Postby s_taillebois » Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:41 am
M. Savage,
Very possible your observation is correct. But, the artistic conventions of the Gothic, and Early Renn. may have also played a role in those images. In the art of the period, they tended to hold to a fairly rigid set of conventions. In some terms, very different from us. They were concerned with portraying the symbolic meanings as much as literal information. (For example battle scenes often are allegorical as much as showing a specific event).
So the literalism in imagery, which we use in our visual information, was perceived very differently in the early modern era. Which presents problems in looking at their images of battles and etc.
For example, the illustrations in fechtbuchs, become more literally accurate...about the same time as Polluaillo and co. were emphasizing human anatomy in art. And even then, allegory was involved...for example Antonio Polluaillo's "Battle of 10 Men". c. 1465
You may be right but have to be careful about reading too literally into Gothic, Early Renn. images.
We see a dagger or knife, while looking at the same object, they often saw in such things a tontine...
Steven Taillebois