Shield thickness

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
JeanryChandler
Posts: 978
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 1:45 am
Location: New Orleans, aka northern Costa Rica
Contact:

Shield thickness

Postby JeanryChandler » Sat Sep 06, 2003 4:47 pm

The discussion of shield rims made me think of this.

In Johns Medieval combat book, he states that shields were typically (if I remember right) 1/2" - 1". I haven't been able to find any definitive data on medieval shields generally, but I do know that both Viking and Roman shields were very thin, from 1/5" to 3/8". I've tried the SCA types which are very thick and heavy (like up to 20 lbs!) and I've made some very light ones of 1/4" ply, and also of composites of two 1/8" door skins glued together (which is more like the original way they made them) and I found these to be, perhaps surprisingly, quite strong and sufficient, I even did some test cutting with an axe and a machete. I did notice that they held together much better with a rim, even a very light rim of extremely thin guage metal. On the other hand, I find the heavier SCA shields to be completely clumsy nearly un-usable, even the ones which aren't so notoriously huge, even their bucklers. I can't really wield them, and I'm pretty strong. All I could do was pretty much just hold them out there passively on my arm (and forget center grips with these things!)

Anyway, I wanted to know what the definitive data was on shields. How thick were medieval shields? How about bucklers? Did shields get thicker as a result of facing more bludgeoning weapons like hammers and maces?

JR
"We can't all be saints"
John Dillinger

Jay Vail
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 2:35 am

Re: Shield thickness

Postby Jay Vail » Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:36 am

Jean, I've tried shields of varying thickness as well. I made one of 3/8 plywood and it stood up to blows pretty well (ax and sword) and it was much easier on the carrying arm than the monster that SCA demands (1/2 in thick). The slightly thinner shield is more agile and seems to give good protection. A thickness of under 1/2 inch is consistent with the findings of many researchers. See for instance Siddorn, "Viking Weapons & Warfare," pp. 42-43, where he reports that the average thickness of surviving shield boards is .75 cm from the Anglo-Saxon era.


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.