Location: Rancho Cucamonga/ Cali (909)

Postby Max Lancaster » Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:23 am

Well..If you stab someone with a knife you better have a good story to tell the cops when you get arrested for stabbing a unarmed man.
____________________



Respect for History and Heritage



Sincerity of Effort



Integrity of Scholarship



Appreciation of Martial Spirit



Cultivation of Self-Discipline

User avatar
JeffGentry
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Columbus Ohio

Postby JeffGentry » Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:44 pm

Max Lancaster wrote:Well..If you stab someone with a knife you better have a good story to tell the cops when you get arrested for stabbing a unarmed man.


Max

That is another good point that escaped me.

Jeff
Semper Fidelis



Usque ad Finem



Grace, Focus, Fluidity

User avatar
Max Lancaster
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:03 am
Location: Rancho Cucamonga/ Cali (909)

Postby Max Lancaster » Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:26 pm

Two things REALLY will mess you up when pulling a knife and using it on a person.
1) Not being able to come up with truths that make you look good faster than they can come up with lies that make you look bad.
2) Not knowing when to stop.

Point one. "Articulatable Facts" are your FRIEND! If you cannot tell people
what happened, what you did to avoid/prevent, what they did to make it
happen, what they did that made it necessary for what you did.... then you
are well and truly fragged. This, no matter how legit the need for the level of force was. One of the things that a DA can do if you can't line out the details is make the most obvious case of SD look like you were
over-reacting. No poop, I've seen it. It was clear cut SD and the defendant
basically ended up answering the question of "why did you kill him" with
what amounted to "because he looked at me mean..."

I highly recommend saving up your pennies and taking Massad Ayoob's Judicious Use of Lethal Force class, it is a form of insurance that will save your butt. (Also Mas tells you little points like "Find an attorney who knows how to protect an innocent person, because you defend and innocent person differently than you do a guilty one. If you are innocent and the attorney attempts to defend you like he would a guilty person he's trying to get off, he'll get you convicted."

If you can tell the cops these truths (Like: I saw them and crossed the
street to avoid them and they crossed over to intercept me) the cops can ask the other guys to explain their actions and them lying will really influence how the report is written up. This has a strong influence on whether or not you are prosecuted.

Point two. I have a friend who was a Assist DA in Montana. They were
prosecuting a guy who felt he was being persecuted because the other guy had attacked him first. Alain, explained to him "Look I understand that he
attacked you first. You were defending yourself when you knocked him down... that's not the reason you're being charged. You're being charged because once he was down, you started kicking him. When that happened you weren't defending yourself anymore, you were attacking a helpless man."

The guy proceeded to kick a downed man because "he might get up and attack again" In an adrenalized, fear state this is a seemingly "logical" decision to make. The problem is that it now makes you the aggressor. You are no longer reacting to what IS happening, you are reacting to what might happen -- or what you think is still happening. That last part is extremely important. In a fear state you won't see things like which direction he is facing, all you will see is that the guy is still standing in front of you and didn't "go away" when you slashed him. This is where most people get in trouble with knives, they cut the guy and then keep on cutting. A knife isn't a rifle bullet, there is no RAS shock to make the guy fall down (the nervous system shuts down for a split second and he collapses). You slash someone he sn't going to immediately fall down. The problem with this is our lizard brain still sees him as a threat... even if he is Turning away in order to run


The problem with most knife training these days is that they teach you to
lay down 27 slashes on the guy... "because the first one may not work." What What
these stupid guys don't realize is that the slash DID work! The dude IS
cut! Sometimes he doesn't know it yet. Other times he does and he is trying
to break off the attack. But the freaked out lizard brain of the knifer
thinks "HE'S STILL ATTACKING" and proceeds to go cuisinart on the dude. The
problem with this approach is that in forensic terms what they are know
doing is inflicting "defensive wounds." In short, it's hard to claim it is
self-defense when the dude has most of the slashes on his back because he
was turning away or on the bottom of his forearms because he was trying to
stop being cut. This kind of stuff really torpedoes your "I was defending
myself with a knife" plea.

This is why I am such a big advocate of "cut and run." Don't stand there
and try to fight... instead cut your way out of the attack and run fiercely.
Not only does it give him time to realize that things ain't hunky dory no
more, but it prevents you from going weedwacker of death on someone because you thought he was attacking long after he wasn't anymore.

I practice hardcore Escrima/Kali/Arnis and I trust and belive in it's form of Knife and Weapon fighting and I am a Ex military guy. I carry a knife and you got to know when or where is the proper time to pull it and use it on someone.

In other words. If you are gonna get jumped...You have to run screaming your head off though a crowd of ppl and yelling help. Now the witnesses know that you needed help and 90% of the population is not going to help you BUT atleast you have witnesses that saw you screaming for help. Now if you get surrounded or attacked you had to pull your knife and slash and run. If the cops arrest you this is your defence.

Cop- Hello , weak and controlled citizen. Why in the world would you think you had the right to defend yourself.

Citizen- I was being attacked by several People and I ran for my life and they gave chase, I ran screaming for help and nobody helped me or called the police and they surrounded me. I pulled a knife and cut one and then ran for my life.

"REMEMBER" everything has to be about YOUR LIFE.

on another note. If you are ever attacked by 1 or more people and you fall on the ground and you pull a knife. Remember to cut the person on the foot. for 2 good reasons.

1) it shows that you were prone on the ground "helpless" and he carried on his attack on you and you pulled your knife in fear of your LIFE and cut his foot or leg to stop him from kicking you to DEATH and you ran

2) Kicken a person while they are down can be consided attempted murder.

And always remember. If you pull a knife and cut someone DON'T go Freddy krugar on them. CUT and run! If they give chase and you can't out run them they will figure out in a few seconds that they had been slashed and you are ARMED and maybe it's a good idea to not chase. It also shows the cops that you showed RESTRAINT (Spelling?)

By the way. BJJ is great but being in that Dominant position while someone is lying on their back can fall into that. Why did you keep attacking him if he was down?
Why did you apply a Choke that the DA can turn around on you and say you were trying to CHOKE = KILL him.

Remember, The law does not want you to protect yourself. They really want you to lay there and get beat to death and wait for them to show up 5 mins later. The problem with the laws out look is. It only takes 1 to 2 mins for someone to beat you to death with a hammer. LOL!

But atleast you get to sit in front of 12 hardworking Americans and hopefully if your story pans out there will feel on the level with you

In this article, I am not sure if there is cursing. So please forgive it if there is.


Here is a article that I think everyone should read.

Virtue of the Sword


by James Williams


Training in various, seemingly antiquated, military arts is becoming increasing common in our 21st century society. Why pursue these arts that require so much effort, discipline, and often pain? Why do we seek to test ourselves in struggle and training for combat? What brought us to these arts, and what do we hope to get out of this training?


I am frequently asked why I practice and teach classical warrior skills and adhere to a philosophy that appears outdated to many. The sword has defined the warrior for thousands of years. It has defined the power, ethics, duty and self-defense of a class of people who have shaped the face of civilization on this planet. The skill, exercise, mental development, and sheer pleasure of using a sword is unique. Hand-to-hand combat with edged weapons is the most demanding form of human physical combat. It not only requires the most skill, both physical and mental, it develops in the adept abilities that separate him from others and elevates intuition, reflexes, and technique to the highest degree. For the warrior, the sword represents his duty, his honor and his responsibility.


This is, for the most part, no longer a society that values the warrior and his virtues. Ours is a society that has forgotten the sacrifices and struggles of so many who came before them, the fruit of whose effort and sacrifice we daily enjoy; it is a society that will ask of its military, but not honor or care for its men. It is a society where virtue is often looked at askance, where character is not required of those who would seek to lead us. A society that enjoys enormous plenty yet denies its military the necessary munitions to train to protect this very wealth. Why do a significant number of its citizens seek training and embrace virtues that seem passe? Perhaps not all have forgotten that less than 60 years ago the entire world was involved in a great struggle to determine if a free nation could exist. Most of us know someone who participated in that struggle and through whose efforts we have the gift of choice and plenty which seems to be taken so lightly by so many.


"Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival". Winston Churchill

"For without victory there is no survival." These words define the role of the male in history, his service to life. The harsh reality of freedom in a nation, a fact that is overlooked or denied by many, is that our freedom is the direct result of our strength. It was by struggle and conflict that we became free and have kept ourselves that way. We have received from our ancestors, at great cost, a precious gift that must be cherished and nurtured if we are going to pass it on to our children. It must be protected, fought for if necessary, and we must not let this gift be taken from us by those whose rhetoric and actions are nonsense. These are people who seek things for themselves at the expense of the whole.


"Freedom means responsibility and that is why most men shun it."
George Bernard Shaw


Everywhere that you look in history this is the case. When our strength goes we will no longer be free. We will be dictated to and ruled by those stronger than ourselves. Does this mean that it is necessary to cultivate aggression and belligerence? Absolutely not! It does, however, mean that we need to cultivate in ourselves those virtues that guide a free people: courage, honor, truthfulness, responsibility, perseverance, charity, strength tempered with compassion, discrimination tempered with tolerance.


Virtue as a prerequisite for freedom


It is the very cultivation of virtue that ensures the will and ability to be a free people. A society degenerates with the loss of virtue and the high regard in which it is held. This has been the lesson of history. It is always surprising to me that the events and lessons learned from the past are so quickly forgotten. It is as if we deliberately purge them from our memory. Human history is fraught with the folly of this peculiar mechanism, yet we continue it at our peril.

"If you lose the past," the 9th century Chinese poet Meng Jiao says, "The will easily crumbles."
This blurring and removing of the past is a valuable tool of social architecture as is evidenced in modern China, one of many such examples in the 20th century. The misinformation and dis-information that make up so much of our current social and political agenda separates us from our past. This deliberate perversion of truth should be anathema to those who value virtue. It is anathema because those who use it seek to change the order of society with falsehoods. As warriors we do not have to go far back into history to find instances where the courage and sacrifice of a few have so benefited the whole.


"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few." These words were spoken by Prime Minister Winston Churchill in reference to the debt owed by the British people to the RAF during the Battle of Britain.


The reason we are called to cultivate classical warrior skills and virtues is out of a feeling of duty to the whole of society. We prepare ourselves for those times when we may be called upon to protect and defend. Any other reason is selfish and ultimately self-destructive. Being tough and a good fighter is not in and of itself noble. For me, training in kenjutsu and related military arts prepares me to be a good citizen. It enables me to be of assistance when it is necessary to protect and defend. It teaches me self-discipline that I may moderate my behavior. I learn perseverance and courage in the face of difficulty so that I am not easily deterred. All of this adds up to the courage to live life not just for oneself but also for others. For me, teaching is giving to others what has been given to me. Like having children, it is the completion of the cycle. What a benefit it will be to society as a whole if those of us who aspire to a noble nature strive to imbue society with care, commitment, and positive action! Look out for and protect those in need! Support each other when faced with those of evil nature who would prey on the weak and defenseless!


The noblest aspects of human consciousness, our virtues, become passe ever more quickly as we find substitutes for living a life connected with the reality of our existence. The less we grow, hunt, and gather our food, the less directly involved we are in protecting ourselves and our families and nation, the more readily we lose our virtue. The less we know of and value our past, The less we honor those who, with their courage and sacrifice, have bequeathed to us our current state of freedom and plenty, the less likely we are to pass this enviable state on to those who follow us. Are we so self-absorbed that our decisions are made on the basis of our personal wants and our ease? Are we as a people so easily bought that we will sell our freedom and that of our children for comfort?


The Warrior as protector of society


The warrior protects and defends because he realizes the value of others. He knows that they are essential to society and, in his gift of service, recognizes and values theirs. This responsibility translates to children as well. When in a public bathroom, keep an eye on any children that may be in there. Even wait an extra moment or two to make sure that they are safely out of the restroom before you leave. It is an unfortunate fact that public restrooms are frequented by pedophiles and potential kidnappers. Being a father myself I feel a serious responsibility to all children and hope that other males will help look after mine when I am not present. I cannot count the number of times that I have seen nervous mothers waiting outside of a public bathroom for a young son. Make a point, even to telling the mother, that you will keep an eye on the safety of her child in an area in which she cannot go.


There are other ways in which we can be of daily use. For instance, take the extra moment in dark parking lots at night to make sure that a woman gets into her car safely before leaving yourself. Daily involvement in acts such as these are as much a part of training as time spent in the dojo, and indeed should be the reason for that time spent training.


The role and ability to protect and defend does not give the warrior-protector the right to misuse this strength and knowledge. You are not superior to nor do you have the right to take advantage of others by means of this strength and ability. If you breach this trust and your sacred responsibility then you are not a warrior-protector. Over the centuries this power has been misused all too often in societies to dominate and control others. This is the dark side of power and has no place in the life of the warrior seeking to live a life of virtue.


When faced with a woman or child in a situation in which they are vulnerable, there are two types of men: those who would offer succor and aid, and those who would prey upon them. And in modern society, there is another loathsome breed who would totally ignore their plight!
I remember the first time my friends and I read about an incident that happened in New York City where a woman was attacked and eventually killed over an extended period of time. This was in the early 1960's, and I think the duration of the attack was 15 to 20 minutes. Neighbors in the area could hear her calls for help, however, no one had the courage to go to her aid. My friends and I were incredulous that something like this could take place in America. How could anyone, most especially men, hear a woman being murdered and not involve themselves in her defense. Many current laws actually place the person who would come to another's aid in legal jeopardy. Is this a sign of social and psychological health in a society?


In 1977 I was teaching and competing in boxing and kick boxing and teaching women and seniors self-defense through the Institute for Better Health in Santa Rosa, California. An incident took place in Rancho Cordova, California that had a big impact on me both as a man and a martial artist. This incident was a home invasion rape and murder. A husband and wife were both home when they heard a noise in the master bedroom. The man went to investigate and was confronted by an intruder with a knife who had entered through the bedroom window. Being threatened with the knife the husband capitulated and allowed himself to be led into the front room and tied to a chair. The criminal then raped the wife in front of the husband who could do nothing but watch. After finishing with the rape, the criminal got a hammer from the garage and proceeded to beat the husband to death in front of the wife. After he had brutally killed the husband he turned the hammer on the wife leaving her for dead. The wife, who was not dead, managed to crawl out of the house where neighbors heard her mewling and came to her aid. She suffered physical and emotional scars that marred her for life.


I often wonder what would go through a man's mind when he fails through fear and lack of training to fulfill his responsibility in such circumstances. We all have fear. That is why it is necessary to prepare, to train, to understand the part that we play in the dance of life. How much more honorable, more noble, to have engaged the assailant, even if there was slim chance for personal victory, and in doing so give your wife the opportunity to escape! Preparation for such an eventuality could have provided a better outcome for both.


In 1984, a good friend of mine, Toby Threadgill, who now teaches samurai arts in Texas, was faced with a more difficult situation. He was awakened from sleep by two men who had followed his wife home from her nursing job late one night with the intention of raping her. One held a gun to his head while the other went looking for his wife. Realizing their intent, and at the risk of his life, my friend managed to disarm the gunman by driving him through a sliding-glass door. Then confronted by the knife wielding second man he managed, although sustaining a serious wound, to disarm and incapacitate him. Although a likeable and easy going person, Toby had prepared himself mentally and physically so that when faced with a dangerous situation he had both the tools and the courage to use them. How much better the outcome!


Society becomes vulnerable to every kind of threat when men no longer feel the need to prepare themselves by acquiring skills to protect and defend society, especially women and children. When men no longer take responsibility for being male and when a sense of duty is replaced by self-concern and self-indulgence, society looses its greatest strength- the mutual caring and commitment of its citizens for each other.


Courtesy: a show of respect


Courtesy is an essential element for the warrior. It should be a defining act that can be practiced daily.


"To be a samurai is to be polite at all times."
Hojo Nagauji


Chivalry frames an ideal of heroic character. It combines invincible strength and valor, justice, modesty, loyalty to superiors, courtesy to equals, compassion for the weak, and devotion to God; it is an ideal which, even if never achieved in real life, has been widely acknowledged as the highest model for emulation.


These acts of courtesy are first and foremost for yourself. The respect and care that you have for yourself can then extend to other human beings. This altruistic value and most virtues are being sacrificed to the right of the individual to every form of indulgence. And, in that very process, the individual is then pressured to conform to the mores of the current political thinking of the State.
Showing courtesy is indicative of inner strength and security as a male. Courtesy is the lubricant of a culture, and should be the hallmark of the warrior. No situation is made worse by the exercise of courtesy and many situations are made the better for it. I enjoy showing courtesy towards women in the many ways that are available. When I hold a door open for a woman or help her carry an object, it is not that I think that she is not capable of doing it for herself. I do it in recognition of her intrinsic value to society and to me. Men are respected and shown courtesy as they earn the right. This process of earning respect is an important part of its value. The word loses its meaning and value in an atmosphere where many think that respect should be given just because a person exists regardless of his actions or value to the society.


An attitude of self-concern has grown more prevalent as our lives have become easier. Risking oneself for others or for a principle is less and less common. We have become less committed to each other and have created a world in which we seemingly do not need each other to survive. Virtues such as courage, honor, and integrity even carry a stigma in some circles. The very foundations of character are under attack by those who do not understand that there is nothing noble in being human without these virtues


It is not the role of everyone to be a warrior, however, those of us who respond to this calling should train and study to be the best that we are able. The are many guides and heroes that we can look to as warriors, and not all are male. One of mine, Mother Teresa, has just recently died. I find great inspiration in her life. Here is someone who found her life purpose and lived it steadfastly and, from my standpoint, even gloriously by giving to those too wretched for others to even consider. The courage, love and selfless sense of service that she displayed should serve to inspire us all. If I can live my life while giving just one fraction of what she gave to others it will be an accomplishment.
Teaching then becomes

a means whereby we can pass on to others the knowledge and wisdom acquired from those who have preceded us. It is not about self-aggrandizement or superiority. It is not about titles and rank, or organizations or profit. Most of the time I feel that I am learning more from my students than they are learning from me. The teacher becomes the student and the student the teacher. Neither can exist without the other.


As human beings we are all different. Having different skills, strengths, or abilities does not mean that an individual does not have abilities that benefit himself and society. I shun the sameness that is a part of much of modern social theory. It is abhorrent and detracts from what makes us human. I am a large, strong male, over six feet tall and weighing over 200 pounds who has spent the majority of his adult life involved in military and combative activities, studies and training. My wife is a foot shorter and over 100 pounds lighter. We are physically suited for different tasks in life. I respect and cherish her strength and femininity. And the more so because I have been at her side, in what limited capacity a man may provide, while she bore our two children with only her courage and my meager assistance and encouragement to sustain her.


"When the choice is between cowardice and violence, I would strongly recommend violence."
Mohandus Ghandi


We are no longer training our children, especially our young men, to deal with pain, defeat, and discomfort with a brave heart and stoic spirit. We seem to think that by removing consequences for their actions we are actually benefiting them. They do not build true character based on trial and effort.


When there is no pain, no death, no challenge, no struggle, no adversity, and no disappointment we will lose the best part of being human. When we structure a life and society devoid of every human challenge there will be no courage, no perseverance, no honor, no compassion, no caring, and no commitment. We will have lost the best parts of who we are because we will have let our fear steal them from us. We will no longer need each other and this will be the greatest tragedy.
Being a warrior means being committed to making the ultimate sacrifice and also committing the ultimate act. The gentleman warrior must take responsibility for his actions and use his power for the good of society and his fellow human beings. As the old samurai saying goes, "To kill when it is right to kill and to die when it is right to die!" In a similar vein, the code of the Sumerian warrior-king stated that he was to act as the shepherd of his people. The role of the warrior as a stabilizing influence in civilized society and protector of the weak is as old as civilization itself.

Sparta vs. Greece


Many, women more often than men, feel that being a warrior means being an oppressor. History, however, does not necessarily bear out this idea. In Sparta, the strongest warrior culture that the Greeks produced, the woman had the most freedom of any Grecian woman of the time. The women, received much the same education as the young men, and shared a life with their men far closer than did the women of Athens.


In sexual matters, the Spartans, true to their nature, seem to have had the highest rate of monogamy in all of Greece. They held their woman in high esteem and Spartan women had greater equality than their Grecian sisters who were treated according to the more Oriental standards towards women of the rest of Greece.


The Spartans were also renowned for their virtue and being the most pious of all Greeks. There is a story told by Plutarch about the Spartans at one of the Olympiads. In the crowded throng at the Olympic games, an old man was looking in vain for a seat from which to watch the events. His stumbling attempts to find one were noticed by many Greeks from other states, who mocked him for his age and difficulty in finding a seat. When, however, he came to the section where the Spartans were seated, every man among them rose to his feet and offered him their seats. Somewhat abashed, but nevertheless admiringly, the other Greeks applauded them for their behavior. "Ah," the old man is reported to have said with a sigh, "I see what it is. All Greeks know what is right, but only the Spartans do it.'"


Woman also fared well in other warrior societies. Viking woman owned their own property and could divorce their husbands if they were mistreated. The Celts of Britannia often had women as rulers and many tribes were matriarchal. It is false to think that because men are warriors that it follows that they look down on women.


Peace and pacifism are not congruent with each other. Albert Einstein realized the 1930's that his pacifistic approach to Nazi Germany would not work.
"He experienced that the ultimate ethical values, on which all human existence is based, must, as a last resort, be defended even by force and with the sacrifice of human lives..."
Max Born on Albert Einstein's realizations prior to the Second World War.


How can we forget the courage and sacrifice of those that have gone before us in providing us with freedom and plenty. How can we not take up the torch to provide this same freedom to those who come after. We should honor all who have given of themselves with the ultimate sacrifice that provides us with what we not enjoy, even if this sacrifice was long ago and far away.


"Go tell the Spartans, stranger passing by, that here, according to her laws we lie."
Epitaph written by the poet Simonides at the ancient monument celebrating Spartan courage and sacrifice at Thermopylae that was instrumental in holding off the Persians under Xerxes and preserving the concept of democracy for the world to come.


Virtue must be taught and practiced; it must be nurtured and passed to each generation. Freedom must be taught and practiced as well. If not, it easily perishes. Virtue and freedom go hand in hand. Not to cherish the one is not to cherish the other. A society that looses the warriors' virtues is the poorer for it and will soon be a society whose freedoms are lost. The male has a genetic prime directive-a service to life-to protect and defend. In this service he is historically more expendable than the female and the children. Every man is responsible for defending every woman and every child When the male no longer assumes this role, when he no longer has the courage or moral responsibility, society will cease to value honor and virtue. Neither laws nor government can replace this personal caring and commitment. In the absence of the warrior-protector, the only way that a government can protect a society is to remove the freedom of its people. And in such a society, the sons and daughters of lions become sheep.
____________________



Respect for History and Heritage



Sincerity of Effort



Integrity of Scholarship



Appreciation of Martial Spirit



Cultivation of Self-Discipline

User avatar
Gene Tausk
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 7:37 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Postby Gene Tausk » Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:44 pm

Max Lancaster wrote:Two things REALLY will mess you up when pulling a knife and using it on a person.
1) Not being able to come up with truths that make you look good faster than they can come up with lies that make you look bad.
2) Not knowing when to stop.

Point one. "Articulatable Facts" are your FRIEND! If you cannot tell people
what happened, what you did to avoid/prevent, what they did to make it
happen, what they did that made it necessary for what you did.... then you
are well and truly fragged. This, no matter how legit the need for the level of force was. One of the things that a DA can do if you can't line out the details is make the most obvious case of SD look like you were
over-reacting. No poop, I've seen it. It was clear cut SD and the defendant
basically ended up answering the question of "why did you kill him" with
what amounted to "because he looked at me mean..."

I highly recommend saving up your pennies and taking Massad Ayoob's Judicious Use of Lethal Force class, it is a form of insurance that will save your butt. (Also Mas tells you little points like "Find an attorney who knows how to protect an innocent person, because you defend and innocent person differently than you do a guilty one. If you are innocent and the attorney attempts to defend you like he would a guilty person he's trying to get off, he'll get you convicted."

If you can tell the cops these truths (Like: I saw them and crossed the
street to avoid them and they crossed over to intercept me) the cops can ask the other guys to explain their actions and them lying will really influence how the report is written up. This has a strong influence on whether or not you are prosecuted.

Point two. I have a friend who was a Assist DA in Montana. They were
prosecuting a guy who felt he was being persecuted because the other guy had attacked him first. Alain, explained to him "Look I understand that he
attacked you first. You were defending yourself when you knocked him down... that's not the reason you're being charged. You're being charged because once he was down, you started kicking him. When that happened you weren't defending yourself anymore, you were attacking a helpless man."

The guy proceeded to kick a downed man because "he might get up and attack again" In an adrenalized, fear state this is a seemingly "logical" decision to make. The problem is that it now makes you the aggressor. You are no longer reacting to what IS happening, you are reacting to what might happen -- or what you think is still happening. That last part is extremely important. In a fear state you won't see things like which direction he is facing, all you will see is that the guy is still standing in front of you and didn't "go away" when you slashed him. This is where most people get in trouble with knives, they cut the guy and then keep on cutting. A knife isn't a rifle bullet, there is no RAS shock to make the guy fall down (the nervous system shuts down for a split second and he collapses). You slash someone he sn't going to immediately fall down. The problem with this is our lizard brain still sees him as a threat... even if he is Turning away in order to run


The problem with most knife training these days is that they teach you to
lay down 27 slashes on the guy... "because the first one may not work." What What
these stupid guys don't realize is that the slash DID work! The dude IS
cut! Sometimes he doesn't know it yet. Other times he does and he is trying
to break off the attack. But the freaked out lizard brain of the knifer
thinks "HE'S STILL ATTACKING" and proceeds to go cuisinart on the dude. The
problem with this approach is that in forensic terms what they are know
doing is inflicting "defensive wounds." In short, it's hard to claim it is
self-defense when the dude has most of the slashes on his back because he
was turning away or on the bottom of his forearms because he was trying to
stop being cut. This kind of stuff really torpedoes your "I was defending
myself with a knife" plea.

This is why I am such a big advocate of "cut and run." Don't stand there
and try to fight... instead cut your way out of the attack and run fiercely.
Not only does it give him time to realize that things ain't hunky dory no
more, but it prevents you from going weedwacker of death on someone because you thought he was attacking long after he wasn't anymore.

I practice hardcore Escrima/Kali/Arnis and I trust and belive in it's form of Knife and Weapon fighting and I am a Ex military guy. I carry a knife and you got to know when or where is the proper time to pull it and use it on someone.

In other words. If you are gonna get jumped...You have to run screaming your head off though a crowd of ppl and yelling help. Now the witnesses know that you needed help and 90% of the population is not going to help you BUT atleast you have witnesses that saw you screaming for help. Now if you get surrounded or attacked you had to pull your knife and slash and run. If the cops arrest you this is your defence.

Cop- Hello , weak and controlled citizen. Why in the world would you think you had the right to defend yourself.

Citizen- I was being attacked by several People and I ran for my life and they gave chase, I ran screaming for help and nobody helped me or called the police and they surrounded me. I pulled a knife and cut one and then ran for my life.

"REMEMBER" everything has to be about YOUR LIFE.

on another note. If you are ever attacked by 1 or more people and you fall on the ground and you pull a knife. Remember to cut the person on the foot. for 2 good reasons.

1) it shows that you were prone on the ground "helpless" and he carried on his attack on you and you pulled your knife in fear of your LIFE and cut his foot or leg to stop him from kicking you to DEATH and you ran

2) Kicken a person while they are down can be consided attempted murder.

And always remember. If you pull a knife and cut someone DON'T go Freddy krugar on them. CUT and run! If they give chase and you can't out run them they will figure out in a few seconds that they had been slashed and you are ARMED and maybe it's a good idea to not chase. It also shows the cops that you showed RESTRAINT (Spelling?)

By the way. BJJ is great but being in that Dominant position while someone is lying on their back can fall into that. Why did you keep attacking him if he was down?
Why did you apply a Choke that the DA can turn around on you and say you were trying to CHOKE = KILL him.

Remember, The law does not want you to protect yourself. They really want you to lay there and get beat to death and wait for them to show up 5 mins later. The problem with the laws out look is. It only takes 1 to 2 mins for someone to beat you to death with a hammer. LOL!

In this article, I am not sure if there is cursing. So please forgive it if there is.


Here is a article that I think everyone should read.

Virtue of the Sword


by James Williams


Training in various, seemingly antiquated, military arts is becoming increasing common in our 21st century society. Why pursue these arts that require so much effort, discipline, and often pain? Why do we seek to test ourselves in struggle and training for combat? What brought us to these arts, and what do we hope to get out of this training?


I am frequently asked why I practice and teach classical warrior skills and adhere to a philosophy that appears outdated to many. The sword has defined the warrior for thousands of years. It has defined the power, ethics, duty and self-defense of a class of people who have shaped the face of civilization on this planet. The skill, exercise, mental development, and sheer pleasure of using a sword is unique. Hand-to-hand combat with edged weapons is the most demanding form of human physical combat. It not only requires the most skill, both physical and mental, it develops in the adept abilities that separate him from others and elevates intuition, reflexes, and technique to the highest degree. For the warrior, the sword represents his duty, his honor and his responsibility.


This is, for the most part, no longer a society that values the warrior and his virtues. Ours is a society that has forgotten the sacrifices and struggles of so many who came before them, the fruit of whose effort and sacrifice we daily enjoy; it is a society that will ask of its military, but not honor or care for its men. It is a society where virtue is often looked at askance, where character is not required of those who would seek to lead us. A society that enjoys enormous plenty yet denies its military the necessary munitions to train to protect this very wealth. Why do a significant number of its citizens seek training and embrace virtues that seem passe? Perhaps not all have forgotten that less than 60 years ago the entire world was involved in a great struggle to determine if a free nation could exist. Most of us know someone who participated in that struggle and through whose efforts we have the gift of choice and plenty which seems to be taken so lightly by so many.


"Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival". Winston Churchill

"For without victory there is no survival." These words define the role of the male in history, his service to life. The harsh reality of freedom in a nation, a fact that is overlooked or denied by many, is that our freedom is the direct result of our strength. It was by struggle and conflict that we became free and have kept ourselves that way. We have received from our ancestors, at great cost, a precious gift that must be cherished and nurtured if we are going to pass it on to our children. It must be protected, fought for if necessary, and we must not let this gift be taken from us by those whose rhetoric and actions are nonsense. These are people who seek things for themselves at the expense of the whole.


"Freedom means responsibility and that is why most men shun it."
George Bernard Shaw


Everywhere that you look in history this is the case. When our strength goes we will no longer be free. We will be dictated to and ruled by those stronger than ourselves. Does this mean that it is necessary to cultivate aggression and belligerence? Absolutely not! It does, however, mean that we need to cultivate in ourselves those virtues that guide a free people: courage, honor, truthfulness, responsibility, perseverance, charity, strength tempered with compassion, discrimination tempered with tolerance.


Virtue as a prerequisite for freedom


It is the very cultivation of virtue that ensures the will and ability to be a free people. A society degenerates with the loss of virtue and the high regard in which it is held. This has been the lesson of history. It is always surprising to me that the events and lessons learned from the past are so quickly forgotten. It is as if we deliberately purge them from our memory. Human history is fraught with the folly of this peculiar mechanism, yet we continue it at our peril.

"If you lose the past," the 9th century Chinese poet Meng Jiao says, "The will easily crumbles."
This blurring and removing of the past is a valuable tool of social architecture as is evidenced in modern China, one of many such examples in the 20th century. The misinformation and dis-information that make up so much of our current social and political agenda separates us from our past. This deliberate perversion of truth should be anathema to those who value virtue. It is anathema because those who use it seek to change the order of society with falsehoods. As warriors we do not have to go far back into history to find instances where the courage and sacrifice of a few have so benefited the whole.


"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few." These words were spoken by Prime Minister Winston Churchill in reference to the debt owed by the British people to the RAF during the Battle of Britain.


The reason we are called to cultivate classical warrior skills and virtues is out of a feeling of duty to the whole of society. We prepare ourselves for those times when we may be called upon to protect and defend. Any other reason is selfish and ultimately self-destructive. Being tough and a good fighter is not in and of itself noble. For me, training in kenjutsu and related military arts prepares me to be a good citizen. It enables me to be of assistance when it is necessary to protect and defend. It teaches me self-discipline that I may moderate my behavior. I learn perseverance and courage in the face of difficulty so that I am not easily deterred. All of this adds up to the courage to live life not just for oneself but also for others. For me, teaching is giving to others what has been given to me. Like having children, it is the completion of the cycle. What a benefit it will be to society as a whole if those of us who aspire to a noble nature strive to imbue society with care, commitment, and positive action! Look out for and protect those in need! Support each other when faced with those of evil nature who would prey on the weak and defenseless!


The noblest aspects of human consciousness, our virtues, become passe ever more quickly as we find substitutes for living a life connected with the reality of our existence. The less we grow, hunt, and gather our food, the less directly involved we are in protecting ourselves and our families and nation, the more readily we lose our virtue. The less we know of and value our past, The less we honor those who, with their courage and sacrifice, have bequeathed to us our current state of freedom and plenty, the less likely we are to pass this enviable state on to those who follow us. Are we so self-absorbed that our decisions are made on the basis of our personal wants and our ease? Are we as a people so easily bought that we will sell our freedom and that of our children for comfort?


The Warrior as protector of society


The warrior protects and defends because he realizes the value of others. He knows that they are essential to society and, in his gift of service, recognizes and values theirs. This responsibility translates to children as well. When in a public bathroom, keep an eye on any children that may be in there. Even wait an extra moment or two to make sure that they are safely out of the restroom before you leave. It is an unfortunate fact that public restrooms are frequented by pedophiles and potential kidnappers. Being a father myself I feel a serious responsibility to all children and hope that other males will help look after mine when I am not present. I cannot count the number of times that I have seen nervous mothers waiting outside of a public bathroom for a young son. Make a point, even to telling the mother, that you will keep an eye on the safety of her child in an area in which she cannot go.


There are other ways in which we can be of daily use. For instance, take the extra moment in dark parking lots at night to make sure that a woman gets into her car safely before leaving yourself. Daily involvement in acts such as these are as much a part of training as time spent in the dojo, and indeed should be the reason for that time spent training.


The role and ability to protect and defend does not give the warrior-protector the right to misuse this strength and knowledge. You are not superior to nor do you have the right to take advantage of others by means of this strength and ability. If you breach this trust and your sacred responsibility then you are not a warrior-protector. Over the centuries this power has been misused all too often in societies to dominate and control others. This is the dark side of power and has no place in the life of the warrior seeking to live a life of virtue.


When faced with a woman or child in a situation in which they are vulnerable, there are two types of men: those who would offer succor and aid, and those who would prey upon them. And in modern society, there is another loathsome breed who would totally ignore their plight!
I remember the first time my friends and I read about an incident that happened in New York City where a woman was attacked and eventually killed over an extended period of time. This was in the early 1960's, and I think the duration of the attack was 15 to 20 minutes. Neighbors in the area could hear her calls for help, however, no one had the courage to go to her aid. My friends and I were incredulous that something like this could take place in America. How could anyone, most especially men, hear a woman being murdered and not involve themselves in her defense. Many current laws actually place the person who would come to another's aid in legal jeopardy. Is this a sign of social and psychological health in a society?


In 1977 I was teaching and competing in boxing and kick boxing and teaching women and seniors self-defense through the Institute for Better Health in Santa Rosa, California. An incident took place in Rancho Cordova, California that had a big impact on me both as a man and a martial artist. This incident was a home invasion rape and murder. A husband and wife were both home when they heard a noise in the master bedroom. The man went to investigate and was confronted by an intruder with a knife who had entered through the bedroom window. Being threatened with the knife the husband capitulated and allowed himself to be led into the front room and tied to a chair. The criminal then raped the wife in front of the husband who could do nothing but watch. After finishing with the rape, the criminal got a hammer from the garage and proceeded to beat the husband to death in front of the wife. After he had brutally killed the husband he turned the hammer on the wife leaving her for dead. The wife, who was not dead, managed to crawl out of the house where neighbors heard her mewling and came to her aid. She suffered physical and emotional scars that marred her for life.


I often wonder what would go through a man's mind when he fails through fear and lack of training to fulfill his responsibility in such circumstances. We all have fear. That is why it is necessary to prepare, to train, to understand the part that we play in the dance of life. How much more honorable, more noble, to have engaged the assailant, even if there was slim chance for personal victory, and in doing so give your wife the opportunity to escape! Preparation for such an eventuality could have provided a better outcome for both.


In 1984, a good friend of mine, Toby Threadgill, who now teaches samurai arts in Texas, was faced with a more difficult situation. He was awakened from sleep by two men who had followed his wife home from her nursing job late one night with the intention of raping her. One held a gun to his head while the other went looking for his wife. Realizing their intent, and at the risk of his life, my friend managed to disarm the gunman by driving him through a sliding-glass door. Then confronted by the knife wielding second man he managed, although sustaining a serious wound, to disarm and incapacitate him. Although a likeable and easy going person, Toby had prepared himself mentally and physically so that when faced with a dangerous situation he had both the tools and the courage to use them. How much better the outcome!


Society becomes vulnerable to every kind of threat when men no longer feel the need to prepare themselves by acquiring skills to protect and defend society, especially women and children. When men no longer take responsibility for being male and when a sense of duty is replaced by self-concern and self-indulgence, society looses its greatest strength- the mutual caring and commitment of its citizens for each other.


Courtesy: a show of respect


Courtesy is an essential element for the warrior. It should be a defining act that can be practiced daily.


"To be a samurai is to be polite at all times."
Hojo Nagauji


Chivalry frames an ideal of heroic character. It combines invincible strength and valor, justice, modesty, loyalty to superiors, courtesy to equals, compassion for the weak, and devotion to God; it is an ideal which, even if never achieved in real life, has been widely acknowledged as the highest model for emulation.


These acts of courtesy are first and foremost for yourself. The respect and care that you have for yourself can then extend to other human beings. This altruistic value and most virtues are being sacrificed to the right of the individual to every form of indulgence. And, in that very process, the individual is then pressured to conform to the mores of the current political thinking of the State.
Showing courtesy is indicative of inner strength and security as a male. Courtesy is the lubricant of a culture, and should be the hallmark of the warrior. No situation is made worse by the exercise of courtesy and many situations are made the better for it. I enjoy showing courtesy towards women in the many ways that are available. When I hold a door open for a woman or help her carry an object, it is not that I think that she is not capable of doing it for herself. I do it in recognition of her intrinsic value to society and to me. Men are respected and shown courtesy as they earn the right. This process of earning respect is an important part of its value. The word loses its meaning and value in an atmosphere where many think that respect should be given just because a person exists regardless of his actions or value to the society.


An attitude of self-concern has grown more prevalent as our lives have become easier. Risking oneself for others or for a principle is less and less common. We have become less committed to each other and have created a world in which we seemingly do not need each other to survive. Virtues such as courage, honor, and integrity even carry a stigma in some circles. The very foundations of character are under attack by those who do not understand that there is nothing noble in being human without these virtues


It is not the role of everyone to be a warrior, however, those of us who respond to this calling should train and study to be the best that we are able. The are many guides and heroes that we can look to as warriors, and not all are male. One of mine, Mother Teresa, has just recently died. I find great inspiration in her life. Here is someone who found her life purpose and lived it steadfastly and, from my standpoint, even gloriously by giving to those too wretched for others to even consider. The courage, love and selfless sense of service that she displayed should serve to inspire us all. If I can live my life while giving just one fraction of what she gave to others it will be an accomplishment.
Teaching then becomes

a means whereby we can pass on to others the knowledge and wisdom acquired from those who have preceded us. It is not about self-aggrandizement or superiority. It is not about titles and rank, or organizations or profit. Most of the time I feel that I am learning more from my students than they are learning from me. The teacher becomes the student and the student the teacher. Neither can exist without the other.


As human beings we are all different. Having different skills, strengths, or abilities does not mean that an individual does not have abilities that benefit himself and society. I shun the sameness that is a part of much of modern social theory. It is abhorrent and detracts from what makes us human. I am a large, strong male, over six feet tall and weighing over 200 pounds who has spent the majority of his adult life involved in military and combative activities, studies and training. My wife is a foot shorter and over 100 pounds lighter. We are physically suited for different tasks in life. I respect and cherish her strength and femininity. And the more so because I have been at her side, in what limited capacity a man may provide, while she bore our two children with only her courage and my meager assistance and encouragement to sustain her.


"When the choice is between cowardice and violence, I would strongly recommend violence."
Mohandus Ghandi


We are no longer training our children, especially our young men, to deal with pain, defeat, and discomfort with a brave heart and stoic spirit. We seem to think that by removing consequences for their actions we are actually benefiting them. They do not build true character based on trial and effort.


When there is no pain, no death, no challenge, no struggle, no adversity, and no disappointment we will lose the best part of being human. When we structure a life and society devoid of every human challenge there will be no courage, no perseverance, no honor, no compassion, no caring, and no commitment. We will have lost the best parts of who we are because we will have let our fear steal them from us. We will no longer need each other and this will be the greatest tragedy.
Being a warrior means being committed to making the ultimate sacrifice and also committing the ultimate act. The gentleman warrior must take responsibility for his actions and use his power for the good of society and his fellow human beings. As the old samurai saying goes, "To kill when it is right to kill and to die when it is right to die!" In a similar vein, the code of the Sumerian warrior-king stated that he was to act as the shepherd of his people. The role of the warrior as a stabilizing influence in civilized society and protector of the weak is as old as civilization itself.

Sparta vs. Greece


Many, women more often than men, feel that being a warrior means being an oppressor. History, however, does not necessarily bear out this idea. In Sparta, the strongest warrior culture that the Greeks produced, the woman had the most freedom of any Grecian woman of the time. The women, received much the same education as the young men, and shared a life with their men far closer than did the women of Athens.


In sexual matters, the Spartans, true to their nature, seem to have had the highest rate of monogamy in all of Greece. They held their woman in high esteem and Spartan women had greater equality than their Grecian sisters who were treated according to the more Oriental standards towards women of the rest of Greece.


The Spartans were also renowned for their virtue and being the most pious of all Greeks. There is a story told by Plutarch about the Spartans at one of the Olympiads. In the crowded throng at the Olympic games, an old man was looking in vain for a seat from which to watch the events. His stumbling attempts to find one were noticed by many Greeks from other states, who mocked him for his age and difficulty in finding a seat. When, however, he came to the section where the Spartans were seated, every man among them rose to his feet and offered him their seats. Somewhat abashed, but nevertheless admiringly, the other Greeks applauded them for their behavior. "Ah," the old man is reported to have said with a sigh, "I see what it is. All Greeks know what is right, but only the Spartans do it.'"


Woman also fared well in other warrior societies. Viking woman owned their own property and could divorce their husbands if they were mistreated. The Celts of Britannia often had women as rulers and many tribes were matriarchal. It is false to think that because men are warriors that it follows that they look down on women.


Peace and pacifism are not congruent with each other. Albert Einstein realized the 1930's that his pacifistic approach to Nazi Germany would not work.
"He experienced that the ultimate ethical values, on which all human existence is based, must, as a last resort, be defended even by force and with the sacrifice of human lives..."
Max Born on Albert Einstein's realizations prior to the Second World War.


How can we forget the courage and sacrifice of those that have gone before us in providing us with freedom and plenty. How can we not take up the torch to provide this same freedom to those who come after. We should honor all who have given of themselves with the ultimate sacrifice that provides us with what we not enjoy, even if this sacrifice was long ago and far away.


"Go tell the Spartans, stranger passing by, that here, according to her laws we lie."
Epitaph written by the poet Simonides at the ancient monument celebrating Spartan courage and sacrifice at Thermopylae that was instrumental in holding off the Persians under Xerxes and preserving the concept of democracy for the world to come.


Virtue must be taught and practiced; it must be nurtured and passed to each generation. Freedom must be taught and practiced as well. If not, it easily perishes. Virtue and freedom go hand in hand. Not to cherish the one is not to cherish the other. A society that looses the warriors' virtues is the poorer for it and will soon be a society whose freedoms are lost. The male has a genetic prime directive-a service to life-to protect and defend. In this service he is historically more expendable than the female and the children. Every man is responsible for defending every woman and every child When the male no longer assumes this role, when he no longer has the courage or moral responsibility, society will cease to value honor and virtue. Neither laws nor government can replace this personal caring and commitment. In the absence of the warrior-protector, the only way that a government can protect a society is to remove the freedom of its people. And in such a society, the sons and daughters of lions become sheep.


Mr. Lancaster:

As a licensed attorney who practices Criminal Defense, I can assure you, and I mean this with all respect, that your argument is so full of holes that a 1st year baby lawyer can walk through it (at least in a Texas courtroom).

I have never taken Masaad Ayoob's class, but I will ask one simple question: is he a lawyer? If the answer to the question is "no," then what are you doing listening to him for legal advice? Would you go to a commercial real estate developer if you needed open-heart surgery? If he is a lawyer, then my next question is: "in what jurisdictions is he licensed to practice?" Unless the answer to that question is "all 50 states and the District of Columbia and territory of Puerto Rico (which would be a REALLY neat trick)," I would confine his area of expertise to where he is licensed and where he has practiced law. Emphasis on PRACTICED law. As a person who has tried cases and been under the gun, I have little patience for those who will tell me their theories if they have never applied them in a real-life situation.

The law is not something you can pigeonhole, especially for something as complex as "self defense." Add a weapon to the mix and you are really moving on thin ice.

You want legal advice on self defense in your jurisdiction? Go talk to a licensed attorney who deals with criminal law in your jurisdiction. Pay for a consultation (although many criminal defense attorneys give free consults). It will be an hour well spent.

So, let's move away from this complex topic. It has nothing to do with Mid/Renn martial arts and certainly is a off-topic.

I do appreciate the article by James Williams, however.
------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>gene tausk
Free-Scholar
Study Group Leader - Houston ARMA Southside
ARMA Forum Moderator


Return to “Unarmed Skills Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.