The Wikipedia

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Mike Chidester
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 1:27 pm
Location: Provo, Utah
Contact:

The Wikipedia

Postby Mike Chidester » Sun Dec 12, 2004 6:31 pm

I'm curious if anyone has been considering contributions to the Wikipedia on the topic of european martial arts. Looking through the various articles on the masters, the techniques, and martial arts in general, most are overly brief, incomplete, and/or innaccurate.

I personally don't know enough about these topics to outdo the people who have posted already, but many on these forums certainly do. Heck, most of the articles posted on the site would be great as articles.

For those not familiar with the Wikipedia, info can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About

It's essentially an open-access online encyclopedia whose entries consist entirely of submissions from readers. Anyone can submit and anyone can edit articles. The concept behind wikis is that with the amount of traffic that such pages recieve, people with knowledge on any topic will be able to review such articles, identify errors and misinformation, and correct it. In this way, the whole wiki (in this case, the encyclopedia) will be refined with every post. Meaning that if you think that the article of Liechtenhauer is inadequite, you can edit it or change it completely. And anyone else passing through can correct any errors in yours.

Anyway, just thought I'd bring this up since I doubt most members were aware of it. It's a good chance to clear up a lot of misconceptions about our art, since Wikipedia has enormous traffic. (Though the articles posted thus far aren't terrible, as such things go--they're just not complete.)
Michael Chidester
General Free Scholar
ARMA Provo

"I have met a hundred men who would call themselves Masters, and taking all of their skill together they have not the makings of three good Scholars, let alone one Master."

User avatar
Ryan Ricks
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 10:15 am
Location: marietta, GA

Re: The Wikipedia

Postby Ryan Ricks » Sun Dec 12, 2004 10:25 pm

hugh long was working on a project of that sort, although he was concentrating on sword terms. i don't think the project got very far since everyone involved was pretty busy

ryan
ARMA associate member

User avatar
KatherineJohnson
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: The Wikipedia

Postby KatherineJohnson » Sun Dec 12, 2004 11:37 pm

Quaintly enough, Wikipedia says that "longsword" is a non historical term...
Vae Victus

User avatar
James_Knowles
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 7:15 pm
Location: Utah, USA

Re: The Wikipedia

Postby James_Knowles » Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:49 am

I've helped Hugh and crew out on this. We have a Yahoo group set up (I'll have to look it up); it's been quiet for some time. It'd be nice to have some additional help.
James Knowles
ARMA Provo, UT

User avatar
James_Knowles
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 7:15 pm
Location: Utah, USA

Re: The Wikipedia

Postby James_Knowles » Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:52 am

Wikipedia says that "longsword" is a non historical term
What? Where? That needs to be corrected.
James Knowles

ARMA Provo, UT

User avatar
KatherineJohnson
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: The Wikipedia

Postby KatherineJohnson » Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:55 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sword

Under types of swords.
Vae Victus

User avatar
Scott Anderson
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Price, UT

Re: The Wikipedia

Postby Scott Anderson » Tue Dec 14, 2004 3:59 am

I read somewhere that wikipedia is the internets largest source of misinformation primarily due to peoples being able to alter the information contained in it. Those that do know something that post about it tend to get the information quickly altered by those who don't really know who insist that the false information they believe to be true who tend to overwhelm those who do know.

SPA.
perpetually broke but hopefully soon to have money to join.

User avatar
James_Knowles
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 7:15 pm
Location: Utah, USA

Re: The Wikipedia

Postby James_Knowles » Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:39 am

wikipedia is the internets largest source of misinformation

No kidding. I've run into that problem before on other topics.

I just read the entry on longsword and became rather unhappy.

This BS about longsword being a "non-historical" term is rather new -- just in the last months. I don't remember seeing it when I added some entries to wiki earlier this year. The drivel in "longsword" is rather painful.

The lack of quality control is rather disturbing. A better place may be a privately-owned website.
James Knowles

ARMA Provo, UT


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests

cron

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.