Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
Jaron Bernstein wrote:Richard Strey wrote:I daresay that there's a difference between being injured in the hands or loosing a finger, which is more permanent. If you look at the Belgian longsword rules Matt Galas posted on the SFI, you'll see that they valued their hands a great deal. And that is with a competetive system that counts steel-on-meat hits.
Hmmm....Meyer in a number of places says specifically to target the hands or arms from the elbows down. I can give some quotes if needed. And this in what is supposed to be a "sport" system according to some Meyerteers.
Richard Strey wrote:Correct. And that is, according to Matt Galas (see the same thread) one of the differences when it comes to the "German System" of recreational fighting. *g*
But the question was how much people back then cared about hand injuries and the sources seem to show that at least a number of Belgian guilds did do so sufficiently to adjust their rules.
Jaron Bernstein wrote:Richard Strey wrote:Correct. And that is, according to Matt Galas (see the same thread) one of the differences when it comes to the "German System" of recreational fighting. *g*
But the question was how much people back then cared about hand injuries and the sources seem to show that at least a number of Belgian guilds did do so sufficiently to adjust their rules.
That does seem to be the case. I wonder what kind of medical treatments they had? I imagine that sutures were around. What about setting broken bones?
david welch wrote:In the blowups of Albrecht Dürer's "The Triumphal Procession of Maximilian", almost everyone to the man shows hand injuries, some serious... mangled hands, fingers pointing in "wrong" directions, missing fingers, etc.
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||