Vital point striking in Kampfringen/Arte dell Abrazzare

European historical unarmed fighting techniques & methods

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Corey Roberts
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: Pyeongtaek, South Korea

Vital point striking in Kampfringen/Arte dell Abrazzare

Postby Corey Roberts » Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:13 pm

I know there are plenty of nasty strikes to what would be called "vital points" within medieval/renaissance grappling systems. Has anybody catalogued or categorized what sorts of weak parts of the human anatomy the manuals tell us to apply unmerciful force to?
--Scholar-Adept
Pyeongtaek
Republic of Korea

User avatar
Sal Bertucci
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:04 pm
Location: Denver area, CO

Postby Sal Bertucci » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:20 pm

I've never cataloged anything, but he two things that come straight to my mind are the chest area over the heart and the testicles.

User avatar
Jaron Bernstein
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:58 am

Re: Vital point striking in Kampfringen/Arte dell Abrazzare

Postby Jaron Bernstein » Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:53 pm

Corey Roberts wrote:I know there are plenty of nasty strikes to what would be called "vital points" within medieval/renaissance grappling systems. Has anybody catalogued or categorized what sorts of weak parts of the human anatomy the manuals tell us to apply unmerciful force to?


A modern catalog? Not to my knowledge. I am a big believer in learning from the manuals themselves as much as possible.

User avatar
Keith Culbertson
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Columbus OH

Postby Keith Culbertson » Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:12 am

maybe Jaron did not read you fully Corey, I believe you are asking whether someone in ARMA or otherwise in RMA has created a catalogue of 'vital point' attacks from the manuals for us to use? I have not seen one.

Nevertheless, for unarmored, such points remain the same throughout all martial arts: any joint, anywhere there are nerve clusters closer to the surface (temple, underarm, inside thigh, etc...), and relatively exposed organs (testicles, eyes, kidneys, etc...).

In the case of armored, it is all about finding the way under/past the shell to the person.
Keith, SA

User avatar
Tyrone Artur Budzin
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:27 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Tyrone Artur Budzin » Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:35 pm

There is this book published by medieval practitioner Hugh Knight which consolidates the German Combat Ringen system of the medieval period. Below is the link.

http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-b ... at/2077141

Has anyone had the chance to read it? A readers review on the book would be highly appreciated.
"If there is a Peace to be found on the other side of War....then I will fight for it."

Jonathan Newhall
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:41 pm

Postby Jonathan Newhall » Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:37 pm

Isn't he the "no test cutting" and "block with the edge" guy?

User avatar
Tyrone Artur Budzin
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:27 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Tyrone Artur Budzin » Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:49 pm

Not so sure, I did correspond with him and it does seem he is pretty well versed with medieval Ringen. His whole system focuses on the German fechtbuchs published from around the 13th to 15th century as far as I can tell.
"If there is a Peace to be found on the other side of War....then I will fight for it."

User avatar
Randall Pleasant
Posts: 872
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Flower Mound, Texas, USA

Postby Randall Pleasant » Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:48 pm

Jonathan Newhall wrote:Isn't he the "no test cutting" and "block with the edge" guy?


Yes and no, Hugh Knight probably does some test cutting but he is best known for believing that sparring is bad for a swordsmen, ie. he believes one picks up bad habbits in sparring. Of course any time a teacher refuses to spar you can bet he probably sucks really bad. I strongly encourage all ARMA member to not waste a single penny on any of the books my Hugh Knight. I would also point out to ARMA members that few people hate ARMA like Hugh Knight , personally that alone is reason enough not to support him with a single penny!
Ran Pleasant

User avatar
Tyrone Artur Budzin
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:27 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Tyrone Artur Budzin » Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:07 pm

Randall Pleasant wrote:
Jonathan Newhall wrote:Isn't he the "no test cutting" and "block with the edge" guy?


Yes and no, Hugh Knight probably does some test cutting but he is best known for believing that sparring is bad for a swordsmen, ie. he believes one picks up bad habbits in sparring. Of course any time a teacher refuses to spar you can bet he probably sucks really bad. I strongly encourage all ARMA member to not waste a single penny on any of the books my Hugh Knight. I would also point out to ARMA members that few people hate ARMA like Hugh Knight , personally that alone is reason enough not to support him with a single penny!


Really?? I find that hard to believe after my correspondence with him. I guess the only way for me to find out is to shell out some cash to see if the book is any good...
"If there is a Peace to be found on the other side of War....then I will fight for it."

User avatar
Jaron Bernstein
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:58 am

Postby Jaron Bernstein » Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:56 am

Tyrone Artur Budzin wrote:
Randall Pleasant wrote:
Jonathan Newhall wrote:Isn't he the "no test cutting" and "block with the edge" guy?


Yes and no, Hugh Knight probably does some test cutting but he is best known for believing that sparring is bad for a swordsmen, ie. he believes one picks up bad habbits in sparring. Of course any time a teacher refuses to spar you can bet he probably sucks really bad. I strongly encourage all ARMA member to not waste a single penny on any of the books my Hugh Knight. I would also point out to ARMA members that few people hate ARMA like Hugh Knight , personally that alone is reason enough not to support him with a single penny!


Really?? I find that hard to believe after my correspondence with him. I guess the only way for me to find out is to shell out some cash to see if the book is any good...



Knight's "no sparring" approach is flawed IMO. First, there is ample record that the the historical masters did spar and engage in free play, both blossfechten and harnessfechten. The English had schools of defense where your progress was measured by playing your prize in sparring. Meyer is all about sparring. When Dobringer talks about school fighting and earnest fighting, his school fighting was oppositional freeplay, not just drills. I can cite other examples as well if you need. To use a modern analogy if you want to be a good football team, you can (and should) do all manner of conditioning and drills. But you cannot progress beyond a certain point unless you actually play another oposing team in competition, even if it is just a series of friendly backyard matches.

If you want to buy Mr. Knight's translations, that is one thing. The original manual in translation is still the work of the masters. But a book of his teaching method is flawed. Every historical fencer or WMA group that I respect at some point (some early in training and some later) has its members engage in freeplay.

User avatar
Tyrone Artur Budzin
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:27 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Tyrone Artur Budzin » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:13 am

I do agree sparring is an important aspect of learning skills taught in the fechtbuchs. The question is not about translation I think but of interpretation with regard to Hugh Knight's book. Are his definitions both effective and historically accurate? That will be the most important question of all.
"If there is a Peace to be found on the other side of War....then I will fight for it."

User avatar
Jaron Bernstein
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:58 am

Postby Jaron Bernstein » Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:28 am

Tyrone Artur Budzin wrote:I do agree sparring is an important aspect of learning skills taught in the fechtbuchs. The question is not about translation I think but of interpretation with regard to Hugh Knight's book. Are his definitions both effective and historically accurate? That will be the most important question of all.


I am not a translator. I can pick out specific words, but translating a text is beyond my skills. I don't know how accurate his translations are.

User avatar
Tyrone Artur Budzin
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:27 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Tyrone Artur Budzin » Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:10 am

I am getting the impression his book might not be worth purchasing after all.
"If there is a Peace to be found on the other side of War....then I will fight for it."


Return to “Unarmed Skills Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.