Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Old Archived Discussions on Specific Passages from Medieval & Renaissance Fencing Texts


Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Jake_Norwood
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:46 am
Location: Clarksville, TN

Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Jake_Norwood » Tue Jan 14, 2003 12:13 pm

I've been working for CW for about 2 months now, and something has been bugging me from the get-go. Bart, in the little handout for it, refers to the basic bind as stemming from zornhau on zornhau. From the pictures in Wallerstein this seems correct, but from full-speed motions it seems less so...the bulk of my experience of zorhau-on-zornhau causes a few things:
1 - Edge-on-ede contact...
2 - ...unless one of us compensates for it by introducing our flat (which changes the dynamic of the binds in the manual) or by striking our edge to their flat (which seems to result in an effective versetzen--not a bad thing at all, but not what's in the manual).

I actually have a lot I want to discuss out of Wallerstein, but we'll start with that. Thoughts, comments?
Sen. Free Scholar
ARMA Deputy Director

User avatar
TimSheetz
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 4:55 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby TimSheetz » Tue Jan 14, 2003 9:13 pm

Hi Jake,

I think that you are right.. zornhau to zornhau could make edge to edge contact... but you wouldn't be swinging a zornhau if you thought you were going to hit another zornhau... but once it happens, the binding is a course of action.

That is one explanation I can think of.

What do folks think of the feasibility of this explanation?

Tim Sheetz
Tim Sheetz
ARMA SFS

User avatar
Randall Pleasant
Posts: 872
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Flower Mound, Texas, USA

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Randall Pleasant » Tue Jan 14, 2003 9:43 pm

Ringeck states:
When your adversary strikes at you from his right side with a strike from above, then hit with a strike of wrath from your right shoulder against it. Strike with your true edge and in your strong. When he is weak at the sword then, thrust into his face along his blade.


I that this to mean that when the adversary cuts a Zornhau at you, you cut a Zornhau (with a passing step) not at the adversary but at his sword so that your true edge hits the flat of his sword knocking it off line. By pulling your sword hilt to your far left side you have your sword between you and the sword of the adversary with your strong true edge against his weak flat (the position is something like a high left Pflug or a low left Ochs, is this what Meyer calls the Key guard?), and your point inches from his face. Since your arms are pulled back you are able to make a very powerful thrust into his face or upper body. This is different from what is shown in the pictures in the Tobler book where he interpreted the statement as meaning to cut a Zornhau <u>at the adversary</u> rather than at his sword. Thus, Tobler shows an edge-on-edge bind rather than an edge-on-flat bind.
Ran Pleasant

User avatar
Shawn Cathcart
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 10:04 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Shawn Cathcart » Thu Jan 16, 2003 12:24 pm

Remember also that you want to do displacements with more of the strong of your blade, and that leads very well into binding. So when he cuts Zornhau, you beat high with the strong of your blade, it very much looks like a Zornhau cut as well, but you want your strong, on his weak. I find many people don't pay attention and do most of their beats with the weak half of their blade.

Also in a lot of the binding it says to wind your strong to the weak of his blade. Well if you displace properly with more of your strong on his weak, you'll find your almost there anyway, and winding and binding can take place much faster.

User avatar
Jake_Norwood
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:46 am
Location: Clarksville, TN

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Jake_Norwood » Fri Jan 17, 2003 12:26 pm

Understood and agreed. However, if you look at the plates of Wallerstein, that isn't what's happening. There are some strange things going on in there, and live practice with steel has revealed a lot of it, but it's also left a few questions open now.
Sen. Free Scholar

ARMA Deputy Director

User avatar
Shawn Cathcart
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 10:04 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Shawn Cathcart » Fri Jan 17, 2003 5:41 pm

Heh you'll get no arguement with me on that one <img src="/forum/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />. Steel definately is needed to make the winding work period, it just can't be felt properly at all with wasters. We've recently tried doing a little more work with this, also trying the winds from Ringeck. Its one of the things that most of us are still working on in some form or another. It depends a lot on timing, you have a very short amount of time to execute a winding technique, and if you don't succeed it can sometimes leave you quite open. Perhaps why it is mentioned that many a man had died trying to master the art of it.

Anyway, which plate in particular in Wallerstein are you looking at, maybe we can play around with some of them here as well and see what we come up with.

Bart Walczak
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2002 4:12 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Contact:

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Bart Walczak » Mon Feb 17, 2003 4:55 pm

The Zornhau against Zornhau does not result in edge-on-edge contact despite on how it might look like on the movie. I can't explain it in e-mail. I will show it in NY.

Jake, the whole idea is to get a bit "higher" than your opponent. Then you hit into his flat with your edge.

User avatar
Jake_Norwood
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:46 am
Location: Clarksville, TN

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Jake_Norwood » Mon Feb 17, 2003 10:59 pm

Jake, the whole idea is to get a bit "higher" than your opponent. Then you hit into his flat with your edge.


Ah, yes, I know. That does seem to be the secret, but I'm trying to see how this is superior to striking the flat with force to displace, instead of "sticking" to his sword. Also, it's my impression that the binds in Wallerstein happen as a result of both parties trying to cut the other, not one trying to hit the other's flat (which, as you wrote, is easily done by raising the hilt a little).

I gotta say that the Forum has never been so useful as now. Wonderful stuff.

Jake
Sen. Free Scholar

ARMA Deputy Director

Bart Walczak
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2002 4:12 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Contact:

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Bart Walczak » Tue Feb 18, 2003 1:53 pm

Uh... I can't really explain it. Try to "throw" your sword at your opponent, instead of "hacking" through him. You'll end up in pflug or in the long point...

And you don't have to try hitting his flat. Just straighten your arms and hit his head...

Better shown than explained in writing...

User avatar
Jake_Norwood
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:46 am
Location: Clarksville, TN

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Jake_Norwood » Tue Feb 18, 2003 2:33 pm

Barcie-

I'll take a whack at it (no pun intended) and try to get what you're saying tonight at practice, and I'll report back.

Jake
Sen. Free Scholar

ARMA Deputy Director

User avatar
Jeffrey Hull
Posts: 678
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:40 pm
Location: USA

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Jeffrey Hull » Tue Feb 18, 2003 6:32 pm

JN:

I think that in general when one counters by "mirroring" (opposing a strike with the same strike), by its very nature, it is more likely that edge-to-edge shall happen. However, I think your modification seems a decent way to get around this. Good luck, JH
JLH

*Wehrlos ist ehrlos*

User avatar
Randall Pleasant
Posts: 872
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Flower Mound, Texas, USA

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Randall Pleasant » Sat Feb 22, 2003 6:04 pm

Jake

Goliath has a much better art than the Codex Wallerstein. In Image 1 of Goliath you also get a better feel for the Length and Reach that CW talks about in Plate 5 and Plate 6.

Image

In case you are interested, Image 2 of Goliath shows the same action as Plate 8 of CW.

Image

Hope this helps.
Ran Pleasant

User avatar
Jake_Norwood
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:46 am
Location: Clarksville, TN

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Jake_Norwood » Sat Feb 22, 2003 11:43 pm

Randall-

Those are fine images, but here (as often) I get the picture that you've not read a single thing I've posted...these pictures have nothing to do with the issue at hand (that I can see, though I could just be missing it), nor do they resemble plates 5 and 6 from CW in any way other than the presence of swords and combatants.

(That being said I do appreciate that you're trying to help me understand something by referring the manuals and giving me images...I just think that your answers are for different questions than the ones I asked. Those are fantastic images referencing the use/importants of length and reach, which are addressed in the text of plates 5 and 6, but they aren't part of what's puzzled me here).

Jake
Sen. Free Scholar

ARMA Deputy Director

User avatar
Randall Pleasant
Posts: 872
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Flower Mound, Texas, USA

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Randall Pleasant » Sun Feb 23, 2003 1:52 am

...the bulk of my experience of zorhau-on-zornhau causes a few things:
1 - Edge-on-edge contact...
2 - ...unless one of us compensates for it by introducing our flat (which changes the dynamic of the binds in the manual) or by striking our edge to their flat (which seems to result in an effective versetzen--not a bad thing at all, but not what's in the manual).


Jake

I in this post that I hope I am addressing your primary question. Like Bart, I find it hard to explain. After all, we are trying to explain what we think the masters were trying to explain. <img src="/forum/images/icons/smirk.gif" alt="" /> It's like trying to write instructions on how to tie your shoes. <img src="/forum/images/icons/confused.gif" alt="" /> I will try to go step by step in order to form a better picture of what should be happening.

The first thing to consider is that your Zornhau <u>cannot</u> be aimed at the adversary. Since a Zornhau is thrown at about 45 degree angle from the right shoulder to the adversary's left upper opening. You can think of the mid-point of the cut as being a long-point in the adversary's heart (having cut from the left side of the adversary's body). Thus, two men cutting a Zornhau at each other at the very same time, with the very same speed and force, etc., would result in their swords binding <u>as</u> they have kill each other. In the technique, as described by all of the masters, the adversary has started a Zornhau, meaning he is in the Before, and you are reacting to the cut, meaning you are in the After. This means that if you cut at the adversary then his sword will cut into your body before your sword reaches him. At best, both of you will be killed, but more than likely he will kill you without suffering a serious wound.

We now know that 1) you must stop the adversary's Zornhau before you can perform a counter cut/thrust, and 2) your actions to stop the adversary's Zornhau must allow you to make up the time difference of him being in the Before and you being in the After. The goal of your Zornhau is to stop the adversary's Zornhau while leaving you in the Before.

As stated earlier, the adversary's Zornhau will be coming from his right shoulder to the upper left section of your body. The path of your Zornhau will be in front of the adversary's left shoulder, completely missing his body. This path is shorter than the path of his cut, thus you make up the time difference. Also, your Zornhau can be a little closer to the body - shorter path - since you are not trying to cut the adversary at this point in the technique. With the correct timing, your Zornhau is coming down as the adversary's Zornhau is coming down, resulting in your long edge striking the flat of the adversary's blade and knocking it off of its path. At the very least your Zornhau will stop the adversary's Zornhau and leave his blade on the outside of your blade. A bind may or may not happen, it depends upon the amount of energy in each of the Zornhau cuts. If there is a bind then most likely the strong of your blade will be against the weak of the adversary's blade. Regardless of a bind or no bind, you are now in the Before and can thrust at the adversary. If needed, you can wind your blade to the upper left during the thrust, keeping his sword to the outside. At this point you should be in a position similar to what is shown in Image 1 of Goliath.

Being slower than most of the other members of our study group I found that when I use this technique in sparring I do better if I step directly into the adversary's attack. This leaves me in a high left Pflug with the adversary's blade on my strong and my long edge guard and my point just inches from the adversary, which makes it hard for them to display before I can complete a thrust. The downside is that against senior ARMA scholars this opens me up for grappling, which I am not very good at.

Hope this makes sense. I really should not try to write in the late night. <img src="/forum/images/icons/crazy.gif" alt="" />
Ran Pleasant

User avatar
Jake_Norwood
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:46 am
Location: Clarksville, TN

Re: Binding in Codex Wallerstein

Postby Jake_Norwood » Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:42 pm

Randall-

Now I feel like we're getting somewhere. Thanks for sticking with it.

The key principle that seems to reoccur here is that this sort of a bind doesn't take place indes when two fighters are trying to kill each other. Now, that seems counter to the images, but I'm also willing to take the images with a grain of salt. Of course one can enter a bind in the circumstances you describe (although I maintain that a versetsen with some force will get you farther in life than such a bind, which leaves that interperetation suspect, even if it's the best we've got). What you and (it seems) Bart are describing is what we practice. I guess I just wanted something different, and this thing hasn't turned up...I'm dissapointed, perhaps.

Some things to consider:
1) If I am in the after, and my edge comes into contact with his flat, and I haven't used enough energy to re-direct his blade, then what really happens? Experience with wood and steel seems to imply that we end up in a bind--but not the one pictured in plates 5 and 6 of CW.
2) You wrote "The first thing to consider is that your Zornhau cannot be aimed at the adversary." Now, this may be correct, but it seems counter to what the masters generally teach--that every strike aims to strike you opponent (or open him up for a strike). Binding is a tricky thing, and risky without sufficient skill...if what you're describing is correct, then why even bother when a meisterhau or forceful versetzen would do the same job even more effectively.

Make sense?

I've been practicing what (I think) you're describing, and yet it seems to lack the ferocity of real violence.

Jake
Sen. Free Scholar

ARMA Deputy Director


Return to “Virtual Classroom - closed archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.