Postby Jaron Bernstein » Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:55 pm
Stewart wrote: "Well, I suppose you can start from posta di falcon suprana e altera. At that point I would suggest that posta sagitaria is actually the result of (1) a decending falso filo strike, or (2) a left to right zwerch like motion."
I can see how the zwerch would get your hands in the posta sagitaria, but one thing doesn't seem right on that regard. The blade in the illustration if vertical. Wouldn't the blade at the end of a zwerch be horizontal? Of course, it could just be how the illustrator showed the blade and not its actual position.
Stewar wrote: "Either one of those cuts is capable of displacing and striking the opponent simultaneously to achieve Vadi's "Volerica" effect. I'd say that if this is the case Archer does, "use much malice in [its] reign." Either way, I think that the thrusting and cutting possibilities available from this position justify the text. From Archer you can zwerch to the other side, cover with a hengen type ward, cut a strong fendente strike, thrust high, middle, and low, cut a dritto filo rota, etc."
(juggling waster, manual and keyboard <img src="/forum/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" /> ) Cool. I can see all of those from the Archer.
Steward wrote: "As for where we start from? Well, we can start from Posta di Vera Finestra (17r), Porta di fero piana terrena (16v) and change over to throw the point around for either a falso filo cut or, again, a sturtzhaw type thrust. You could even start from posta lunga con la spada curta (long stance with the sword withdrawn, 17r, bottom) and execute a coverta to Archer, or again a zwerch. Also, a dritto filo rota with the arms extended can cut to Archer."
(puts down waster) OK, I can see how those would work. I think my mistake was to look at it as if there was only one way to get there and only 1 or 2 uses for the thing.
Stewart wrote: "Interesting. Did you read the footnote?"
Yup. The footnote certainly seems plausible. I read the footnote as the guy on the right throwing in a "buffalo" wild swing, the guy on the left trying to displace it with a shielhau and the guy on the right then switching to a halfsword as a counter.
Stewart wrote: " It compares this plate to Fiore's "Punta Falsa" but I think that there really is something to your interpretation."
I am not so sure that I am suggesting an interpretation, having not studied Fiori at all (yet) and being a bit new to this. I am ONLY trying to say with any certainty that the fellow on the left at the bottom of 18R looks like he is trying a schiller type displacement due to where his thumb is on the blade and it looks like his short edge is down (see my discussion with Jay on this very point). One thing about Vadi is that if you look at all the illustrations, the hand positions are very carefully drawn so you CAN (IMO) get a sense of exactly where maestro Vadi wants the hands to be.
Stewart wrote: "The text, "Thanks to the quick turn I have made with my sword I will strike you without pause" suggests to me an action similar to zucken (twitching) or duplieren (doubling).Perhaps the guy who is halfswording deflected a fendente, and the other "twitched" back around the defenders blade with a schiller-like false edge strike to the hand.I think that it definitely bears further experimentation, though I suggest hand protection for the man who halfswords in order to perform this with enough vigor to see if it would really work."
That didn't occur to me at all, but looking at the illustration, I DO see how that could work, and it would jive with the "quick turn I have made with the sword, striking without pause".
Stewart wrote: " I think I'll give it a go tomorrow at practice. The only problem that I have with this interpretation is that it appears that the man with the thumbed grip has his left leg forward, though his original cut could be left to right and he twitches back around the other way."
Well, one thing to consider is that Vadi's footwork (folio 11V) seems to allow for power generation by means other than stepping through or back, if my reading of that is correct (it may well not be). So arguably the fellow didn't NEED to change his stance.
Let me know what how it works, and once again thanks to you guys for sharing your insights.
Jaron Bernstein
Columbus - ARMA