I can never find a chance to use the wechselhau, though.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Describe what you think the Wechselhau is, and I'll tell you what I think it is (at least according to Meyer), and we'll see what we can do. It's a vorschlag, after all.
Isn't the wechselhau just changing from one side to another by rotating either an ober or unter hau? Like in Talhoffer's 1467 manual(I think it's the second template in his longsword section, not sure, though).
What I mean by not being able to use that tactic is that my opponent can keep up such an assault that I can't seem to get a strike in unless he overextends himself by moving his body before his sword. He usually does, which is why I can defeat him half the time, but the other half, he just keeps pummeling me with such force that I get exhausted from getting slammed into so hard.
I have a really hard time using the Schiller with the larger and heavier claymore when compared to my bastard-sword.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's probably because we're talking about different strikes. I've got a video of what I *believe* is definitive schiller, fulfilling all the requirements and only requiring a slight change from what most of us have been doing. It's lightining fast, too. Remember, I'm a looong-sword guy. A greatsword guy. And it's fast. (Right, Stew?). We'll get you squared away.
I believe that the Schiller is an oberhau that starts Vom Dach and ultimately ends up in an Ochs of the opposite side, thus one "squints" down one side of his blade to see his enemy. It works real well for me in longsword fencing, but with a true Renaissance two-hander like the 15th century Claymore, it doesn't happen quite as quickly, and since my opponent's two-hander is longer to be more compatible with his size and weight, he can usually wechsel from the strike and withdraw to the opposite side before I thrust or schnitt towards his jugular(in theory). I would like to see this video of which you speak. Sounds like it can help.
Zwerch works, although not quick enough to stifle his attack completly, so it usually leads to winden or mutieren.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, but this is why the zwerch works. The bind is one of the strengths of the zwerch. In fact, the whole "gist" of the german "system" is that every attack needs to have a number of "outs," indes. Those are (1) a successful strike, (2) a bind followed by a thrust when he's soft at the sword, (3) a displacement or twitch (zucken) when he's hard at the bind (this includes grappling). Dobringer calls the zwerch the queen of all strikes, and I think this is why. It does these things better than any other, although I believe that EVERY strike in the german "system" requires this kind of pre-planning or thinking ahead.
Meyer (like Musashi), says that single combat and mass combat are the same, both for the fighter on the ground and for the General leading the battle. It's the Chess-like thinking ahead 2 or 3 moves that largely defines this.
You are preaching to the choir on this one. <img src="/forum/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" /> The Zwerch is definently one of the best moves in my arsenal of attacks because of the options it gives one from ambinden, though I still prefer to hit the head before the sword in the hopes of ending the fight a lot faster. Zwerch even proves it's effectiveness against another Zwerch launched by the adversary! When he tries to Zwerch from the bind, I found out that is a good time to either pull off the hand drucken or durchlauffen to grapple or disarm. When he gets in close, he has no chance, because he knows virtually no defense against my grappling techniques, which is why he insists on throwing a hailstrom of heavy blows my way to keep me back as far as possible before he kills me.
I told him to do his homework and read what Hanko Doebringer has to say about playfighters who "invent" their own strikes and guards that are clearly derived from the Liechtenaur system.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But remember, he's not likely to believe you unless you can show him in the fight that what he's doing doesn't work...and it sounds like you're struggling there.
As for how to beat that...are his arms crossed or open? If it's ochs-like (which Einhorn is), try attacking to the elbows with an exended krump, and be prepared for actions at the bind.
His "Schranckhut" that he thinks he came up with looks like the one from Talhoffer's template 23 in the 1467 publication. I can beat him from that particular guard if I'm close enough to thrust from the Ochs on the opposite side, but otherwise he'll unwind his hands and strike before I close in.
As for his Einhorn, I have tried to Krump towards the exposed elbow, but he quickly drops his blade down to Schranck and does a duplieren. I am fast enough to withdraw before he can hit, but I'm still trying to figure out how to counter the duplieren.
BTW, your advice given is much appreciated. I thank you in advance as you continue to help me with a rather difficult buffalo opponent with the twohander as you did when I needed help with the hand-and-a-half.
Justin

