unofficial sword reviews

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
scott adair
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 6:49 am
Location: Lubbock, TX

unofficial sword reviews

Postby scott adair » Tue Nov 19, 2002 5:14 pm

I have been contemplating purchasing a sword for some time now but anytime I see something I like I do not know anything about that particular blade. Construction horror stories and the fact that I like to be able to actually hold something before I buy it have prevented me from making a purchase.

The other day I noticed in a thread that Jake Norwood had used an mrl Albrect the II sword so I emailed him for feedback. Thanks again for the info Jake. As it is not ARMA's policy to review or endorse particular swords or makers I thought it might be helpful if people made a list of swords they had handled in their profiles. An even better Idea might be a page devoted to this as there are quite a large number of people who post on the forum and going through all profiles would take some time. With a devoted page one could scroll down and find people with experience with the sword of interest and email them privately.

Anyway, with that out of the way, has anyone handled the "war sword" from Albion? It is a del tin blade with the hilt assembled by albion. The number is adt 5143.

Has anyone handled the "hastings" model norman sword?


,Scott Adair

User avatar
GaryGrzybek
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 9:30 am
Location: Stillwater, New Jersey
Contact:

Re: unofficial sword reviews

Postby GaryGrzybek » Wed Nov 20, 2002 10:00 am

Hopefully we'll have some reviews up on the northeast site soon. Right now there's only pictures.
Gary

G.F.S.
ARMA Northern N.J.
Albion Armorers Collectors Guild

User avatar
David Kite
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 10:34 am
Location: Terre Haute, IN USA

Re: unofficial sword reviews

Postby David Kite » Wed Nov 20, 2002 7:11 pm

I've got a Lutel longsword #15019. I think the model number is fairly irrelevant, though, because the specs on their blades are all the same, the only differences being the number of fullers (if any) and of course the hilt. Incidently, since the blade of my model isn't pictured on the site, it has one fuller extending one-half the blade, and roughly one-third as wide.

David Kite

Guest

Re: unofficial sword reviews

Postby Guest » Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:14 am

Since we talk about reviews, tell me more about your Lutel longsword, cause I'm getting the same type in a couple of months. I have a two Lutel daggers wich are great.

User avatar
David Kite
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 10:34 am
Location: Terre Haute, IN USA

Re: unofficial sword reviews

Postby David Kite » Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:59 pm

disclaimer: this is my first steel sword, so just because I'm impressed, take it with a grain of salt!

length: overall; 46 3/4" blade; 36 1/4" grip (not including pommel); 7"
crossguard length: 10 1/4"
blade width: at cross; 1 3/4" before tip; 7/8" tapers gently
distal taper: yes, but in the absence of calipers, I've no idea how much. tapers gently. Also has a 1 1/2" "ricasso"
weight: overall: 3 3/4 lbs. pommel: 1 lb. (is that normal?)
COB: roughly 4" from guard
COP: don't know

impression: Being as it is my first sword, I like the feel of it. It seems to maneuver quickly, especially considering the slightly excessive weight but, as the weight and feel is SO much different than my wasters, I also haven't yet developed the proper strength or technique to properly evaluate its handling. When swung forcibly, the sword doesn't try to haul me along behind it. I also recommend wearing gloves when handling it, because the design of the cross makes it rub against my knuckles, which becomes very uncomfortabe very quickly.

Lutel's swords are normally not sharpened, but I requested mine to be sharp. While sharper than Lutel swords may normally be, I don't think mine is as sharp as it should be. Unless my technique is really just that awful, it couldn't even cut a water-filled coke bottle. But that problem is pretty easy to fix.
However, the pommel is of course the screw-on type, and after a couple of attempts to hew a cardboard corner (from home-appliance packaging), the handguard loosened up, caused by the loosening pommel. Another problem easily fixed, but still somewhat annoying. I don't believe there is a danger of the pommel falling off and the blade flying away, because it seems to take an excessive number of twists to remove the pommel.

Slapping the blade or the pommel does seem to cause a fairly intense wobbling, but when the point is pressed against something, it does not flex very far (maybe four inches away from "true"), and it returns to true immediately. It does reverberate for a considerable time (longer than I would have thought), and when tapped gently, rings like a tuning fork.

The handle grip and scabbard seem well-made with good quality leather, and the scabbard has metal fittings at the mouth and tip. The finish of the blade and furniture is very smooth with a visible grain (I suppose what is called "satin").

When the weather allows me to meet up with my group again, and I can see how sharp a sword should be, I'll sharpen my sword up and do some test cutting, hopefully before hell (or at least Indiana) freezes over. I'll edit this post to reflect those results. Since the tang has a screw-threaded rod welded to it, I hope the tang is strong enough to withstand test cutting. Cross your fingers.

Overall, I am very pleased with the sword, and have no real complaints. While it may or may not compare to more expensive blades, I feel it is definitely a good starter sword and "learner piece."
Also, sorry if any of the above is completely irrelevant.

David Kite


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.