Postby Vincent D. Pisano » Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:21 am
Thanks to everyone for their advice so far, but maybe I should clarify my intentions and experience. I’ve handled Albions before and have cut-tested quite a few times with Albion’s “Regent” sword, which is a great piece, and worth every dollar. I’m familiar with the feel and dimensions of historically accurate pieces. I own a Del Tin great sword, but the tang bent almost 90 degrees on its first day cut-testing while trying to cut a soda bottle (!), and though their blades are decent, I will not trust them with any handles longer than a single-hand sword. I believe this has also made me wary of spending a lot of money on a sword and having the same thing happen.
I would prefer to have an Albion, as historical accuracy is important to me. However, with money the way it is, it’s difficult to justify such a large purchase when I still need to install the hardwood floors in my new house. Meanwhile, the summer days are drifting by, I’m empty handed, and I probably won’t be able to afford one for a very long while. Also, sometimes you just want to cut the [expletive] out of something and have little worry as to the blade or hilt being damaged, as well as have a blade to drill with in the back yard, which shouldn’t require $900 to do. I’ve looked into Albion’s Squire Line, and it is still an option.
I know that the Darksword pieces are not historically accurate and are heavier than their accurate counterparts, however, they are tough. My question was whether their difference was so great that cut-testing and drilling would be useless – teach bad habits, you could say? Or rather, are the differences slight enough that they could be used as a viable substitute, albeit of a lesser quality, than, say, an Albion?
For a broader question, at what point does the difference become too great that to use one of these $300 swords one can no longer be considered to practice “historical” martial arts?