Another odd question

[William Savage]

When did swords become longswords and exactly how long were swords before this.

I know their was a langth increase in swords from the 11 century to the 12 century and judging by the replicas I'v seen it apears the handle length increased as well.

Is this it, was the long sword any sword after 1100? Or were their two distinct increases in blade length and one has managed to evade me?

Thanks in advance

[William Savage]

Im considering buying one of these swords but it is a vary important decision as they are so expensive for me. Im asking about the progresion of sword lengths because depending on wich sword i get i could have a significant advantage/disadvantage relative to the time period im trying to train in.
[image]http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/squire-photos.htm[/image] [image]http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/crecy-photos.htm[/image]
the big one is 44" long does anyone know if this would ever have been used with a shield?

Any input about any of my questions, or general coments would be much appreciated

Thanks!!

[Bill Tsafa]

Someone asked a similar question in another thread. See "what is a bastard sword". In that thread I said that the terminogy often was different from one region to another and through different time periods.

I own many swords and I have found that the long triangle shaped one is the best one for the German fighting style. The weight is balance towards the handle which makes for faster recoveries and is well suited for thrusting. If you prefer a cutting and bashing style of fighting look for one where the blade is more parallel down the length.

I recently learned of a Roman Spatha (cavelry sword) that was 40 inches. This was rare, the norm was 26 inches, but it shows that blacksmiths were experimenting with sword length before the 11 th century.

I recomend you ask the actual question in the subject line so everyone will know what the thread is about.