I had an interesting experience this past few weeks reguarding a claim by a sword collector that he has witnessed many weld marks on baskethilt weapons from the 16th-19th centuries holding the tang to the blade. Knowing what we do about "rat tail" tangs I found this claim to be near sacreligious. Also combined with the fact that I had never heard anything like this before and had personally looked at hundreds and hundreds of pictures of my favorite weapon of all time.
We all at some point have had views that we hold, challenged or questioned by others. It would have been quite easy for me to say the claim was BS, cause I've never encountered it and move on. But I decided to give it a chance and did some more research. Long story short, I found out that this claim is supported and, to me, proven by a few others.
This big picture is that, I think often times we are too quick to discount new ideas that may arise in the sword community because the source is someone or something unknown to us. I'm certainly not saying that we should accept everything that is offered- but if we are going to call something as suprious, know WHY is it so. Not just because it came from this guy or this other club. We often get frustrated with others for not accepting facts that are so plain when the research is looked at fairly and unbaisedly (is that a word?). For me, this was a good lesson in making sure that I'm not doing the same thing.
PS- If any one is really interested in the actual topic of these tang welds, let me know and I'll be happy to share and give the sources propper credit.
