Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
scott adair wrote:Thanks guys,
I hope to catch Jay in Houston next fall. I may try to get together with the DFW guys also.
scott adair wrote:I had to opportunity to do some unarmed against dagger work today with an old friend and a number of things came up in the process.
First there is a tremendous size difference. I am 5'7" and weigh 126#'s. My friend is 6'2" and weighs 210#'s.
I had been working on dagger techniques from Jay's book with Martin, my now relocated ARMA training partner, and we had been progressing fairly well and were able to make the techniques work at a about 75% speed. Martin is about my size.
Against the standard reverse grip stab the left hand interception and 'twist of the wrist disarm' illustrated on pages 62 and 63 of Jay's book worked every time at full speed.
'Single hand cover and stab' from page 78 and 'Armpit trap and disarm' (pg 79) worked fairly well at full speed.
We threw in a few left and right slashes to the face and against these I tried Fiore's Crown position. This is where things got really interesting. When my attacker threw what I consider to be a powerful slash (remember I'm small) I could usually stop it and counter with a hammer fist to the head. When he really put all of his weight and mass behind the blow his momentum would knock me off balance. I found that I was having to do a lot of passing and zoning to keep from getting clobbered. Especially when it was'nt just a single attack but he followed it with a charge to really press me and use his weight. Against the thrust from below we found the same thing. A simple step and thrust are one thing; a committed charge is a horse of a different color. Are we training reallisticly? Are we missing something? I want answers.
I don't want my knife training to be half @$$!
Scott Adair
Jay Vail wrote:As to sparring, you must be careful how you go about this. The techniques are intended to deal with the committed attack, and in most free play, the attacker does not make committed attacks. If you free play, the attacker must be very disciplined: he must make strong unexpected attacks, but they must be committed. Most training partners are unable to limit themselves in this way, and the play often degenerates into a form of touch fighting, with the attacker feinting, slashing, snap cutting and stabbing in jab-like motions. If he does this, you as the defender will be really hard pressed to defend yourself because unless the attack is committed, it is very hard to get hold of his arm.
Brian Hunt wrote:Hi Eric,
ever tried to cut through multple layers of linen and wool? Europeans clothing was made of layers of these type of fabrics, plus sometimes they were stuffed like a gambeson. More layers to get through to find flesh. Plus on the streets of America today when someone attacks you with a knife it will generally be a strongly commited attack. To the best of my knowledge, the mindset of sparring seems to be different than the mindset of an attack.
all the best.
Brian Hunt
GFS
Eric Dohner wrote:I don't mean to intrude on a discussion on a subject about which I'm not very knowledgeable, but is it possible that in the time the fechtbuchs were written knife attacks happened differently from those that happen today?
For some reason, might knife/dagger attacks have been more likely to be committed or overcommitted, for some cultural or psychological reason (the same thing, really)? Growing up on a farm, I've done a lot of "cutting uncooked flesh with sharp knives," and know that it doesn't take much commitment or time to do a lot of damage.
(Edit: I meant to specify that I'm suggesting knife attacks may have happened differently for reasons other than the design of the knives themselves.)
Return to “Unarmed Skills Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||