Good buy, or junk???

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

Justin Copeland
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 3:11 pm
Location: Salina, KS

Good buy, or junk???

Postby Justin Copeland » Sat Sep 30, 2006 10:22 am

I am looking to buy my first waster, and I came across the one in the link below. Could anyone tell me if it is a good, practical practice weapon, or, if not, where I could find one???

Thank you

http://www.museumreplicas.com/webstore/ ... _hand.aspx
~J.F.C.~

User avatar
Jaron Bernstein
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:58 am

Re: Good buy, or junk???

Postby Jaron Bernstein » Sat Sep 30, 2006 11:02 am

Justin Copeland wrote:I am looking to buy my first waster, and I came across the one in the link below. Could anyone tell me if it is a good, practical practice weapon, or, if not, where I could find one???

Thank you

http://www.museumreplicas.com/webstore/ ... _hand.aspx


I would go with a New Stirling Arms or Raven.

User avatar
Neil Bockus
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 2:00 pm
Location: New York

Postby Neil Bockus » Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:09 pm

In my own experience, the MRL wasters haven't been of very high quality. I've had two split their crossguards on me under pretty light training situations. Trying to repair with woodglue added weight and threw the balance off, so I'd be weary of that particular line of wasters.
Oh thank God! Some sorta...rescue...toaster!

User avatar
s_taillebois
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:29 pm
Location: Colorado

Postby s_taillebois » Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:36 pm

The cross on MRL is just pinned together with dowels. So these will tend to work loose. The pommel, is just glued onto a flat joint, without a dowel or other jointing.
The wood on the 'blade', sometimes a bit weak. So if need to use these, wrapping the blade, and around the crossing with some canvas helps the longevity.
MRL wasters, the main advantage, or the only one, is that their wasters are easy to get without too long of a delay. And if it's stolen upon delivery, not losing much.
MRL does make some good items, the wasters aren't really amongst them.
Steven Taillebois

User avatar
Doug Marnick
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 7:06 pm
Location: Staten Island, NY

Postby Doug Marnick » Sat Sep 30, 2006 3:25 pm

Justin,
I own this waster, although mine is not two-tone. I am very disappointed for three reasons.
1. Weight. It is way too light at 1lb 4 oz. I don't feel like I'm getting the best workout I can when practicing cuts. The lack of "heftiness" also makes a difference for me in bind/wind practice. Believe it or not, one pound makes a difference.
2. Soft Wood. Although this sounds like a problem for Viagra to solve, I know very little about wood quality/types. What I do know is this waster, if bumped into with a car key, will dent. Repeated contact with a quality waster will soon leave you with scalloped edges. BTW, I like how the ad says it can withstand abuse "even edge to edge". LOL
3. Durability. As stated by the above posts, this thing is fragile. I had to repair the crossguard on this piece as well as its companion short sword after little use. Oberhau + Kron = Half a crossguard remaining. This not even with sparring, this is from drills.
Overall, it depends on budget, as it did for me when I saw these Windlass Steelcraft wasters on eBay. Not only do I recommend spending the cash on a high quality waster, I advise not wasting your money on 4 feet of regret.
Hope this helps.
Doug Marnick
NYC

"The sword was a weapon of grace, nobility, and honor... which was little comfort as you slowly bled to death in a dung-filled moat."


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.