Sparring vs. not

Old Archived Discussions on Specific Passages from Medieval & Renaissance Fencing Texts


Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
John_Clements
Posts: 1167
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2002 10:43 pm
Location: Atlanta area

Re: Sparring vs. not - rapier

Postby John_Clements » Wed Jun 04, 2003 12:56 pm

Sigh...yes and no, Sean.
I’ve written about this at length before.
On the one hand, we need to use very stiff non flexible rapiers in order to get the correct blade play to affect proper rapier movements and foyning techniques.
On the other, while we are making good point contact in rapier, we still don’t know if for sure a "particular" thrust would have been instantly debilitating or incapacitating and how long the opponent might continue fighting on after a “particular” wound --same for the minor harassing punctures and lacerations --which we can’t really simulate with a rapier to any realistic effect in sparring.

My research then, for some time has been aimed toward just how it was that 16th century schools actually taught rapier and how they employed free play as a learning tool? They foiled their points we know, and they avoided the face (no masks), but we no little else.

JC
Do NOT send me private messages via Forum messenger. I NEVER read them. To contact me please use direct email instead.


Return to “Virtual Classroom - closed archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.