Interesting training refrence

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Aaron Pynenberg
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 3:47 am
Location: Appleton WI

Interesting training refrence

Postby Aaron Pynenberg » Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:07 pm

Hello Everyone,

I am reading the book: The Oxford Illustrated History Of The Crusades by Jonathan Riley-Smith. Chap 10, pg 241 2nd paragraph reads:

"The young Mamluks in the Cairo Citadel embarked on a punishing schedule of military training. They were made to slice at lumps of clay with thier swords as many as 1000 times a day so as to build thier arm muscles."

There is no mention of where this info comes from, but I find it very interesting. Has anyone used clay as a medium to do any test cutting yet? I would imagine that it is a very good material in that it is probably cheap, mimicks body denisty and would perserve the steel of your sword as well.

Any thoughts out there?
"Because I Like It"

User avatar
Derek Gulas
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:04 pm
Location: Washington USA

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Derek Gulas » Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:44 pm

It sounds like it's a really good idea. The clay wouldn't mind being cut. You could reform it multiple times and it would be cheap. Wouldn't it dull your sword easily though? And how close is it really to flesh?

Oh yeah, and be sure to check for pebbles <img src="/forum/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" />
Close combat - bringing us together.

Derek
ARMA, Seattle

User avatar
John_Clements
Posts: 1167
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2002 10:43 pm
Location: Atlanta area

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby John_Clements » Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:24 am

A 15th century Persian military text (or "Furisaya") shows an image of this kind of exercise being performed. Sounds good to me. A small problem is sediment in the clay will scratch up the blade some.

JC
Do NOT send me private messages via Forum messenger. I NEVER read them. To contact me please use direct email instead.

User avatar
Shane Smith
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:15 pm
Location: Virginia Beach

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Shane Smith » Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:13 pm

I'm guessing your sharp wouldn't be for long. Abrasives can sharpen a blade just as the solids in clay can surely dull one. Do you suppose these guys used sharps and simply resharpened them at the end of certain number of blows or did they have training weapons as we do. Surely blades were still expensive enough that the common fighting man couldn't afford a blunt and sharp? I really don't know...just thinking out loud...
Shane Smith~ARMA Forum Moderator
ARMA~VAB
Free Scholar

User avatar
Derek Gulas
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:04 pm
Location: Washington USA

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Derek Gulas » Sat Jun 03, 2006 1:50 pm

Maybe they only had one sword but sharpened it before battle.

Also, why not take swords from fallen enemies after battle to use?
Close combat - bringing us together.



Derek

ARMA, Seattle

User avatar
Jeffrey Hull
Posts: 678
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:40 pm
Location: USA

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Jeffrey Hull » Sat Jun 03, 2006 6:36 pm

Right - why not use the clay for cutting with different goals with different swords?

- With a sharp one to test your ability at making the range of cuts as best you can (after which you may need to sharpen the thing a little).

- With a blunter one for extensive repetitious workout, perhaps as described in that passage.
JLH

*Wehrlos ist ehrlos*

Zach Palfreyman
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:37 am
Location: Springville, UT

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Zach Palfreyman » Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:39 am

As far as the cost of a sword, I don't really know either. But I would have serious doubts that they couldn't afford an extra practice sword. Even if it /was/ costly, that is simply the price for making war. I mean could you imagine the US Army not having target practice to save money on ammo, or fighter pilots being grounded all the time b/c the price of gas? Also if swords were so much, why would they go into debt just for the one sword. They'd just train in some cheaper weapon like spear, staff, mace, or club.

But the more relevent question might be if clay is a good cutting target and how affordable/usable it is for us modern swordplay as a hobby practitioners.

User avatar
Kyro_Lantsberger
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 11:51 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Kyro_Lantsberger » Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:19 am

I find this very interesting. What are all your thoughts comparing this to modern ballistic gelatin used to study performance of different rounds?

Ballistic gelatin is a very specialized substance. Is it possible that "Cutting Clay" was likewise made as a very unique substance vs. clay for construction for the very reasons mentioned - abrasives, and the preservation of blades?

Granted, I just thought of this now, but I think since this is only mentioned (at this point) in Egypt and Persia, I think it would be worth considering the possibility that the soils/geology of the area allowed for the production of a sword-friendly cutting medium.

User avatar
Stacy Clifford
Posts: 1126
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Stacy Clifford » Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:36 am

Clay straight out of the ground in most cases would present sediment problems like stray grains of sand, but a good block of modeling clay is usually very homogeneous and free of contaminants. Clay minerals themselves are soft and not especially abrasive, and the actual grains are microscopic and plate-shaped, which is why they settle together so tightly and make clay so dense. Overall with a clean block of refined clay I wouldn't think it should be any worse for your sword than cutting wet newspaper (with the tiny grains of titanium oxide that make paper white).

~Stacy Clifford, ex-geologist
0==[>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Stacy Clifford
Free-Scholar
ARMA Houston, TX

User avatar
Kyro_Lantsberger
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 11:51 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Kyro_Lantsberger » Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:37 am

.....or, the possibility that this training may have been somewhat similar to Dussack.......a wooden training weapon used for training purposes.

Thus, a training regimen could be produced that gave realistic feedback to blade alignment, plus some resistance training, and a recycleable cutting medium. I dont know clay very well, but could the softness be altered with water to create different levels of resistance? With the addition of armours over clay forms, I think a very high level regimen of combat training could be created.

Ive never done any cutting practice, but it is something that intrigues me. I watched the SCHOLA "First Cut is the Deepest" cutting video on the internet, and I would swear that those guys must have hijacked a produce truck to make that possible. A claylike cutting medium which could be re-formed and reused would make that type of training cleaner, quicker, and likely more "fruitful". :-)
Very interesting idea.

User avatar
Jeffrey Hull
Posts: 678
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:40 pm
Location: USA

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Jeffrey Hull » Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:11 pm

Like Stacy said, a refined clay for artistic ceramics would be very fine and not really abraisive to metal, I would think especially the cheap orange-red pottery clays would be dense enough for nice resistance but would not hurt a blade. You can get sacks of that stuff that you can mix with water and so forth, make all you want. You could even mold it into the head of an orc or whatever you like. <img src="/forum/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" />
JLH



*Wehrlos ist ehrlos*

User avatar
Aaron Pynenberg
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 3:47 am
Location: Appleton WI

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Aaron Pynenberg » Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:31 pm

Kyro- ballistic gellatin-that was exactly what I was thinking when I came across this in the book. I have been doing some calling around and so far I am having pretty good luck with lanscaping places and also at mines. We have a few here in Wisconsin that are producing aggregate rock and they are in most cases developing a fair amount of clay as well.

I have not followed up yet and retrieved any samples, but you and I are thinking along the same lines. The amount of water in the clay probably changes it's make-up and I would guess you could make it as "dense" or "loose" as you wanted. -now the big ? is how to stack it and form it, how to place it on a stand and store it etc...I'll be doing some more on all this soon- later, AP
"Because I Like It"

User avatar
JeffGentry
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Columbus Ohio

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby JeffGentry » Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:27 pm

I was even thinking about modeling clay you can get that at a hobby store i would imagine., i think i'll check about the reddish pottery clay.

Jeff
Semper Fidelis

Usque ad Finem

Grace, Focus, Fluidity

User avatar
ElizabethPangerl
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 3:18 pm
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby ElizabethPangerl » Fri Jun 09, 2006 7:37 am

I've used ballistics gelatin and I think clay would be entirely different - more resistant, etc. and very useful.

3 things to note about clay
1. If they could get clay for their dishes and houses, they could use it for their training.
2. Clay is found in riverbanks and valleys where it is deposited by slow-moving water, and they'd have access to that.
3. The term "clay" refers to a particle size/texture as well as a class of silicate minerals of varying composition.
(another ex-geologist)
Elizabeth Pangerl
ARMA - Twin Cities (Minnesota)

User avatar
Stacy Clifford
Posts: 1126
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: Interesting training refrence

Postby Stacy Clifford » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:24 pm

Good point on #3. Proper clay minerals are soft, but microfine quartz grains are still going to be abrasive. However, in most floodplains I believe it's going to be real, soft, slippery when wet clay. The important thing is to have a uniform texture with the larger, harder grains of different materials that would damage the blade filtered out. That does happen naturally often enough, but for us modeling or pottery clay guarantees better quality control I think. Geology rocks. <img src="/forum/images/icons/grin.gif" alt="" />
0==[>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Stacy Clifford
Free-Scholar
ARMA Houston, TX


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.