Postby s_taillebois » Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:06 pm
No doubt about the quality issues and MRL wasters. My statements were largely directed to the changes needed to their equipment to provide somewhat more durability.
However, it is likely there will be more questions on the matter. Simply because, as far as sales numbers, the people at MRL seem to be one of the larger distributors. As such, many will first become exposed to this discipline/sport via their marketing presence. So if someone buys MRL stuff, oh well, at least they got a start.
But...that's another reason why it would be nice if MRL kept their quality more consistant.
Wasters, much of what is practiced could be done as with handmades as well, not exactly like the means to build one is a lost art, or some unrevealed trade secret.
In the past, it seems that odd things such as baleen were also used for practice implements. But fairly little is marketed in a modern material which would be equivalent. Although such would seem to be ideal...stiff enough for use, but with some flex for safety.
But this is a discipline/sport with a very small number of adherents, and so not much market impetus to provide a wider range of alternatives in training gear and other implements. Alas gentry, the katana, bo and lord knows what else...contingent...vastly outnumber those studying Renn. swords, staffs and such...
Steven Taillebois