Spear systems?

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Sam Nankivell
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:20 pm
Location: Beijing, China.

Spear systems?

Postby Sam Nankivell » Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:47 pm

Does anyone know of any spear systems in WMA? Not just side-notes to sword systems, but full spear systems.

Stewart Sackett
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:46 am
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Stewart Sackett » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:58 pm

I don’t’ know that it’s really fair or accurate to talk about medieval & Renaissance weapon sets as distinct ‘systems’.

David Welch had good post describing the nature of HEMA & their likely training methods. He said:

“In modern combatatives, several of the top people are starting to outline their teaching strategies into terms of "hardware" and "software". This increases the ability to teach different things quickly, by decreasing the amount of different things you have to learn. One of the key parts to this is the ability to figure out similarities in use between weapons.

There is no doubt at all the old masters did this. For example, if someone learns half-swording he already has a good grounding in the use of a poll axe. All he has to do is make adjustment for the difference in hardware, but the same software runs both tools. In another example, Meyer says you do unarmed striking from what you learn in dagger... you just stab without holding a dagger. Both have the same basic software.”



“I believe the hardware/software idea is consistent throughout WMA. I have yet to see anything that looks like they tried to reinvent the wheel when they could just substitute a similar technique.”

The weapons were trained in a single, unified, system. If one weapon (the longsword) got more attention then others (such as the spear) it’s seems likely that this was because the former was the most versatile weapon.

User avatar
Sam Nankivell
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:20 pm
Location: Beijing, China.

Postby Sam Nankivell » Sat Mar 03, 2007 6:58 pm

Good point. So what "software" would be best for learning how to use a spear?

I just don't get why there is so little written about the weapon when it was an extremely common weapon. Shouldn't there be more to it's technique than simply poking like mad.

User avatar
Martin Wallgren
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 1:11 am
Location: Bjästa, Ö-vik, Sweden
Contact:

Postby Martin Wallgren » Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:02 pm

You could possibly find alot useful in the Poleaxe techniques of several of the masters, and some of the halfswording techniques. The there is staff stuff you could try. As for manuals I don´t recall seeing any "only-spears" sections.
Martin Wallgren, MnHFS

User avatar
J. F. McBrayer
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:55 am
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

Postby J. F. McBrayer » Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm

Martin Wallgren wrote:You could possibly find alot useful in the Poleaxe techniques of several of the masters, and some of the halfswording techniques. The there is staff stuff you could try. As for manuals I don´t recall seeing any "only-spears" sections.


Fiore includes a section on spear on foot. See the Eleonora Litta and Matt Easton translation of the Getty Fior di Battaglia. The pictures are broken right now, but they're from the Novati anyway, which you should be able to find easily for yourself.

Vadi's section on spear is very short, but I suspect that's because when he gets to it, he's just shown aza and spada in arme, and the spear is pretty much the same.

I agree with Stewart Sackett quoting David Welch above. Fiore did not teach a sword system with side notes for other weapons, but a complete, consistent, and unified system for all weapons, in armour, and without. This is why, IMO, it's important to study not just the techniques shown by a particular master, but also to study according to their pedagogy, in as much as that's available to us.
Liberté, egalité, fraternité!

User avatar
Mike Cartier
Posts: 594
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 12:21 pm
Location: USA Florida

Postby Mike Cartier » Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:24 am

i would personally consider meyers polearms to be Staff/ Halberd and Pike

The staff i have always considered staff/spear as it is a very point oriented staff perfectly suite to spear.
Mike Cartier
Meyer Frei Fechter
www.freifechter.com

User avatar
Jon Pellett
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:15 pm
Location: Calgary, AB

Re: Spear systems?

Postby Jon Pellett » Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:23 am

Sam Nankivell wrote:Does anyone know of any spear systems in WMA? Not just side-notes to sword systems, but full spear systems.


I can't think of any where the spear is the only or central weapon, but that doesn't mean they aren't full systems, even if the sword is the exemplar.

Was the short spear really such a dominant weapon by the Renaissance era? It was still around, but as a niche weapon together with the pike, lance, and various polearms (or am I mistaken)?

There's lots of spear-like polearm sources. I second Mike regarding Meyer's staff, it seems perfect for spear. There's also Silver and Swetnam for staff. For partisan (very spear-like), long spear/pike/lance, and spiedo (winged spear) there are Marozzo, Manciolino, and DiGrassi. Marozzo and Manciolino also have partisan and rotella (= spear and shield), which is cool. And there's the spear in Ringeck, Talhoffer and whatnot if you want to get all medieval.

Cheers

User avatar
Brian Hunt
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 2:03 am
Location: Price, Utah
Contact:

Postby Brian Hunt » Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:20 pm

Paulus Hector Mair has an extesive section on both short staff and long staff. These easily transfer over to spear and lance since they are very point oriented. Plus in the instances where he discusses spears, javelins and lances the techniques he shows with them are no different that those shown with the staff.

all the best.

Brian Hunt
GFS

http://www.paulushectormair.com
Tuus matar hamsterius est, et tuus pater buca sabucorum fundor!

http://www.paulushectormair.com
http://www.emerytelcom.net/users/blhunt/sales.htm

LafayetteCCurtis
Posts: 421
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:00 pm

Postby LafayetteCCurtis » Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:16 am

And then there'd be a difference between single combat techniques, which are likely to have been more refined and certainly more likely to get into the manuals, as opposed to massed battlefield techniques that probably got around more by oral channels than by organized schools. At least unti lthe development of standardized hand-to-hand combat drills, that is.


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.