Some guys' ringen video on YouTube

European historical unarmed fighting techniques & methods

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
James_Knowles
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 7:15 pm
Location: Utah, USA

Some guys' ringen video on YouTube

Postby James_Knowles » Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:25 am

I feel like a perpetual noob on unarmed stuff.

Stumbled upon http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCS_tFVv-Ww with a couple of guys working from Codex Wallerstein. Any comments? To my untrained eye a bunch looks sloppy. At least they're taking a crack at it.
James Knowles
ARMA Provo, UT

User avatar
Brent Lambell
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:02 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Brent Lambell » Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:34 am

I have watched a lot of videos from these guys and at some points I am impressed by their ability to display a technique very clearly for the camera, but I wonder how their form would do at full speed. Their footwork with longswords is very different from what we train here in ARMA, but their handerbeit is very clear which is nice. So for instructional purposes, I would say the videos are helpful enough but they lack a resisting opponent and intent.

Jay Vail
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 2:35 am

Postby Jay Vail » Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:44 am

They're okay. All that stuff works just fine in a real scramble.

User avatar
Randall Pleasant
Posts: 872
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Flower Mound, Texas, USA

Re: Some guys' ringen video on YouTube

Postby Randall Pleasant » Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:39 pm

James_Knowles wrote:I feel like a perpetual noob on unarmed stuff.

Stumbled upon http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCS_tFVv-Ww with a couple of guys working from Codex Wallerstein. Any comments? To my untrained eye a bunch looks sloppy. At least they're taking a crack at it.


I met these guys at the 2006 WMAW event. I'm at the bottom of the ARMA food chain yet I was totally unimpressed with their skills at the time. From the videos they have posted on YouTube they do seem to have improved a great deal. The bigest problem is that they focus too much on looking like the pictures in Pauls Kal (using Lazy Vom Tag, etc.) at the expense of actual fighting skills. I actually like the unarmed video much better then their longsword videos.
Ran Pleasant

User avatar
Shane Smith
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:15 pm
Location: Virginia Beach

Postby Shane Smith » Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:28 pm

Brent Lambell wrote:I have watched a lot of videos from these guys and at some points I am impressed by their ability to display a technique very clearly for the camera, but I wonder how their form would do at full speed. Their footwork with longswords is very different from what we train here in ARMA, but their handerbeit is very clear which is nice. So for instructional purposes, I would say the videos are helpful enough but they lack a resisting opponent and intent.


I too think that they're just slowing it down and going robotically for the camera. I do the same when demonstrating sometimes because in the blur of motion, folks often miss the subtle actions. I've never seen their Swordplay as far as I know so I am unqualified to comment there...
Shane Smith~ARMA Forum Moderator
ARMA~VAB
Free Scholar

User avatar
Brent Lambell
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:02 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Brent Lambell » Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:28 pm

This is a link to their Youtube video page.

http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=MEMAG&p=r

User avatar
David_Knight
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:56 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Postby David_Knight » Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:21 am

Generally, I think they have interpreted the text correctly. However, I am positive that they are very, very wrong about one of the most basic--and therefore most important--elements of ringen: the position of your arms when you come to grips.

Notice that when one of them stands with his right leg leading, he grips his opponent's left tricep (or as the manuals tend to phrase it, "his left arm on the outside") with his right hand, and his opponent's right bicep (or "his right arm on the inside") with his left hand. Anyone with a grappling or wrestling background should find that position very awkward, as we are taught to do the exact opposite (if your left leg is leading, your left arm shoots for an underhook, which in the clinch is equivalent to gripping "on the inside" with your left).

I am certain that these guys grip that way because they are trying to make the text of the first plate ("The Leg Lift") match the illustration. The problem is that the Codex specifically states that "this technique can be done on both sides"; the illustration shows it from a right-leg-forward starting position, while the text describes it from a left-leg-forward starting position.

Working from Bart's translation, the first ringen plate (Plate 31, p. 72) says that you should come to grips with "your right arm . . . outside" and "your left arm . . . inside." Mair also tells us to grip this way.

The next line says that "if he puts his foot forward, thrust with the arm next to his foot and pull his foot up."

Two important things to note here:

1) Codex Wallerstein says nothing about the foot positions!!! Mair, on the other hand, explicitly states that the left leg should be leading (not the right, as shown in the video).

2) "Gegen" can be a dangerously ambiguous preposition and "next to" could refer to either hand, depending upon how you translate it, where your feet are and how your shoulders are angled.

Because the guys in this video got point #1 wrong, they also screw up point #2. They appear to have interpreted "next to" as "on the same side as". Since they lead with the right foot, this requires them to bend down as they reach with their left hand. They are correct insofar as it is much easier to shoot with your left hand since it is on the inside and your opponent's outside grip on your tricep isn't that strong, but bending down and having to fight against his arm is an awkward way to scoop the opponent's right leg. It would be much more efficient to turn to the inside and scoop with your right hand. But if you have the wrong foot forward, you have to first pummel around the opponent's left arm, which has a good inside grip on your right bicep and can easily push you away. It's inefficient and awkward.

I interpret "gegen" to refer to left-right positioning and thus mean "beside." If you are standing properly with your left foot forward, your left arm on the inside and your right arm on the outside, your left arm is "beside" (i.e. directly to the left of) his leading leg. All you have to do is let go of his right bicep and turn your shoulders downwards to the right to scoop his leg. You slip right out of his right hand's grip on your tricep, so you don't have to fight against his strength. And you have much better leverage when you lift up.

I'd invite you all to attempt the leg lift from both stances against a resisting opponent. The way the guys in the video do it is considerably more difficult to pull off when your training partner keeps a firm grip and pushes you away instead of just letting go of your shooting arm like they do.

If testing the technique against a resisting opponent doesn't convince you that a left-leg-forward stance is correct when your left hand is on the inside, then proceed to Plate 34. Plate 34 describes a secondary attack in the event that your opponent withdraws his lead leg before you are able to scoop it. Thus, the blond figure on the right has tried to lift the dark-haired figure's leg, but the dark-haired figure has anticipated it and stepped back.

Note that the text says "this can be done on both sides." Note also that the blonde figure's left hand is on the outside and his right leg is forward. Since the text clearly says "break out with one hand", and he is executing the throw with his right hand, we can safely deduce that he shot for his opponent's leg with his right hand. If he shot with his right hand, and his left hand is on the outside, then his right hand must have been on the inside when they came to grips. All of these things indicate that the plate is showing this technique from a right-leg-forward, right-arm-on-the-inside stance. In other words, when your right leg is forward, you should grip the outside of his arm with your left hand and shoot from the inside of his arm with your right hand.

Ergo, reciprocally, when your left leg is forward, you should grip the outside of his arm with your right hand and shoot from the inside with your left, which is exactly what Mair teaches.

If he withdraws his leg before you can scoop it, then there is no need to let go of his tricep with your other hand. Instead, you should grip him firmly to retain control. These guys don't do that. Because their foundation is wrong, they end up having to completely release their opponent. That's a waste of energy and tactically unsound. A good grappler doesn't give up control.

This might seem like a minor point, but proper hand and foot position is actually no less critical in ringen than it is in fechten.

Stewart Sackett
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:46 am
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Stewart Sackett » Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:08 pm

David,

That's an excellent point & a detail of the video, which I had failed to notice. Thank you for bringing this up.

The subtleties of hand & foot position are often overlooked an can make a tremendous difference in technique.
All fighting comes from wrestling.

User avatar
David_Knight
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:56 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Postby David_Knight » Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:39 pm

I actually just spent almost three hours drilling the Zwerch throws and counters in the Codex with 3 prospective new members of ARMA NYC (one of them has a fully padded training area in his garage, which is basically a dream come true) and my theory proved absolutely correct. These techniques are designed for a left-foot-leading, left-arm-on-inside, right-hand-on-outside (or vice versa) stance. They simply don't work against a resisting partner if the wrong foot is forward.

There are some things the Codex takes for granted as well. Of particular note is that the inside arm should be pushing and the outside arm should be pulling. These actions compliment each other and allow you to off-balance your opponent. Mair dedicates a full plate to this; there's actually a very simple throw that basically uses the leverage from your arms pushing upwards and pulling downwards to off-balance him so you can throw him supine. You see a very similar technique in aikido.

Now that I have time to resume a hardcore training schedule, I'll try to get some videos up for everyone. These things are definitely easier shown than explained.

User avatar
Brian Hunt
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 2:03 am
Location: Price, Utah
Contact:

Postby Brian Hunt » Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:36 am

Good observations David,

Everything you have described is essential to the practice of Ringen. Without correct leverage a lot of these techniques become very difficult to pull off, but if you do things correctly they become almost effortless for a lot of the throws.

all the best.

Brian Hunt.
Tuus matar hamsterius est, et tuus pater buca sabucorum fundor!

http://www.paulushectormair.com
http://www.emerytelcom.net/users/blhunt/sales.htm

User avatar
Tony_Klabunde
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:05 am

Postby Tony_Klabunde » Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:15 am

I have to say I liked the videos. Yes they are simplistic, but the form and technique comes across.

I like how it goes from picture to application.
"The great aim of education is not knowledge but action."
Herbert Spencer
English philosopher (1820 - 1903)

User avatar
Tom Keesler
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:10 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Postby Tom Keesler » Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:05 pm

[quote="David_Knight"]I actually just spent almost three hours drilling the Zwerch throws and counters in the Codex...quote]

Could you define the "Zwerch throws" for me please?
-T. M. Keesler
ARMA DFW

" The thirst for knowledge should be unquenchable."

User avatar
Jeff Hansen
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Pelham, AL

Postby Jeff Hansen » Mon Oct 27, 2008 7:46 am

Tom Keesler wrote:
David_Knight wrote:I actually just spent almost three hours drilling the Zwerch throws and counters in the Codex...quote]

Could you define the "Zwerch throws" for me please?


The actual term is twirch but it is linguistically related to zwerch. They are also known as the horizontal stances. It is a series of throws shown in the Codex Wallerstein plates 36, 40,66,68, and 70.
Jeff Hansen
ARMA FS
Birmingham, AL study group leader

"A coward believes he will ever live
if he keep him safe from strife:
but old age leaves him not long in peace
though spears may spare his life." - from The Havamal

User avatar
David_Knight
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:56 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Postby David_Knight » Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:12 am

Jeff Hansen wrote:The actual term is twirch but it is linguistically related to zwerch. They are also known as the horizontal stances. It is a series of throws shown in the Codex Wallerstein plates 36, 40,66,68, and 70.


We're both a letter off. It's written "zwirch" in the original Codex. "Zwerch" is the modern German translation.

Another observation: in Talhoffer and several other MSS, you see combatants come to grips with the left arm on the outside (the opposite of what I advocate) when the left leg is forward. The guys in the video execute each technique from that position, presumably because they've seen it in other manuals.

The problem is that it's an absolutely leverage-neutral "safe" position. I don't believe (for reasons previously stated) that you're supposed to execute the techniques from there. Instead, I believe it's a position that you'd "go around with him" in, as the Codex says; in other words, you'd push and pull him until your feet were in the correct position to leverage a throw. If you start off in the "safe" position, you don't have to move your arms to get into position for a throw, just your feet.

You see this same "push/pull the opponent into position" action a lot in judo and Greco-Roman wrestling.

Again, this video highlights the dangers of jumping headfirst into ringen without a basic understanding of universal grappling principles or the realization that even the most straightforward manuals were written for the nobility, who'd customarily been wrestling since childhood and for whom it was thus unnecessary to state the obvious.

User avatar
Jeff Hansen
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Pelham, AL

Postby Jeff Hansen » Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:07 pm

Actually the spelling varies according to which plate you look at. 36 says tbirch, 40and 68 say twirch, and 66 and 70 are transcribed as zwirch but if you look at the plates themselves I think that it's a typo, and should be twirch.
My personal theory on the twirch by the way is that it is a name for our standard forward oriented swordsman"s stance. The throws being numbered as such because they are all carried out from that stance, as opposed to ,for instance, the firemans carry (plate 72)which requires you to shift into der vaage and isn't listed as one of the numbered twirch. Unfortunately it is only a theory since I have absolutly no proof beyond my own hunch. :? We don't even know what the first and second twirch are, Although I have a theory on that too. :)
Jeff Hansen

ARMA FS

Birmingham, AL study group leader



"A coward believes he will ever live

if he keep him safe from strife:

but old age leaves him not long in peace

though spears may spare his life." - from The Havamal


Return to “Unarmed Skills Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.