Terminology: Free-play vs. Sparring

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

Guest

Terminology: Free-play vs. Sparring

Postby Guest » Tue May 27, 2003 3:46 pm

In my recent purusal of various sites and forums, I've seen the words Free-play and Sparring being used in many different ways, and was wondering what you all think of when you use these two words, and any possible information about their historical use (if any) and origin.

For me, Free-play is what we usually do with wooden or steel weapons, not using such force that we cannot strike our oponent without seriously hurting them. It is slower than full speed and force.

On a few occations someone has come trained with us who was new, and had fairly extreem fear of hurting / hitting me as I was teaching them. If they came out again, remembering from the last session they had problems, I would get out padded swords and ask them to "free-play" - that is, moving very slowly as if using wooden weapons, but using padded ones they could get used to the idea of hitting someone, and would be more ready do drills and counters with wasters.

Sparring, to me, is what is done with only padded weapons, using strong, fast, hard blows (but still controlled.) "Sparring" with a waster or steel would probably get someone hurt.

Now, I have brought my free-play speed up to fairly fast with advanced partners, and observers who haven't seen us spar or doesn't have experience in martial arts may have thought our blows would have / were stricking with full force. Even though we brought the speed up, however, we were still slowing, pulling our blows and had enough control to tell when a strike was likely and react accordingly, sometimes (such as with pommel stikes) not making contact but calling it out. The difference when using the padded weapons is we are slightly faster, and allowing our strikes to hit harder than otherwise safely done.

I hope that made sense, and please point out if there is anything I said I am doing that could be done better.

Guest

Re: Terminology: Free-play vs. Sparring

Postby Guest » Tue May 27, 2003 4:59 pm

I used the terms as sinonimous dealing with the kind of weapon used separately, but what you say makes sense.
So in free play-a hit sounds "pet" (tapping)
sparring- a hit sounds "paf" (controlled contact)
sparring without control- a hit sounds "SPAT"- something sounds "crack"- someone says "BWAAAAAA", I've seen someone sparring like this <img src="/forum/images/icons/mad.gif" alt="" /> I was temptated to put red paint on the blade of my padded sabre and tell him it was my last opponent's blood, maybe he believed me <img src="/forum/images/icons/smirk.gif" alt="" />

User avatar
Mike Cartier
Posts: 594
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 12:21 pm
Location: USA Florida

Re: Terminology: Free-play vs. Sparring

Postby Mike Cartier » Wed May 28, 2003 8:45 am

makes sense to me.
Freeplay and sparring exists in almost all the arts, you just have to look for it.
Both are essential to developing your skills.
freeplay helps you iron out your problems and get a flow going.
Sparring intriduces the elements of chaos, power and realtime into the mix.
Mike Cartier
Meyer Frei Fechter
www.freifechter.com


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.