ARMA Inducted into the World Martial Arts Union

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

Representing the entire historical fencing community, the ARMA now advises the Union on reviving and promoting authentic Western European fighting styles from the 14th to 17th centuries.
Says Clements: "My role in the WoMAU will be to represent the worldwide community of students and enthusiasts studying this craft. As an advocate promoting this subject, I will be acting to advise on modern efforts to revive the source teachings and consult on criteria for authentic practice. It is a responsibility I take seriously and will use to foster the integrity and standing of this craft. Chief among my goals will be preventing contamination of study by modern activities or its deterioration into mere sport."
Sal Bertucci wrote:Lastly, (and I admit this is a bit spiteful) if this is so irrelevant why did you both to take the time to come over and explain that everyone is in a tussle over it?
Hans Meier wrote:So, by means of an cloak-and-dagger operation (since nothing of the sort was announced or put out for discussion)
Jorge Cortines wrote:Hans,
I really don't understand your comments... I speak for myself not for the ARMA and this is my personal opinion:
*ARMA was invited to join the World Martial Arts Union
*Martial Arts of Renassaince Europe are now recognized as martial art, the ARMA made the case for our art to be an "Intangible Cultural Heritage". I think this is something to celebrate, don't you think?
*ARMA has made accessible to the public more articles, and manuals than any other group or association...
*ARMA focuses on researching and reviving the forgotten teachings of the historical Masters of Defence and fighting schools, we ARE NOT interested in sportifying the ART (tournaments)... sparring, freeplay for us IMO is a tool not a goal...
Now IMO, ARMA was invited for it's merits (+30 years of research and efforts in reviving these lost teachings, and preventing contamination from outside the sources, and demonstrating that the Art can be revived from source literature... all this again in +30 years of effort), we have not lost focus in our mission of researching and reviving the forgotten teachings of the historical Masters of Defence and fighting schools with trying to sportify the Art something in my humble opinion is happening, you see more and more rules for tournaments being discussed all over the internet, more and more focus on how, when, how many, what rules, what equipment for tournaments (for me sportifying), and less focus on scholarship... you see more and more focus on tournaments than in trying to revive the teachings as they were...
Again, what I see is ARMA made the homework and made it for the whole community in more than three decades... isn't this good?
Today MARE is an official "Intangible Cultural Heritage", something for the whole community to be proud...
*So ARMA was invited (because of it's trayectory in many decades of effort)
*ARMA in +30 years of effort was able to promote Martial Arts of Renassaince Europe as a official "Intangible Cultural Heritage" and this effort was made for the whole community, now what you do and the other groups in Europe (and in America, Africa, Asia, that study MARE) do is an "Intangible Cultural Heritage", and an official martial art (how can you be angry with this?)
*If you wish to know what we do, ARMA does do open seminars you can contact JC, it is on the website, we have an open forum for discussion, we share source material, we share articles, videos, photos
*There is no restriction written or not that prevent us from going to participating outside, we are just not interested in sportifying the Art (we do see IMO all this tournament with rules as sportifying the Art)
So please explain why having promoted MARE to an "Intangible Cultural Heritage" is such a bad thing? why promoting MARE is such a bad thing? why doing this things for the whole community (ARMA in it) is bad?
Jonathan Hill wrote:This is true, and to understand how the Europeans feel you need to look at it from a prospective of being ‘outside ARMA.’ What is kind of an obvious thing that occurs to the Europeans is that ARMA, which may be international, is an organization originated and largely based in the US and has been selected to represent the martial arts of Europe. This is similar to a US based Karate organization being selected to represent the martial arts of Japan, or a Peruvian organization selected to represent the martial arts of Mexico. This can be offensive to the groups in Europe who are working on their own arts.
Jonathan Hill wrote:This is true, and to understand how the Europeans feel you need to look at it from a prospective of being ‘outside ARMA.’ What is kind of an obvious thing that occurs to the Europeans is that ARMA, which may be international, is an organization originated and largely based in the US and has been selected to represent the martial arts of Europe. This is similar to a US based Karate organization being selected to represent the martial arts of Japan, or a Peruvian organization selected to represent the martial arts of Mexico. This can be offensive to the groups in Europe who are working on their own arts.
Jorge Cortines wrote:I still don't understand. By this way of thinking:
the Greeks should be offended because a German was the main researcher that made excavations in Mycene and found a golden mask that we call the Mask of Agamemnon, a British was the main reasearcher and made excavations and reconstructed partially the palace of Knossoss, and Turks should be offended too because it was the same German (and then came a British) that made excavations in Mycene and establish that the ruins were Troy and Mexicans should be very much offended, because Italians, British, Germans, French were senior researchers at Mayan ruins, and a Russian woman decifer the Mayan codices...
This is a strange (for lack of vocabulary) way of thinking, IMO.
Should the world throw out the window the research of the Maya so many Europeans in America made because they were not born in America? Does the Europeans that still research the Maya in Mexico and Central America lack validity (or are unfit) in their work or should be prohibited that they continue studying/researching in America because they are stationed/born at Europe?
This is a very very strange way of thinking for a XXI century modern man... IMO
Then why again should "Europeans" (sorry for the generalization, but that is the way that has been expressed in the thread, I know it is not all Europeans) feel offended that today Martial Arts of Renassaince Europe is considered a "Intangible Cultural Heritage" for the World and is now a recognized Martial Art?
???? JC has spearheaded the promotion of Martial Arts of Renassaince Europe since three decades ago... he's done tons of research, network with the academia (academic and technical consultants) published material, made accessible source literature, trained, be critic about contaminating the Art, demostrated that the Art can be reconstructed from source literature... he was invited because of this
merits I think...
Now IMO, ARMA was invited for it's merits (+30 years of research and efforts in reviving these lost teachings, and preventing contamination from outside the sources, and demonstrating that the Art can be revived from source literature...
*ARMA focuses on researching and reviving the forgotten teachings of the historical Masters of Defence and fighting schools, we ARE NOT interested in sportifying the ART (tournaments)... sparring, freeplay for us IMO is a tool not a goal...
So please explain why having promoted MARE to an "Intangible Cultural Heritage" is such a bad thing? why promoting MARE is such a bad thing? why doing this things for the whole community (ARMA in it) is bad?
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||