Which wood?

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Nick Hames
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:38 am

Which wood?

Postby Nick Hames » Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:01 am

<img src="/forum/images/icons/confused.gif" alt="" /> Which wood is better for making wooden wasters; Oak or Hickory? <img src="/forum/images/icons/confused.gif" alt="" />

Thank you for your time
~Nick

User avatar
M Wallgren
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:09 pm
Location: Östersund, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Which wood?

Postby M Wallgren » Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:06 am

Hickory!

Oak is a tad bit to brittle! My experience is that hickory lasts longer.
Martin Wallgren,
ARMA Östersund, Sweden, Studygroup Leader.

User avatar
Nick Hames
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:38 am

Re: Which wood?

Postby Nick Hames » Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:08 am

Thank You <img src="/forum/images/icons/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/icons/grin.gif" alt="" />

User avatar
Jonathan Scott
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 6:43 pm
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Re: Which wood?

Postby Jonathan Scott » Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:08 pm

to add another wood in the mix, what about Ash?
What are its advantages/disadvantages to hickory? I think I remember on the Raven Waster site something about Ash being better suited for anything that's doing thrusting (a little more give that way), and hickory for all around impact durability (so as an example say an english quarterstaff, maybe a wooden rapier foil of ash and a messer or longsword made of hickory), can I get a confirmation on that?
Also, which woods were actually used (I'm guessing Ash and oak were in there, but what other woods? I think I remember poplar and linden being used perhaps for shields...)for wooden wasters historically in regions of Europe (England, Germany, and Italy being the main places in question as that's where most of our manuals come from, right?)? Do we know? Do they have hickory in Europe? Or did medieaval and renaissance men-at-arms focus more on training with steel blunts (like the feders in the German manuals I have seen thusfar), and wooden wasters were more of an introductory tool for beginning and/or younger scholers of the sword?

User avatar
Rod-Thornton
Posts: 163
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Outer Banks of NC but currently freezing in Rhode Island

Re: Which wood?hmmm...now hang on a bit...

Postby Rod-Thornton » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:41 pm

"Hickory!

Oak is a tad bit to brittle! My experience is that hickory lasts longer...."

I am not so quick to opine in the absolute. I own both sorts of wooden wasters....and here's what I can tell you about each.

1. Hickory - sure, harder, Raven waster is good, but when it failed (after 1.5 weeks of service!) it simply CRACKED and split right along the whole length. This was right along the same lines as when the wife and laid our hickory hardwood floors....not pre-drilled...and c-r-a-c-k-! the whole length would split! (True enough, Carina at Little Raven gave me a prompt replacement).

OAK:. Doesn't seem to be as hard. More poruous and open grained. Made two for about 9bucks each though by tracing oak shelving (grade 1 board) and table-sawing/planing to finish. It however did NOT split along the lines, but rather slowly splintered away to an unsuitable condition..... splintered abit...we peel away the chip and re-sand it...splintered abit on occassion...repeat as often as necessary. In short, more of a true "waster" in that it wasted away. Both have lasted about the same time in service.

Now to offset each....the hickory one was more pricey being commercially made, while the oak ones were less pricey being mroe do it yourself.

Not to sound wishy-washy....but both have their pros and cons in my opinion. To my mind, the question becomes one of whether or not one is handy with woodworking and powertools. If so, maybe opt for cost and occassional woodwork....if not, go commercial and select a tighter-grained wood from a company that will stand behind their product when it fails....cuz it will.
Rod W. Thornton, Scholar Adept (Longsword)
ARMA-Virginia Beach Study Group


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.