Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
Michael Olsen wrote:That is a trial-by-combat between a man and a woman.
From what I read in a book (wish I still had it handy):
The man was put in a hole waist deep and given the club you see there.
The woman was given a rock to put in her sash, which as then tied off.
The man "won" if he got the woman into the hole
The woman "won" if she got the man out of the hole
Again, I wish I still had easy access to the text - that is all I remember. I don't recall their relationship (I would imagine husband and wife), nor the cause for the trial (dispute?). Anyone with more specific information, please enlighten us.
Edit: I believe the text I read this from was Mark Rector's Medieval Combat: A Fifteenth-Century Illustrated Manual of Swordfighting and Close-Quarter Combat, Green Hill Books, 2000.
Craig Peters wrote:In plate 77 recto it appears that the combatant on the left has thrown his hat as a method of distracting his opponent- does the German text indicate this?
http://base.kb.dk/pls/hsk_web/hsk_vis.side?p_hs_loebenr=2&p_sidenr=157&p_illnr=0&p_frem=20&p_tilbage=4&p_navtype=rel&p_lang=eng
Will Adamson wrote:I don't think this was meant as a specific episode but rather an illustration of possible techniques that the nobleman could teach to a subject who was going to be involved in one of these judicial combats.
Michael Olsen wrote:Will Adamson wrote:I don't think this was meant as a specific episode but rather an illustration of possible techniques that the nobleman could teach to a subject who was going to be involved in one of these judicial combats.
Right. I was trying to respond in generalities: my impression from the book was that this use of the hole, choice of weapons, and goals of combat was a standard or at least common format of a man/woman dispute. I didn't mean to say that it was a single recorded event, but was trying to present the general circumstances surrounding such occasions.
I was and am still curious as to the "cause for fighting" that may lead to a dispute like this though, and I think that portion of my post may have been poorly phrased.
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||