Hi Tim,
"I think that Silver is great fun to read, and I used to think like him when I made fun of such a "whimpy and weakling weapon" as the Rapier (NOTE: That was BEFORE my Rapier Appreciation Training!

)"
I wouldn't call it wimpy. Silver seems to argue that an overly lengthy rapier is hard to withdraw, so if you can get past it with a shorter weapon, you can just have fun. He also seems bothered by its limited ability to ward off big hacking cuts. Whether this is valid, I don't know.
Tim wrote: "I think his complaint is against sensationalizing a weapon system and teaching techniuqes that get people killed and hurt. He saw that fencing should help prepare people for war, and the rapier Doesn't do this at all."
Harder to make a "true cross" to defend with, if I read it correctly.
Tim wrote: "I still think I prefer a cut and thrust, but maybe it is because I am not trained enough with rapier."
I ain't trained with either yet. Ask me in a few years.