conquest

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Eddie Smith
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:41 pm

conquest

Postby Eddie Smith » Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:51 pm

What is the general feeling about this show. I have thought some parts of a few episodes to be fairly well done, and others I thought were horrible, just wondering if anyone has any review/critiques of the show in general or of any episode.

User avatar
Shane Smith
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:15 pm
Location: Virginia Beach

Re: conquest

Postby Shane Smith » Sat Apr 12, 2003 11:04 am

My assessment is this; I enjoy the show as I do ANYTHING that spotlights medieval weaponry,but the absolute falsehood that is put forth as fact is astonishing to me.A couple of particularly troubling things I saw follow;
1.I saw an episode wherein guys in full plate were still bearing shields while fighting on foot.
2.These same guys were using longswords one-handed in conjunction with those shields while in full plate.
3.The guys are wearing non-tailored armor yet complaining about "how uncomfortable" it is to wear.
4.In one episode,the guys were fighting with an AXE against a sword and shield.The guy with the shield kept backing straight up from the host with the axe.The host presented this as evidence that the axe was unbeatable....I guess no-one thought to stifle the axe with the shield and cut with the sword?
5.There is an episode wherein the guys are fighting in full plate.No-one ever seeks to close and there is no hint of half-swording or any other historically-accurate techniques that I can recall.It looked like SCA fighting.

In closing,I think it's a fun show as long as you suspend your common sense and your analytical leanings. <img src="/forum/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" />

Edited to include a welcome to the forum! <img src="/forum/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />
Shane Smith~ARMA Forum Moderator
ARMA~VAB
Free Scholar

Guest

Re: conquest

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 13, 2003 2:19 pm

I don't like the show. Today they said that a rapier weights 30 pounds and have sharp edges!?!

Stuart McDermid
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 8:48 pm

Re: conquest

Postby Stuart McDermid » Sun Apr 13, 2003 9:53 pm

Err Tod,

This show does sound poor however I would like to know what makes you think that rapiers don't have sharp edges?

Where does this misconception come from?

The few antiques I have handled (4 to be precise) have been a very think diamond section at the cross but are just about flat in the last 6-8 inches of the blade. They are very sharp in the foible indeed.
Cheers,
Stu.

User avatar
Shane Smith
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:15 pm
Location: Virginia Beach

Re: conquest

Postby Shane Smith » Mon Apr 14, 2003 6:11 pm

I've see close-up photos of early-period rapiers that also seem to clearly show an edge of sorts.
Shane Smith~ARMA Forum Moderator

ARMA~VAB

Free Scholar


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.