Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
Benjamin Smith wrote: "If I hit your hand/fingers/leg before your blow lands it's not going to count because you would lose control of your weapon"
Michael Navas wrote:Benjamin Smith wrote: "If I hit your hand/fingers/leg before your blow lands it's not going to count because you would lose control of your weapon"
If you'll all excuse my derailment for a moment, is this true according to historical sources?
If someone is doing a zorn to your head, and you cut off their hand or leg while they are doing it, obviously the cut will be disrupted, but it's still a sharp bit of steel, edge aimed at your head, coming a high speeds against it. It may be less deadly, but still deadly enough, surely?
How could countercuts that didn't also obstruct the enemy weapon be effective? Did it demand voiding of some sort?
Ken Dietiker wrote:Here's how I see it: if you go for a cut to the hands while your opponent is performing a down ward cut at your head and you are still standing in the path of his blade, you deserve to be cut, disrupted or not. I don't think it matters if the blade will still cut you even if the path or force is disrupted. Either move out of the way, or don't cut at his hands, cut at his blade instead. Or am I missing something here?
Stacy Clifford wrote:Usually when I hit someone in the hands it's not because I was aiming at them, they just got in the way of the real target (unless they just left them out there where I couldn't miss). Happens all the time. Chris has a point though, it does depend on which hand gets hit as to how badly your control of the sword is altered. I assumed we were talking about the forward hand.
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||