What is a "Shortsword"

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Corey Roberts
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: Pyeongtaek, South Korea

What is a "Shortsword"

Postby Corey Roberts » Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:29 pm

What is the meaning of the word "Shortsword" does "Shortsword" mean a medieval single handed sword, being smaller than the "longsword" or does "Shortsword" mean something even smaller than a single hander?

User avatar
Richard Strey
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 8:59 am
Location: Cologne, Germany

Postby Richard Strey » Sat Aug 26, 2006 4:25 pm

It's always a question of context. Sometimes, modern people call a short sword a shortsword, a roman gladius for example. The period treatises of the German school I read usually just say "sword." It would appear that there was no systematic nomenclature back then and the reader knew what was meant anyway. To confuse things even more, halfswording was called "Schwert zu Kampf / Sword in Combat" or "Kurzes Schwert / Shortsword." :idea:

scottwegener
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: New Hampshire

Postby scottwegener » Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:24 pm

In my reading I've noticed that the term is very liquid. There is no real size at which a sword is short, long, or otherwise. Its one of those things taht's more a product of modern literature and RPGs than reality.

User avatar
Allen Johnson
Posts: 638
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 1:43 am
Location: Columbia, SC

Postby Allen Johnson » Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:20 am

George Silver called his weapon of choice a "shortsword". Its a basic baskethilt broadsword like this:

http://www.myarmoury.com/albums/display ... =15&pos=38

the blade is 33.5" - usually not what people today would consider "short"
"Why is there a picture of a man with a sword in his head on your desk?" -friends inquiry

scottwegener
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: New Hampshire

Postby scottwegener » Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:24 am

Allen Johnson wrote:George Silver called his weapon of choice a "shortsword". Its a basic baskethilt broadsword like this:

http://www.myarmoury.com/albums/display ... =15&pos=38

the blade is 33.5" - usually not what people today would consider "short"


Sure, and look at a katana. Its is the "long sword" of the Samurai paired swords, yet typical length is about the same -33 -36". At least the ones I've seen. But I've seen so-called short swords of the same length and so-called (again) long swords that dwarf them.

Maybe it would be more useful to think in terms of one- or two-handed swords? I'm certainly no expert and I'm just typing off the top of my head.

User avatar
Allen Johnson
Posts: 638
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 1:43 am
Location: Columbia, SC

Postby Allen Johnson » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:35 am

Richard Strey wrote:It's always a question of context. Sometimes, modern people call a short sword a shortsword, a roman gladius for example. The period treatises of the German school I read usually just say "sword." It would appear that there was no systematic nomenclature back then and the reader knew what was meant anyway. To confuse things even more, halfswording was called "Schwert zu Kampf / Sword in Combat" or "Kurzes Schwert / Shortsword." :idea:


And to confuse the term "half sword", later English masters used that term to define the point were opponents blades cross.
"Why is there a picture of a man with a sword in his head on your desk?" -friends inquiry

User avatar
J. F. McBrayer
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:55 am
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

Postby J. F. McBrayer » Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:18 am

Allen Johnson wrote:George Silver called his weapon of choice a "shortsword". Its a basic baskethilt broadsword like this:

http://www.myarmoury.com/albums/display ... =15&pos=38

the blade is 33.5" - usually not what people today would consider "short"


Indeed, following Silver's instructions for computing the perfect length for the short sword, you can easily end up with a 36" blade or thereabouts, depending on your height.

User avatar
J. F. McBrayer
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:55 am
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

Postby J. F. McBrayer » Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:22 am

Allen Johnson wrote:And to confuse the term "half sword", later English masters used that term to define the point were opponents blades cross.


Fiore and Vadi also used the term "mezza spada" (half sword) to mean an incrossada (engagement) at the middle of the sword. The term in Vadi for "halfswording" in the German sense is "mezza mella" (half blade), and in Fiore, I think it's something like false point or short point.


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.